| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: TermQParserPlugin.
Results from 1 to 10 from
322 (0.847s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
[SOLR-4477] match-only query support (terms,wildcards,ranges) for docvalues fields. - Solr - [issue]
|
|
... in this case for term,wildcard,range,etc....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4477
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-02-21, 02:42
|
|
|
Re: svn commit: r1467946 - in /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/grouping/src: java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/ java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/function/ java/org/apache/lucene/search/grouping/term - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...its a good idea. there is absolutely no point requiring java7 in trunk if it cannot be used. we should clean this up everywhere across the entire codebase! On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 a...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-04-15, 12:11
|
|
|
[SOLR-4522] SimpleFacets.getListedTermCounts wont work for docvalues-only fields (or other custom fieldtypes) - Solr - [issue]
|
|
...Don't have a test yet: but this makes bare TermQuery (used for facet refinement).
SimpleFacets.rangeCount is correct (it invokes FieldType.getRangeQuery...), but I'm concerned about...
|
|
... the semantics here for terms.
Because FieldType.getFieldQuery is really more for an unstructured query, it shouldnt call this method.
Its probably better if FieldType has an explicit method to make...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... a structured term query (with getFieldQuery forwarding to that by default), but I dont want to make FieldType api confusing either...... |
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4522
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-01, 17:54
|
|
|
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-java7 - Build # 3943 - Still Failing - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...There is a constant for that purpose... It should be used here. I recently changed this test to use newsearcher which randomizes the sim. If it gets certain term freq normalizations...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-04-30, 01:51
|
|
|
LUCENE-1888: payloads on term vectors - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...See patch here: http://pastebin.com/aK0bbTMA I think its ready. File format changes are backwards compatible, etc. lucidimagination.com ...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2012-08-11, 13:01
|
|
|
Re: Opening up FieldCacheImpl - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I don't think codec would be where you'd plugin for a filterreader that exposes external data as fake fields. That's because its all about what encoding indexwriter uses to write. I think...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-26, 00:51
|
|
|
Re: svn commit: r1460165 - /lucene/dev/trunk/lucene/misc/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/sorter/SortingAtomicReader.java - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... like seekExact() on FilteredTermsEnum (it has a default impl in TermsEnum which calls seekCeil). is it really good that FilteredTerms/FilteredTermsEnum delegate these optional methods...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-23, 15:00
|
|
|
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b79) - Build # 4726 - Still Failing! - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...This is doing a lot of lookups by term (from previous readers) in its setNextReader to go back to ord, i'm not really sure its the most efficient way. Also it doesn't help the test gets...
|
|
... simpletext codec. But from my perspective, DocTermsOrds should not have such a slow seekExact(), but implement both lookupTerm() and termsEnum(). the latter is trivial and makes the test finish in 4...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... minutes. I'll look at the seekCeil logic and see if I can address lookupTerm too. Index: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocTerm... |
| ...Ords.java ================================================================== 1458071) +++ lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocTermOrds.java (working copy) @@ -880,5 +880,12 @@ public long getValueCount() { return numTerms(); } + + // TODO... |
| ...: implement lookupTerm based on logic in seekCeil() + + @Override + public TermsEnum termsEnum() { + return te; + } } } On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote: ... |
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-19, 01:50
|
|
|
[SOLR-4517] make FieldType.properties protected - Solr - [issue]
|
|
...Currently its not possible to make a fieldtype plugin via the normal lib/ mechanism that hides field type impl details (e.g. you just want a no-arg IDFieldType).
This is because you cant...
|
|
... do sheisty package-private stuff in a different classloader without extra sheisty reflection.
So I think pkg-private access is not very good for things intended to be plugins, you can only...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4517
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-01, 08:54
|
|
|
[SOLR-4641] Schema should throw exception on illegal field parameters - Solr - [issue]
|
|
...Currently FieldType does this correctly, but SchemaField does not.
so for example simple typos like (one from solr's test configs itself) omitOmitTerm...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4641
Author: Robert Muir,
2013-03-25, 06:08
|
|
|
|
