Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
clear query|facets|time Search criteria: .   Results from 11 to 20 from 180 (0.6s).
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Nope, lets start dev'ing  Lucene 4.2 work in master, 3.x in dedicated branches?   On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:  ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-21, 11:50
Re: Cutting a 3.0.3 Hotfix - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Yep. Note that you'll have to bump a version for good world order and for the nuget stuff to work.   On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christopher Currens  wrote:  ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-20, 22:25
Re: Commercial Licensing? - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...This is not a license then. The project in itself is about code work, not selling services. Feel free to drop me a line with what you are looking for exactly, I might be able to help.  ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-19, 20:03
Re: Commercial Licensing? - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...You don't need a commercial license, Lucene.NET is licensed under the ASL which allows you to sell your product bundled with it   On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Rob Vesse  wrote:...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-19, 18:35
Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...I suppose all that is left now is to agree on a plan for moving forward?   On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:  ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-18, 09:47
Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Prescott, any updates on this? I can see they opened a repo for us, but not sure whats the status on this?   On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:  ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-02-17, 11:11
Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Just a few more notes...  On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Troy Howard  wrote:    We don't have to work against github. Actually, perhaps we better work against an ASF's...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-01-24, 21:34
Re: Long-terms plans for supporting .NET 3.5 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Stefan, there's nothing to worry, really. Usually PRs have discussions on them, or its really clear what they are for. Worst case, a PR has been sent without a description or proper discussi...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-01-16, 07:34
Re: Lucene v3.6 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...Honestly I think we should completely drop .NET 3.5 support. If we had more time and more committers that may would have been a nice thing to have, but given the current amount of resources ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-01-02, 08:06
Re: Lucene v3.6 - Lucene.Net - [mail # dev]
...The general direction should be to put most of the efforts on a v4 port (4.1 probably...) and to start finding pieces in the codebase we can easily isolate and .NET-ify. Mostly readers, writ...
   Author: Itamar Syn-Hershko, 2013-01-01, 08:50
Sort:
project
Lucene.Net (180)
Lucene (90)
ElasticSearch (51)
OpenRelevance (19)
type
mail # dev (129)
mail # user (46)
issue (5)
date
last 7 days (0)
last 30 days (0)
last 90 days (11)
last 6 months (20)
last 9 months (180)
author
Digy (588)
Prescott Nasser (451)
Troy Howard (235)
Michael Garski (196)
Michael Herndon (195)
Christopher Currens (190)
Stefan Bodewig (183)
Itamar Syn-Hershko (180)
Simone Chiaretta (144)
George Aroush (108)
Granroth, Neal V. (88)
Robert Jordan (84)
Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C#...(75)
Simon Svensson (75)
digy digy (65)