| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: tika 0.8.
Results from 111 to 120 from
1073 (0.51s).
|
|
|
Did you mean:
|
|
Loading phrases to help you refine your search...
|
|
|
No results found for tika 0.8.
|
|
|
Search results for 0.8 :
|
|
|
Re: use of filter queries in Lucene/Solr Alpha40 and Beta4.0 - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...The "q" and "bq" params have changed slightly between your first query and the query where you add the "fq" param ... because of how "bq" is additively added to the main query, i...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-08-30, 17:39
|
|
|
RE: jira tracking of issues fixed in 4.0-ALPHA - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
..., the details of exactly what were done are listed at the bottom (i worked it out with Uwe on IRC). In short: it was a huge pain in the ass. The lesson to learn here is that if/when we release a 4.0...
|
|
...-BETA we should *IMMEDIATELY* ... 1) rename "4.0" to "4.0-BETA" in jira and mark it released 2) add a new "4.0" ...if we had done that for 4.0-ALPHA it would have prevented lots...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... of headaches and saved ~2 hours of time ---- How Hoss Spent His Day ----- In Jira project admin for both SOLR and LUCENE... 1) merge version "4.0-ALPHA" -> "4.0" - do this instead of delete... |
| ... to preserve "affects=4.0-ALPHA" 2) rename version "4.0" to "4.0-ALPHA" - keeps the versionId for (old) 4.0 and gives it to 4.0-ALPHA 3) add a new version "4.0" 4) bulk update "resolution... |
| ...=unresolved && fixVersion=4.0-ALPHA" -> set fixVersion=4.0 - do this before marking 4.0-ALPHA as "released" - if jira does it automaticly there is no way to stop emails - use "hoss20120711-bulk-40... |
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-11, 23:24
|
|
|
Re: jira tracking of issues fixed in 4.0-ALPHA - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... that have been resolved for a while and may already have multiple fix versions that we don't want to blow away in a bulk edit. Bottom line: adding "4.0-ALPHA" as a completley new version...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-11, 23:51
|
|
|
Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... it has bee nvery clearly defined since it was created: "the latest javadocs" ... just because we no longer explicitly link to it, doesn't mean we should stop trying to live...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-05, 19:07
|
|
|
RE: jira tracking of issues fixed in 4.0-ALPHA - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I've seen no comments on this: if anyone objects please speak up or i'll move forward with this soon. -Hoss ...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-05, 18:51
|
|
|
Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
.... If you want to proactively go through all the wiki docs and switch all "/api/..." links to "/api-4_0_0-ALPHA/..." you're certianly free to do that. (Are you going to volunteer to manualy keep...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-04, 17:52
|
|
|
Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... to the *current* javadocs for that class, and is heavily linked to from the wiki, blogs, bookmarks, and search engines. The fact that we now provide copies of multiple versions of the javadocs...
|
|
... Well then you and i have radically differnet opinions about SEO and good long term URL practices. it's one thing to say that a URL like "/java/2_9_0/.../Foo.html" should be allowed...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... to start 404ing once the 2.9.0 release is considered "too old" and the docs are taken off the site. but "/solr/api/.../Foo.html" is very differnet -- since Solr 1.1 it has always pointed... |
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-04, 17:28
|
|
|
Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... redirects, or update wiki links, or anything else, knock yourself out. i'm perfectly happy with the /solr/api-3_6_0/ and /solr/api-4_.../ links moving forward, i just don't wnat ot break existing...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-04, 18:03
|
|
|
RE: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... That assumes that anyone who linked or bookmarked "/api" specificly expected the 3.x links. /solr/api/... has existed since solr 1.1 and has always been updated to be  ...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-04, 18:12
|
|
|
Re: Solr 3.6.0 javadocs are missing from the site - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... Until i added the redirect in .htaccess (so they would start pointing to hte 4.0-alpha docs), java URLs like this one (from google, the wiki, bookmarks, blogs, etc...) were all broken...
|
|
...) could volunteer to add markdown pages, fix links, etc... if it really bothered you that the 3.6.0 javadocs were using the url "/solr/api" and you wanted them to be something else that's fine...
|
|
|
Author: Chris Hostetter,
2012-07-03, 21:57
|
|
|
|