| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 21 to 30 from
926 (0.138s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Can't find LimitTokenCountAnalyzer in 4.1 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...It's in 4.1, just not necessarily in the same place. $ jar -tf lucene-analyzers-common-4.1.0.jar | grep Limit org/apache/lucene/analysis/miscellaneous/LimitTokenCountAnalyzer.class org...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-14, 13:55
|
|
|
Re: How to add a field to hold a Java map object? - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...You should get back the stored value from the index as it was when you added it. But depending on your analyzer, and your requirements, you may not be able to search as you want. ...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-14, 09:49
|
|
|
Re: How to add a field to hold a Java map object? - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...StringField is in versions 4.x. You should have said you were using an old version. Ian. On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Cheng wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-14, 09:45
|
|
|
Re: How to add a field to hold a Java map object? - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...Assuming you mean the String representation of a Map, the same way you do any other String: use StringField or an analyzer that keeps the characters you want it to. Maybe WhitespaceAna...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-13, 09:54
|
|
|
Re: Optimal way to index - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
..."AA-" indexed as a StringField was matched by a TermQuery for "AA"? Sounds surprising. Ian. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Mohammad Tariq wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-12, 20:14
|
|
|
Re: Optimal way to index - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...- you are using a TermQuery which will only do exact matches. Since you're using StringField your text won't be tokenized but stored as is. I see you're searching on a mixed case...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-12, 16:20
|
|
|
Re: Strange behavior of term queries with StoredFields - 4.1 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...I think you can store field "x" using byte[] as one Field and index it using String as another Field. Or define your own FieldType and use the Field(String name, byte[] value, FieldTyp...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-12, 15:47
|
|
|
Re: Optimal way to index - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...You can certainly use lucene for this, and it will be blindingly fast even if you use a disk based index. Just index documents as you've laid it out, with the field you want to search ...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-11, 16:33
|
|
|
Re: Strange behavior of term queries with StoredFields - 4.1 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...Yes, that looks fine. As far as I'm aware the compression is low level and transparent to user code. Ian. On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy wr...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-11, 15:13
|
|
|
Re: Strange behavior of term queries with StoredFields - 4.1 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...StoredField does indeed only store the field, not index it. MatchAllDocs will find it because, by definition, it matches all docs. But other queries won't. Not sure what you mean...
|
|
|
Author: Ian Lea,
2013-02-11, 13:40
|
|
|
|
