| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: SchemaField.
Results from 21 to 30 from
1645 (2.162s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Sort fields all look Strings in field cache, no matter schema type - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
... a double[]. It also matters what the FieldCache entry is being used for... certain things like faceting on single valued fields still use the StringIndex. I believe the stats component does too...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2009-12-19, 19:37
|
|
|
Re: XML Schema for schema.xml - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On 3/3/06, Grant Ingersoll wrote: The schema should already parse and accept the following attributes on either a fieldtype or field definition: "termVectors", "termPositions", "term...
|
|
...Offsets" (these names are in FieldProperties). SchemaField represents the definitions in the schema. FieldType represents the definitions in the schema. DocumentBuilder is used to build Lucene...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... Documents, using SchemaField.createField() to create the Field, which delegates to FieldType.createField(). FieldType: public Field createField(SchemaField field, String externalVal, float boost... |
| ....omitNorms()); f.setBoost(boost); return f; } SchemaField already has public boolean storeTermVector() { return (properties & STORE_TERMVECTORS)!=0; } public boolean storeTermPositions() { return... |
| ...) { String val = toInternal(externalVal); if (val==null) return null; Field f = new Field(field.getName(), val, field.stored(), field.indexed(), isTokenized()); f.setOmitNorms(field... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2006-03-04, 15:15
|
|
|
Re: question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Bill Au wrote: Right. The limitations are known... but we don't have a good workaround at this point. Same problem as support...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2009-10-28, 03:43
|
|
|
Re: question about text field and WordDelimiterFilter in example schema.xml - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Bill Au wrote: That wouldn't work... of you tried to split and catenate at query time then foo-bar would generate the tokens "foo/foobar,bar" &nb...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2009-10-21, 00:09
|
|
|
Re: Dynamic schema design: feedback requested - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
... for the schema (whether it's on the local filesystem or on ZK). There are clear benefits to this being the persistence mechanism for the REST API. Even if the REST API persisted it's data in some...
|
|
... already have this intermediate representation - it's the in-memory IndexSchema object. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com ...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2013-03-11, 18:22
|
|
|
Re: Dynamic schema design: feedback requested - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
.... In local FS mode, it might be a very low cost (simply check the timestamp on the file for example). Code to re-read the schema and merge changes needs to be there anyway for cloud mode it seems...
|
|
.... *If* we needed to, we could just assert that the schema file is the persistence mechanism, as opposed to the system of record, hence if you hand edit it and then use the API to change it, your...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... on ZK that represents the system of record for the schema seemed to be the best. I never even considered making it non-human readable (and thus non-editable by hand). -Yonik http://lucidworks.com ... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2013-03-11, 20:03
|
|
|
Re: Dynamic schema design: feedback requested - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: I guess I like a more breadth-first method (or at least that's what it feels like to me). You keep both options in mind as...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2013-03-12, 01:27
|
|
|
Re: XML Schema for schema.xml - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On 2/26/06, Grant Ingersoll wrote: There is currently no schema. Everything useful should be in the example schema though. For fields: section indexed: true if this field...
|
|
... should be indexed (searchable) stored: true if this field should be retrievable multiValued: true if this field may contain multiple values per document omitNorms: (expert...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ...) set to true to omit the norms associated with this field (this disables length normalization and index-time boosting for the field) --> One little detail I left off... |
| ... is that you can set field attributes in fieldtype definitions, and they will act as defaults for fields of that type. // override the default "termVectors", "term... |
| ...Positions", "termOffsets" are also currently accepted attributes, but they don't do anything yet. For fieldtype definitions, if you create your own FieldType java class for some reason, unused attributes... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2006-02-26, 16:30
|
|
|
Re: schema.xml compatibility - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Teruhiko Kurosaka wrote: It shouldn't be a compatibility issue since both will be accepted. The xpath used to select fieldType nodes is "/schema...
|
|
.../types/fieldtype | /schema/types/fieldType" Hopefully soon... perhaps the end of the month. -Yonik ...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2008-07-10, 00:53
|
|
|
Re: clustering schema - Solr - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Actually just copying the example schema to contrib seemed to work fine... those should probably be kept in alignment regardless of if we decide to do something different about the data...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2009-10-20, 23:52
|
|
|
|
