| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 241 to 250 from
381 (0.728s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Re. Lots to talk about, ORP - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Dec 23, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Robert Muir wrote: +1. This is how open source works. The overall goal of the project is to be able to judge relevance for a search engine in ...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2009-12-24, 11:46
|
|
|
Re: Re. Lots to talk about, ORP - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hey Mark, just some quick replies below. On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Mark Bennett wrote: I should reword this, as Grant said... scratch your own itch. If you wan...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2009-12-24, 00:27
|
|
|
Re: Revising Precision and Recall (was Re: Calculating a search engine's MAP) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hi Ludovico, I work at Sensis (in Australia) and we build White and Yellow Pages directories with search functionality (using Fast ESP). We have built our own tool to measure rel...
|
|
|
Author: Mark Mansour,
2009-12-23, 23:43
|
|
|
Re: Re. Lots to talk about, ORP - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:49:39PM -0800, Mark Bennett wrote: Glad to hear it. :) Yes, there's agreement on that subject. It's just a matter of the fastest way to g...
|
|
|
Author: Marvin Humphrey,
2009-12-23, 23:21
|
|
|
Revising Precision and Recall (was Re: Calculating a search engine's MAP) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hello Ludovico, I'm coming into this conversation a bit late... but this is an interesting subject to me. People have talked about "precision and recall" for a very long time. Pe...
|
|
|
Author: Mark Bennett,
2009-12-23, 23:07
|
|
|
Re. Lots to talk about, ORP - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Thanks for the replies Robert and Grant, So I think there's general agreement on a few things: 1: Ideally TREC and ORP should be able to inter-operate, and everybody's welcome! &...
|
|
|
Author: Mark Bennett,
2009-12-23, 22:49
|
|
|
Re: Lots to talk about! (was Re: Any Java/ASF qrels code yet?) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Mark Bennett wrote: I think it would be nice to have both binary and something like: relevant, somewhat relevant, not relevant, embarrassing or a scale of...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2009-12-23, 20:55
|
|
|
Re: Lots to talk about! (was Re: Any Java/ASF qrels code yet?) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:37 PM, Mark Bennett wrote: First and foremost, this project is a way for Lucene to talk about relevance in a standard way. In other words, we are scratching...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2009-12-23, 20:43
|
|
|
Re: Lots to talk about! (was Re: Any Java/ASF qrels code yet?) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hello, I have inserted some quick comments below (not to all your questions, only what i know and can quickly answer). Glad to see your excitement about this project! On Wed, Dec 23, 2...
|
|
|
Author: Robert Muir,
2009-12-23, 20:22
|
|
|
Lots to talk about! (was Re: Any Java/ASF qrels code yet?) - OpenRelevance - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hello Simon and Robert, Robert, yes, I do have a private corpus and truth table. At this point I can't share it, though I'll ask my client at some point. I did find some co...
|
|
|
Author: Mark Bennett,
2009-12-23, 19:37
|
|
|
|
