| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: TieredMergePolicy.
Results from 31 to 40 from
174 (3.766s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Merging the Mailing Lists - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Will there also be a [EMAIL PROTECTED], merging java-user and solr-user? Shai On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2010-04-19, 06:30
|
|
|
Re: Merging the Mailing Lists - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I see. Thanks ! On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2010-04-19, 06:37
|
|
|
Move NoDeletionPolicy to core - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Hi I've noticed benchmark has a NoDeletionPolicy class and I was wondering if we can move it to core. I might want to use it for the parallel index stuff, but I think it'll also fit nicely...
|
|
... in core, together with the other No* classes. In addition, this class should be made a singleton. If moving to core is acceptable, do you think any bw policy needs to be enforced (such...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2010-04-08, 09:44
|
|
|
[LUCENE-4831] Association facets aggregators should not support rollupValues - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
... from AssociationFloatSum, but it got me thinking how come tests do not fail? After reviewing the tests I realized why don't fail – associations should not work with OrdinalPolicy...
|
|
..._PARENTS, then their parents will be aggregated.
On the other hand, someone might want to index the full hierarchy for counting too, using different aggregators for different requests. In that case, the OrdinalPolicy...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4831
Author: Shai Erera,
2013-03-14, 08:58
|
|
|
Re: Merging several taxonomy indexes for faceted search - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...I think that by mistake, the examples were not packaged with Lucene 3.4.0. I fixed it in the current 3x branch, so hopefully they will be available with 3.5.0, when it's out. Shai &nbs...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-10-24, 09:46
|
|
|
Re: Merging several taxonomy indexes for faceted search - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hi Christoph, You can certainly do that, and there are a bunch of APIs that will help you do that. We have a very high-level utility called TaxonomyMergeUtils, which offers a bunch...
|
|
... of merge() methods, each taking more parameters. Perhaps start with the simplest one (the one taking 4 directories) and see if that works for you. If you discover that you need more granular...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... control over the merge process, let me know and I can point you at more lower-level API. In fact, TaxonomyMergeUtils is part of the examples and you should get access to its source code, so you... |
| ... can see the steps you need to follow (at the lower level) in its more detailed merge() method. Shai On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Christoph Kaser wrote: ... |
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-10-19, 19:02
|
|
|
[LUCENE-2402] Add an explicit method to invoke IndexDeletionPolicy - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
...Today, if one uses an IDP which holds onto segments, such as SnapshotDeletionPolicy, or any other IDP in the tests, those segments are left in the index even if the IDP no longer references...
|
|
... can still wait for it if one wants, but otherwise it will give you the ability to immediately get rid of those segments.
TestSnapshotDeletionPolicy includes this code, which only strengthens...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... (IMO) the need for such method:
// Add one more document to force writer to commit a
// final segment, so deletion policy has a chance to
// delete again:
Document doc = new Document();
doc... |
| ... to exist there at all ...
Here comes the fun part - naming the baby:
invokeDeletionPolicy – describes exactly what is going to happen. However, if the user did not set IDP at all (relying... |
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2402
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-03-30, 16:50
|
|
|
[LUCENE-2385] Move NoDeletionPolicy from benchmark to core - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
...As the subject says, but I'll also make it a singleton + add some unit tests, as well as some documentation. I'll post a patch hopefully today....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-03-30, 16:49
|
|
|
shared doc stores and IW.addIndexes - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... policy, e.g. TieredMP, which assumes it can merge segments out-of-order? Will it work w/ shared doc-stores? How does the rest of the code work w/ segments that share doc stores? I assume...
|
|
... be improved in that area. Today, if you add an index (e.g. created with 2.9/3.0) and some segments share doc stores, they will still share the doc stores after copy. However, what if you use a merge...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-05-23, 12:39
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... also proposed to change the policy around changing default settings. But maybe we should take it one step at a time. Shai On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Michael Busch wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2009-06-16, 11:29
|
|
|
|
