| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 41 to 50 from
1451 (0.155s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: [lucy-dev] Proposal for implementation of immutable strings - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Apr 27, 2013, at 00:44 , Marvin Humphrey wrote: OK, I found it in the typemap. But the generated bindings define XSUBs directly, so the typemaps aren't used. It seems that we ...
|
|
|
Author: Nick Wellnhofer,
2013-04-26, 23:43
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-dev] Proposal for implementation of immutable strings - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Nick Wellnhofer wrote: Yes. The current type mapping code differentiates between `const CharBuf*` and `CharBuf*` (though I have discovered...
|
|
|
Author: Marvin Humphrey,
2013-04-26, 22:44
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-dev] Proposal for implementation of immutable strings - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On 26/04/2013 01:48, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Right. This even applies to zombie strings alone. Consider assigning a zombie string to a member var. This is currently done with &nbs...
|
|
|
Author: Nick Wellnhofer,
2013-04-26, 11:10
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-dev] Proposal for implementation of immutable strings - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Nick Wellnhofer wrote: The general approach looks great! The `origin` member var seems like an elegant solution to the shared-buffer proble...
|
|
|
Author: Marvin Humphrey,
2013-04-25, 23:48
|
|
|
[lucy-dev] Proposal for implementation of immutable strings - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Hello lucy-dev, I played around with some approaches to implement immutable strings to see how they work out. I didn't create any real prototypes but I always found that it helps a lot...
|
|
|
Author: Nick Wellnhofer,
2013-04-25, 16:00
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-user] Large index sizes - Lucy - [mail # user]
|
|
...Edwin, I have a setup with two indexes of 1.2 million files each (small files). I have joined them together in a union with the PolySearcher, it does hot have a noticeable speed differ...
|
|
|
Author: Thomas den Braber,
2013-04-25, 15:16
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-user] Large index sizes - Lucy - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hi Bob, Many thanks for the quick reply, it looks like we will have to beef up the machine a bit. Currently the largest index we have successfully built is 2G so still alon...
|
|
|
Author: Edwin Crockford,
2013-04-25, 14:47
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-user] Large index sizes - Lucy - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hi, I have indexed millions of files, ending up with a 127G index file, which works fine. There are enough resources for this. I also tried to do the same with 10s of milli...
|
|
|
Author: Bob Bruen,
2013-04-25, 13:16
|
|
|
[lucy-user] Large index sizes - Lucy - [mail # user]
|
|
...Have recently built started to use Lucy (with Perl) and everything went well until I tried to index a large file store (>300,000 files). The indexer process reached >8Bbyte...
|
|
|
Author: Edwin Crockford,
2013-04-25, 12:19
|
|
|
Re: [lucy-dev] CharBuf functions taking char* arguments - Lucy - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Apr 24, 2013, at 20:47 , Marvin Humphrey wrote: I don't think we need iterators for CharBufs at all. But we should have subclasses of CharBuf for every encoding. AFAICS, they...
|
|
|
Author: Nick Wellnhofer,
2013-04-24, 19:28
|
|
|
|
