| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: TieredMergePolicy.
Results from 41 to 50 from
174 (0.802s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: JIRA cleanup inactive issues? - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...'s 2-releases backwards index format policy :). Shai On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2013-02-14, 13:37
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... also proposed to change the policy around changing default settings. But maybe we should take it one step at a time. Shai On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Michael Busch wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2009-06-16, 11:29
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Also, much shorter text to read :) You're right, Michael's is 484 words, mine was 691. But in my defense, I did offer two more changes, that were later brought up on this thread (summi...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2009-06-16, 16:16
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Ahh ... I wish I had finished http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Lucene%27s-default-settings---back-compatibility-p23792927.htmlwith +1 of my own. Guess that's what was missing to get it to closure...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2009-06-16, 16:05
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Index back-compat is guaranteed to hold within minor releases. On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Shai Erera,
2009-06-16, 16:03
|
|
|
[LUCENE-3569] Consolidate IndexWriter's optimize, maybeMerge and expungeDeletes under one merge(MP) method - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
... segments?
Eventually, they really do what the MergePolicy decides that should be done. I.e., one could write an MP that always merges all segments, and therefore calling maybeMerge would not be so...
|
|
....
So the proposal is to replace all these methods with a single one merge(MergePolicy) (more on the names later). MergePolicy will have only one method findSegmentsForMerge and the caller...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... will be responsible to configure it in order to perform the needed merges. We will provide ready-to-use MPs:
LightMergePolicy – for setting on IWC and doing the ongoing merges IW executes. This one... |
| ... will pick segments respecting various parameters such as mergeFactor, segmentSizes etc.
HeavyMergePolicy – for doing the optimize()-style merges.
ExpungeDeletesMergePolicy –... |
| ...Maintenance (as expungeDeletes does not have to merge anything).
Instead of MergePolicy we call it MaintenancePolicy and similarly its single method findSegmentsForMaintenance, or get... |
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3569
Author: Shai Erera,
2011-11-15, 11:52
|
|
|
[LUCENE-4621] FacetIndexing/SearchParams house cleaning - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
...FacetIndexingParams lets you configure few things such as OrdinalPolicy, PathPolicy and partitionSize. However, in order to set them you must extend DefaultFacetIndexingParams and override...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4621
Author: Shai Erera,
2013-01-24, 06:33
|
|
|
[LUCENE-4164] Improve IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader) javadocs - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
..., and not e.g. like MergePolicy does at mergeFactor steps. Therefore I think it'd be good to clarify it to the user, and also encourage him to call this method several times if he has many Index...
|
|
...IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader) needs some improvements:
It falsely states that this method blocks any add/delete documents attempts.
It merges all input IndexReaders at once...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ...Readers to merge.
And while at it, mentioning that the IR can be opened with termIndexInterval=-1 since we don't need it during merge will be good – saves RAM.
I'll attach a patch shortly.... |
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4164
Author: Shai Erera,
2012-06-26, 08:31
|
|
|
[LUCENE-3138] IW.addIndexes should fail fast if an index is too old/new - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
... during commit() or segment merges. We should check that up front and fail fast.
This issue is relevant only to 4.0 at the moment, which will not support 2.x indexes anymore....
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3138
Author: Shai Erera,
2013-01-29, 05:55
|
|
|
[LUCENE-4610] Implement a NoParentsAccumulator - Lucene - [issue]
|
|
...Mike experimented with encoding just the exact categories ordinals on LUCENE-4602, and I added OrdinalPolicy.NO_PARENTS, with a comment saying that this requires a special Facets...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4610
Author: Shai Erera,
2013-01-21, 20:03
|
|
|
|
