| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: release computer.
Results from 61 to 70 from
643 (3.252s).
|
|
|
Did you mean:
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
|
No results found for release computer.
|
|
|
Search results for release :
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
..." that dependency, too? Does it make the release artifact invalid? is it a valid reason against adding that contrib, since its dependencies are not all mavenized? Typically, this is done by adding...
|
|
... the library in question to the release, renamed appropriately. For instance, in Solr, we had a trunk based version of Commons CSV at one point, so we put it up w/ the Solr artifacts and had...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-20, 18:31
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... a published spec) instead of creating the IntelliJ project files, which are not well understood and not publicly spec'd and subject to change w/ every release and simply have IntelliJ suck...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-20, 13:07
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Mark Miller wrote: how Maven works you don't realize why maintaining it downstream is not an option. Sorry. short Lucene/Solr, it. Like I...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-22, 13:00
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Robert Muir wrote: wrote: this same trick, why do we need to do any maven at all? we can just let those that want maven support, provide it themselve...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-20, 19:30
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: wrote: I completely disagree. It's either a first class citizen or it's not and by moving it out, you're guaranteeing...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-20, 14:18
|
|
|
Re: discussion about release frequency. - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Sep 20, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Mark Miller wrote: therefore I don't like it") reasoning for not liking it, whereby everyone complains that b/c Maven hides a bunch of details from y...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-09-20, 13:21
|
|
|
Re: Thinking about next release - Mahout - [mail # dev]
|
|
...So, how about we shoot for pencils down on September 1? That should give us enough time to incorporate GSOC, M-228, etc. Then, we can do a 5-7 day freeze and then release. Any thoughts...
|
|
... releases pre 1.0 would be good. -Grant On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Sebastian Schelter wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-08-09, 12:48
|
|
|
Re: Release process status report - Mahout - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Mar 12, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: No worries. If it's something you want to do, go for it. I suppose if we ever had people fighting over who was the RM,...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-03-12, 12:07
|
|
|
Re: Release process status report - Mahout - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:04 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: We've always just done it on a volunteer basis in all the projects I've been involved in. I don't see any reason to be forma...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2010-03-12, 02:54
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.6 - Mahout - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Do we have release notes and/or announcement? On Feb 5, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote: Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com ...
|
|
|
Author: Grant Ingersoll,
2012-02-06, 13:58
|
|
|
|
