| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 81 to 90 from
231 (0.461s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Lucene 3.0 and Java 5 (was Re: Finishing Lucene 2.9) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Aug 23, 2009, at 2:06 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote: My two cents. I think the contract of the 3.0 release is that it is a drop in replacement for the 2.9 release but requires J...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-23, 19:36
|
|
|
Re: Java 5 creeped again to Benchmark? - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On 08/13/2009 01:56 PM, Mark Miller wrote: I've been a stick-in-the-mud wrt migrating to Java 5 in the past. That said, I think that tests and benchmarks are QA tools and as such ...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-13, 20:57
|
|
|
Re: who clears attributes? - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Uwe, Is this example available? I think that an example like this would help the user community see the current value in the change. At least, I'd love to see the cod...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-11, 15:53
|
|
|
Beta (was Re: who clears attributes?) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On 08/11/2009 08:22 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: I think a beta would be a great idea. Not sure it needs to be "longish." Having not looked at it, I'm a bit leery about the toke...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-11, 15:39
|
|
|
Re: IndexWriter.getReader usage - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On 08/03/2009 08:21 AM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote: Our app is a desktop app, where we don't have control over the user's environment. Using a RAM dir is a good way to side-step the OS &nbs...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-03, 14:46
|
|
|
Re: IndexWriter.getReader usage - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Aug 1, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: I'm curious as to how it obviates the need for a RAM dir? In my use case I use them to create indexes and perform searc...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-08-01, 12:30
|
|
|
Re: test-tag does not really test against 2.4, it tests against a branch from trunk on 2008-11-29 - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...FYI, You can always create a branch from a specific revision. Don't know if this would help. On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: ...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-07-02, 20:54
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Michael McCandless wrote: The Debian process is manual, driven by policy. IIRC, they look at the CHANGES.txt to see if, according to their policy, it is a new major version...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-06-16, 19:04
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Mark Miller wrote: I don't think that there is a requirement that 5.x, or later, *must not* be able to read 3.x. It is merely an allowance. Conversely, the side effect of using m...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-06-16, 17:11
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for changing the backwards-compatibility policy - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Michael Busch wrote: Perhaps you should go back and see why the thread died. The points I made earlier, at the end of the thread, are still pertinent. I'll highlight some of that...
|
|
|
Author: DM Smith,
2009-06-16, 16:41
|
|
|
|
