| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: SchemaField.
Results from 91 to 100 from
1645 (0.571s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: Understanding fieldCache SUBREADER "insanity" - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...The other thing to realize is that it's only "insanity" if it's unexpected or not-by-design (so the term is rather mis-named). It's more for core developers - if you are just using Solr with...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-09-19, 19:36
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to alias a facet field? - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote: Per-field params don't currently look under the alias. I believe there's a JIRA open for this. -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com ...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-07-14, 14:23
|
|
|
Re: copyField: multivalued field to joined singlevalue field - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:35 AM, flyingeagle-de wrote: There is not currently, but it certainly makes sense. Anyone know of an open issue for this yet? If not, we sh...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-02-16, 17:23
|
|
|
Re: UnInvertedField limitations - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...It's actually limited to 24 bits to point to the term list in a byte[], but there are 256 different arrays, so the maximum capacity is 4B bytes of un-inverted terms, but each bucket is limit...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-09-06, 22:45
|
|
|
making schema.xml nicer to read/use - Solr - [mail # dev]
|
|
...What do people thing of leaving off "Factory" from tokenizers and token filters in schema.xml. Let the user say what filter they want, not necessarily how to get it. So you would say...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2006-08-22, 19:53
|
|
|
Re: Custom Field Type - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Fouad Mardini wrote: Can you put the two numbers in separate fields for this purpose? If you can't do it from the indexer, a schema with copyField...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2009-03-04, 18:12
|
|
|
Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #64: POMs out of sync - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
... be very deterministic (i.e. it should always fail if it were actually a non multiValued field). The *_i fields are multivalued according to schema.xml, so this exception should not happen (the...
|
|
...On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: Pretty strange. I can't reproduce locally. "multiple values encountered for non multiValued field val_i: [10, 20]" This should...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... version=1.0 in schema.xml means multiValued=true by default). Off of the top of my head, the only thing I can figure is that the maven based tests are somehow getting the wrong schema sometimes... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-08-28, 21:49
|
|
|
Re: Optimize facets when actually single valued? - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...-valued" also has implications for things other than faceting as well - as you say, people can be lazy about the schema definition and having things "just work" is a good thing. I've thought about...
|
|
... a more flexible field that acts like a single valued field when you use it like that, and a multi-valued field otherwise. There won't quite be back compat with responses though (since multi...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ...Valued fields with single values now look like "foo":["single_value"] instead of "foo":"single_value".) Perhaps we could add something like multiValued=flexible or something (and switch... |
| ... to that by default), while retaining back compat for multiValued=true/false. Either that or bump "version" of the schema or response. This is actually pretty important if we ever want to do more "schema... |
| ...-less" (i.e. type guessing based on input), since it allows us to only guess type and not have to deal with figuring out multiValued. It could lower the numer of dynamic field definitions necessary... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-11-11, 15:09
|
|
|
Re: Problem with faceting on a boolean field - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Kissue Kissue wrote: You can verify by changing the query from *:* to usedItem:false (or adding an additional fq to that effect). -Yo...
|
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-04-17, 18:53
|
|
|
Re: solr.StrField with stored="true" useless or bad? - Solr - [mail # user]
|
|
... orthogonal things (even for StrField). Why? Indexed means full-text inverted index: words (terms) point to documents. It's not easy/fast for a given document to find out what terms point to it...
|
|
.... Stored fields are all stored together and can be retrieved together given a document id. Hence search finds lists of document ids (via indexed fields), and can then return any of the stored...
|
[+ show more]
[- hide]
| ... fields for those document ids. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com ... |
|
|
Author: Yonik Seeley,
2012-09-11, 23:20
|
|
|
|
