| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: .
Results from 1 to 10 from
5339 (0.137s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.6.0) - Build # 459 - Still Failing! - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Hmm but on OS X I have Java 7 (the failure was Java 6). On Linux I ran with Java 6 but it didn't repro .. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, May ...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-17, 11:25
|
|
|
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.6.0) - Build # 459 - Still Failing! - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Doesn't repro on Linux for me, nor on OS X. I do see these warnings from the test: [junit4:junit4] 2> SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder". [...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-17, 11:25
|
|
|
Re: CorruptIndexException when opening Index during first commit - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Geoff Cooney wrote: Actually, a large healthy index as non-existent (because of file descriptor exhaustion). Hmm, I think first-commit in ...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-17, 11:13
|
|
|
Re: documentation-lint warning - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Adrien Grand wrote: I just committed that. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com ...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-17, 10:49
|
|
|
Re: CorruptIndexException when opening Index during first commit - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...Unfortunately this is expected behavior. We tried to fix it in LUCENE-2812, but this fix was too dangerous and could sometimes erase a good index (if transient IOExcs are happening, e....
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-16, 17:47
|
|
|
Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-trunk - Build # 81 - Failure - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I'll fix ... looks like we need to carve out an exception for this javax.servlet JAR... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ap...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-16, 11:55
|
|
|
Re: Retrieving FieldInfo - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Nicola Buso wrote: Yes and no :) Lucene will happily index such drastically different fields, but then, on merge, it will "merge" those t...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-14, 17:35
|
|
|
Re: TermsEnum.docFreq() returns 0 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Ravikumar Govindarajan wrote: Phew, thanks for bringing closure! One really healthy way to test your new codec is to run all Lucene tests ...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-14, 10:01
|
|
|
Re: TermsEnum.docFreq() returns 0 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...That code looks correct. But can you tie it all together into a runnable test case? Ie add in the terms enum, calling docFreq and getting 0 when it should be 1. Also, if yo...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-13, 15:49
|
|
|
Re: TermsEnum.docFreq() returns 0 - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...It should not be 0, as long as TermsEnum.next() does not return null ... can you make a small test case? Thanks. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fr...
|
|
|
Author: Michael McCandless,
2013-05-10, 16:49
|
|
|
|
