| clear query|facets|time |
Search criteria: net.
Results from 1 to 10 from
69 (0.229s).
|
|
|
Loading phrases to help you
refine your search...
|
|
RE: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...I missed no commit mails the last days. Maybe they were declared as spam by your mail filter software? Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: ...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2009-08-29, 20:47
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Close down the Lucene.NET project, effective January 31, 2011 - Lucene - [mail # general]
|
|
...+1 "Grant Ingersoll" schrieb: Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2010-12-29, 17:19
|
|
|
[TIKA-888] NetCDF parser uses Java 6 JAR file and test/compilation fails with Java 1.5, although TIKA is Java 1.5 - Tika - [issue]
|
|
...Lucene/Solr developers ran this tool before releasing Lucene/Solr 3.6 (Solr 3.6 is still required to run on Java 1.5, see SOLR-3295): http://code.google.com/p/versioncheck/Major.Minor Versio...
|
|
|
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-888
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2012-04-29, 22:20
|
|
|
RE: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Hi Mike, - Likewise. I know this, but in our case (e.g. creating a IN-SQL list, collecting measurement parameters from the documents) the warming is not really needed, it...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2009-04-28, 12:10
|
|
|
RE: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Some status update: I rewrote my collectors now to use the new API. Even through the number of methods to overwrite in the new collector is 3 instead of 1, the code got shorter (becau...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2009-04-26, 13:54
|
|
|
RE: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...Here! I updated www.pangaea.de to Lucene-trunk today (because of incomplete hashcode in TrieRangeQuery)... Works perfect, but I do not use the realtime parts. And 10 days before the same, no...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2009-04-24, 20:19
|
|
|
RE: Lucene 2.9 status (to port to Lucene.Net) - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...These issues all depend so much on each other, i would suggest to simply try Lucene-2.9-dev trunk (e.g. from downloaded from Hudson). We have this running here without any problems. Th...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2009-04-16, 15:57
|
|
|
RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89) - Build # 5678 - Failure! - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
...This is the related commit causing this: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/ac3e189c9099 Uwe Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de e...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2013-05-16, 08:01
|
|
|
RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0-ea-b89) - Build # 5678 - Failure! - Lucene - [mail # dev]
|
|
..."deregisterDriver" is a new permission in Java 8 b89 (updated yesterday). We have to add it to our policy file. Compare: http://download.java.net/jdk8/docs...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2013-05-16, 07:59
|
|
|
RE: How to improve retrieval time when searching for a date range - Lucene - [mail # user]
|
|
...Hi, Precision step=1 is not necessarily the fastest (see javadocs of Lucene, should be similar in Lucene.NET). Try the default, 4, first. In general, those range queries will always...
|
|
... be slower than text-only queries, as there is much more work to do (more terms, more documents,...) This question is more related to Lucene.NET so I would ask the question on their mailing list...
|
|
|
Author: Uwe Schindler,
2013-04-09, 14:58
|
|
|
|
