Michael McCandless
2011-09-07, 19:52
Uwe Schindler
2011-09-07, 20:01
Uwe Schindler
2011-09-07, 23:09
Bill Bell
2011-09-08, 05:59
Shai Erera
2011-09-08, 07:48
Uwe Schindler
2011-09-08, 08:16
Uwe Schindler
2011-09-08, 08:17
Michael McCandless
2011-09-08, 14:38
Michael McCandless
2011-09-08, 14:40
Michael McCandless
2011-09-08, 14:41
Shai Erera
2011-09-08, 14:57
Adriano Crestani
2011-09-08, 15:30
Michael McCandless
2011-09-08, 15:32
Ryan McKinley
2011-09-08, 19:15
Bill Bell
2011-09-09, 05:31
Michael McCandless
2011-09-09, 16:06
Robert Muir
2011-09-11, 14:11
Sanne Grinovero
2011-09-11, 18:49
Andi Vajda
2011-09-11, 19:56
Uwe Schindler
2011-09-11, 21:46
Erik Hatcher
2011-09-11, 22:00
Michael McCandless
2011-09-11, 22:56
Michael McCandless
2011-09-11, 22:57
Shai Erera
2011-09-12, 04:20
Simon Willnauer
2011-09-12, 07:03
Martijn v Groningen
2011-09-12, 10:20
Shalin Shekhar Mangar
2011-09-12, 10:59
Michael McCandless
2011-09-12, 16:41
Martijn v Groningen
2011-09-12, 20:12
Yonik Seeley
2011-09-12, 21:11
Michael McCandless
2011-09-13, 10:33
Jan Høydahl
2011-09-14, 11:59
-
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Michael McCandless 2011-09-07, 19:52
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Uwe Schindler 2011-09-07, 20:01
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____________________________________________
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____________________________________________
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Uwe Schindler 2011-09-07, 23:09
I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too fast J (I am still on vacation…)
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Bill Bell 2011-09-08, 05:59
Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
>http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
>v1166318
>
>as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
>Mike
>
>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
>http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
>v1166318
>
>as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
>Mike
>
>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Shai Erera 2011-09-08, 07:48
I reviewed and overall looks good.
I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
in to 3x and 3.4 branch. However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
facets feature are almost invisible currently.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>
> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>
> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>
> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>
>
>
> On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Please vote to release the artifacts at:
> >
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
> >v1166318
> >
> >as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
in to 3x and 3.4 branch. However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
facets feature are almost invisible currently.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>
> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>
> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>
> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>
>
>
> On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Please vote to release the artifacts at:
> >
> >
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
> >v1166318
> >
> >as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Uwe Schindler 2011-09-08, 08:16
We also had some changes in the flexible QueryParser, so we should respin
(ok mostly documentation, but without a respin, the backwards breaks and new
features are not visible to the end user, which is bad). From my experience
this is just starting the build script again J and waiting a few minutes.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Shai Erera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
I reviewed and overall looks good.
I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
in to 3x and 3.4 branch. However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
facets feature are almost invisible currently.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
>http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-r
e>
>v1166318
>
>as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
>Mike
>
>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(ok mostly documentation, but without a respin, the backwards breaks and new
features are not visible to the end user, which is bad). From my experience
this is just starting the build script again J and waiting a few minutes.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Shai Erera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
I reviewed and overall looks good.
I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
in to 3x and 3.4 branch. However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
facets feature are almost invisible currently.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
On 9/7/11 1:52 PM, "Michael McCandless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
>http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-re
<http://people.apache.org/%7Emikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-r
e>
>v1166318
>
>as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
>Mike
>
>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Uwe Schindler 2011-09-08, 08:17
We should respin because of the missing changes, as there are backwards breaks in the flexible query parser that are otherwise undocumented and would annoy users.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too fast J (I am still on vacation…)
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 1:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too fast J (I am still on vacation…)
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think this is still missing. Adriano?
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Please vote to release the artifacts at:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
_____
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Michael McCandless 2011-09-08, 14:38
Thanks Uwe. I'll wait a bit for any more small fixes and then spin an RC1....
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too
> fast J (I am still on vacation…)
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
>
>
>
> We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think
> this is still missing. Adriano?
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added the missing changes.txt entries to the branch. This all went too
> fast J (I am still on vacation…)
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0
>
>
>
> We have to add a changes.txt for the numeric flexible queryparser, I think
> this is still missing. Adriano?
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts at:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC0-rev1166318
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Michael McCandless 2011-09-08, 14:40
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>
> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>
> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
close?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>
> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>
> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
close?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Michael McCandless 2011-09-08, 14:41
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I reviewed and overall looks good.
>
> I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
> in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
Thanks Shai!
> However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
> complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
> know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
> I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
> facets feature are almost invisible currently.
I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> I reviewed and overall looks good.
>
> I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and checked
> in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
Thanks Shai!
> However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
> complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
> know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
> I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
> facets feature are almost invisible currently.
I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Shai Erera 2011-09-08, 14:57
Thanks Mike
Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
> >
> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
> checked
> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>
> Thanks Shai!
>
> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>
> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>
> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>
> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
Shai
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
> >
> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
> checked
> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>
> Thanks Shai!
>
> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I don't
> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>
> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>
> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but the
> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>
> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Adriano Crestani 2011-09-08, 15:30
Hi,
I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
Sorry for taking so long to commit these changes, just realized now 3.4 was
that close :(
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Mike
>
> Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
> update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
> while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
>> >
>> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
>> checked
>> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>>
>> Thanks Shai!
>>
>> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
>> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I
>> don't
>> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>>
>> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
>> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>>
>> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but
>> the
>> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>>
>> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
Sorry for taking so long to commit these changes, just realized now 3.4 was
that close :(
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Mike
>
> Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
> update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
> while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
>> >
>> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
>> checked
>> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>>
>> Thanks Shai!
>>
>> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
>> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I
>> don't
>> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>>
>> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
>> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>>
>> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but
>> the
>> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>>
>> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Michael McCandless 2011-09-08, 15:32
No problem, thanks Adriano!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Adriano Crestani
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
> I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
> Sorry for taking so long to commit these changes, just realized now 3.4 was
> that close :(
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Mike
>>
>> Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
>> update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
>> while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
>>
>> Shai
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
>>> >
>>> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
>>> > checked
>>> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Thanks Shai!
>>>
>>> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
>>> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I
>>> > don't
>>> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>>>
>>> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
>>> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>>>
>>> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but
>>> > the
>>> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>>>
>>> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Adriano Crestani
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I just committed the latest changes from LUCENE-2979 to 3x and 3.4 branches.
> I hope these changes still get in the next RC.
> Sorry for taking so long to commit these changes, just realized now 3.4 was
> that close :(
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Mike
>>
>> Indeed it was the Java version. I am now able to run forrest fine. So I'll
>> update the .html files soon. BTW, I noticed that I'm still on Forrest 0.8
>> while the files were produced w/ 0.9, so I'll upgrade as well.
>>
>> Shai
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I reviewed and overall looks good.
>>> >
>>> > I added a facet section to src/site/**/lucene-contrib/index.xml and
>>> > checked
>>> > in to 3x and 3.4 branch.
>>>
>>> Thanks Shai!
>>>
>>> > However, I fail to run Forrest on my computer,
>>> > complains about validation stuff. I will try to resolve this, but I
>>> > don't
>>> > know what happened - it used to work in the past with no problems.
>>>
>>> Likely you are using Java 1.6 (which for some reason never works w/ me
>>> w/ Forrest). Use 1.5 instead.
>>>
>>> > I don't know if we should spin another RC because of this change, but
>>> > the
>>> > facets feature are almost invisible currently.
>>>
>>> I'll spin an RC 1 soon...
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Ryan McKinley 2011-09-08, 19:15
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>
> Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
>
>> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
>> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>>
>> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>>
>> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
>> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>
> I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
> hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
> close?
>
>From SOLR-2242, i think the blocker is that people are against adding
a magic field name to the facet list results. The solution is to
change the format, the only hard part about this is that it will take
work to support distributed search. I think this is the current
consensus on that issue
For sure not something for 3.4.0!
ryan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>
> Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
>
>> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
>> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>>
>> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>>
>> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
>> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>
> I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
> hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
> close?
>
>From SOLR-2242, i think the blocker is that people are against adding
a magic field name to the facet list results. The solution is to
change the format, the only hard part about this is that it will take
work to support distributed search. I think this is the current
consensus on that issue
For sure not something for 3.4.0!
ryan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0Bill Bell 2011-09-09, 05:31
Thanks Ryan. I think I understand.
Can you help me with this ?
Bill
On 9/8/11 1:15 PM, "Ryan McKinley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Michael McCandless
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>>
>> Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
>>
>>> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
>>> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>>>
>>> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>>>
>>> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
>>> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>>
>> I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
>> hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
>> close?
>>
>
>From SOLR-2242, i think the blocker is that people are against adding
>a magic field name to the facet list results. The solution is to
>change the format, the only hard part about this is that it will take
>work to support distributed search. I think this is the current
>consensus on that issue
>
>For sure not something for 3.4.0!
>
>ryan
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you help me with this ?
Bill
On 9/8/11 1:15 PM, "Ryan McKinley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Michael McCandless
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Bill Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Are we going to try to get SOLR-2242 in this release?
>>
>> Sorry, no: we only hold releases for blocker issues.
>>
>>> I created the feature and I am effectively lost between Ryan McKinley,
>>> Chris Male and Yonik's comments.
>>>
>>> I thought we had something that worked, and we could enhance it later.
>>>
>>> IF this is not ready - as it appears - then we need a committer to help
>>> get it out the door. Who can spend some time to direct traffic?
>>
>> I'm not familiar enough w/ Solr to give an informed opinion here...
>> hopefully other Solr committers can chime in on the issue. It sounds
>> close?
>>
>
>From SOLR-2242, i think the blocker is that people are against adding
>a magic field name to the facet list results. The solution is to
>change the format, the only hard part about this is that it will take
>work to support distributed search. I think this is the current
>consensus on that issue
>
>For sure not something for 3.4.0!
>
>ryan
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Michael McCandless 2011-09-09, 16:06
Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Robert Muir 2011-09-11, 14:11
+1, thanks for creating this release candidate.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
lucidimagination.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Sanne Grinovero 2011-09-11, 18:49
+1
all tests on all Lucene-using projects I contribute to pass without
any change needed (a sure sign I should add more...).
Once more, great work and thank so much to everyone involved.
Sanne
On 11 September 2011 16:11, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, thanks for creating this release candidate.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>
>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
all tests on all Lucene-using projects I contribute to pass without
any change needed (a sure sign I should add more...).
Once more, great work and thank so much to everyone involved.
Sanne
On 11 September 2011 16:11, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, thanks for creating this release candidate.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>
>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Andi Vajda 2011-09-11, 19:56
I prepared a PyLucene 3.4 release candidate from the Lucene 3.4 branch.
All tests pass.
+1 to release Lucene Solr 3.4.
Andi..
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:06, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
All tests pass.
+1 to release Lucene Solr 3.4.
Andi..
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:06, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Uwe Schindler 2011-09-11, 21:46
Hi,
+1
I checked the Lucene Core JAR file as drop-in replacement for PANGAEA, works
without any problem. Did reindex some documents, checkindexed, optimized,
checkindexed again. All fine, no 1.6.0_24 crashes all is working as it
should. Code compiles fine, too. We are running now on this version with
Solaris and MMAP (as usual).
I had no time to verify the package contents and md5/sha1 hashes or try
Solr, but I think somebody might already have done this. I can verify that
the javadoc links to 0racle work again.
Changes look fine, one small thing: We have Java 7 try-with-resources
support now (our first Java 7 feature!!!), but the note is at wrong position
(under BUG FIXES):
"LUCENE-3334: If Java7 is detected, IOUtils.closeSafely() will log
suppressed exceptions in the original exception, so stack trace will contain
them. (Uwe Schindler)"
[should be NEW FEATURES] - But that's minor, just if we respin again, but I
don't expect this.
Mike: Thanks for the great new release and sorry for the respin.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1
>
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-
> rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
+1
I checked the Lucene Core JAR file as drop-in replacement for PANGAEA, works
without any problem. Did reindex some documents, checkindexed, optimized,
checkindexed again. All fine, no 1.6.0_24 crashes all is working as it
should. Code compiles fine, too. We are running now on this version with
Solaris and MMAP (as usual).
I had no time to verify the package contents and md5/sha1 hashes or try
Solr, but I think somebody might already have done this. I can verify that
the javadoc links to 0racle work again.
Changes look fine, one small thing: We have Java 7 try-with-resources
support now (our first Java 7 feature!!!), but the note is at wrong position
(under BUG FIXES):
"LUCENE-3334: If Java7 is detected, IOUtils.closeSafely() will log
suppressed exceptions in the original exception, so stack trace will contain
them. (Uwe Schindler)"
[should be NEW FEATURES] - But that's minor, just if we respin again, but I
don't expect this.
Mike: Thanks for the great new release and sorry for the respin.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 6:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1
>
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-
> rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Erik Hatcher 2011-09-11, 22:00
+1
Used this build in my classes today at NFJS Boston (sorry Mike - no time to say hi). Solr worked just fine.
Erik
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:06, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Used this build in my classes today at NFJS Boston (sorry Mike - no time to say hi). Solr worked just fine.
Erik
On Sep 9, 2011, at 12:06, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Michael McCandless 2011-09-11, 22:56
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changes look fine, one small thing: We have Java 7 try-with-resources
> support now (our first Java 7 feature!!!), but the note is at wrong position
> (under BUG FIXES):
> "LUCENE-3334: If Java7 is detected, IOUtils.closeSafely() will log
> suppressed exceptions in the original exception, so stack trace will contain
> them. (Uwe Schindler)"
> [should be NEW FEATURES] - But that's minor, just if we respin again, but I
> don't expect this.
Woops, OK, if we respin (looks unlikely so far). Can you fix on 3.x for 3.5?
> Mike: Thanks for the great new release and sorry for the respin.
No problem, it's really easy now: I have it down to a single Python
script! I'll commit it to dev-tools...
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Changes look fine, one small thing: We have Java 7 try-with-resources
> support now (our first Java 7 feature!!!), but the note is at wrong position
> (under BUG FIXES):
> "LUCENE-3334: If Java7 is detected, IOUtils.closeSafely() will log
> suppressed exceptions in the original exception, so stack trace will contain
> them. (Uwe Schindler)"
> [should be NEW FEATURES] - But that's minor, just if we respin again, but I
> don't expect this.
Woops, OK, if we respin (looks unlikely so far). Can you fix on 3.x for 3.5?
> Mike: Thanks for the great new release and sorry for the respin.
No problem, it's really easy now: I have it down to a single Python
script! I'll commit it to dev-tools...
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Michael McCandless 2011-09-11, 22:57
+1 to release.
I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Shai Erera 2011-09-12, 04:20
+1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
Shai
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to release.
>
> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
> >
> >
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
> >
> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Shai
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to release.
>
> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
> >
> >
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
> >
> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Simon Willnauer 2011-09-12, 07:03
+1 Changes look fine, tests work I beasted them for a couple of hours.
thanks mike!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
>
> Shai
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to release.
>>
>> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>> >
>> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>> >
>> > Mike McCandless
>> >
>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
thanks mike!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
>
> Shai
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to release.
>>
>> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>> >
>> >
>> > https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>> >
>> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>> >
>> > Mike McCandless
>> >
>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Martijn v Groningen 2011-09-12, 10:20
+1 All tests passed on my machine.
The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
module. I assume this will be removed, right?
On 12 September 2011 09:03, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 Changes look fine, tests work I beasted them for a couple of hours.
>
> thanks mike!
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
>>
>> Shai
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to release.
>>>
>>> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>> >
>>> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>> >
>>> > Mike McCandless
>>> >
>>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
module. I assume this will be removed, right?
On 12 September 2011 09:03, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 Changes look fine, tests work I beasted them for a couple of hours.
>
> thanks mike!
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 to release. Checked docs and changes and they look ok.
>>
>> Shai
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to release.
>>>
>>> I ran the release smoke tester, it was happy!
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>> >
>>> > as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>> >
>>> > Mike McCandless
>>> >
>>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Shalin Shekhar Mangar 2011-09-12, 10:59
+1
All tests pass on Linux 32-bit, 64-bit and Mac.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
All tests pass on Linux 32-bit, 64-bit and Mac.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Michael McCandless 2011-09-12, 16:41
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Martijn v Groningen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
> The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
> module.
By release notes, you mean the draft 3.4 release announcement, ie this
wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote34
?
> I assume this will be removed, right?
This (lucene/contrib/join) is actually new in 3.4.0, so we should
highlight it now.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
> The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
> module.
By release notes, you mean the draft 3.4 release announcement, ie this
wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote34
?
> I assume this will be removed, right?
This (lucene/contrib/join) is actually new in 3.4.0, so we should
highlight it now.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Martijn v Groningen 2011-09-12, 20:12
I was confused about this. I thought the join contrib was released
with 3.3 release, but it wasn't. So we should highlight it now!
On 12 September 2011 18:41, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Martijn v Groningen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
>> The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
>> module.
>
> By release notes, you mean the draft 3.4 release announcement, ie this
> wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote34
>
> ?
>
>> I assume this will be removed, right?
>
> This (lucene/contrib/join) is actually new in 3.4.0, so we should
> highlight it now.
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
with 3.3 release, but it wasn't. So we should highlight it now!
On 12 September 2011 18:41, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Martijn v Groningen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +1 All tests passed on my machine.
>> The Lucene release notes do contain some old highlights like join
>> module.
>
> By release notes, you mean the draft 3.4 release announcement, ie this
> wiki page:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote34
>
> ?
>
>> I assume this will be removed, right?
>
> This (lucene/contrib/join) is actually new in 3.4.0, so we should
> highlight it now.
>
> Mike
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Martijn van Groningen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Yonik Seeley 2011-09-12, 21:11
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
+1
-Yonik
http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
---------------------------------------------------------------------
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>
> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>
> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
+1
-Yonik
http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Michael McCandless 2011-09-13, 10:33
This VOTE has passed!
I'll announce/publish.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>
>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> +1
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll announce/publish.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>
>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>
>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>
> +1
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.4.0, RC1Jan Høydahl 2011-09-14, 11:59
Good! I'm +1 although I did not do any testing other than using latest 3x branch locally.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 13. sep. 2011, at 12:33, Michael McCandless wrote:
> This VOTE has passed!
>
> I'll announce/publish.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>>
>>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
On 13. sep. 2011, at 12:33, Michael McCandless wrote:
> This VOTE has passed!
>
> I'll announce/publish.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Yonik Seeley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Please vote to release the RC1 artifacts at:
>>>
>>> https://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging_area/lucene-solr-3.4.0-RC1-rev1167142
>>>
>>> as Lucene 3.4.0 and Solr 3.4.0.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -Yonik
>> http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
