Hi

After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon. We've
always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the
stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in
JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue
you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the
tentative release date below).

A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given that
the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about 2013
at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).

What do you think?

Shai

> we should release more often than we do

Right!

> A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given that
> the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about 2013
> at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).

What does this mean?

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon. We've
> always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the
> stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in
> JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue
> you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the
> tentative release date below).
>
> A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given that
> the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about 2013
> at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Shai
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon. We've
> always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the
> stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in
> JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue
> you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the
> tentative release date below).
>
> A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given that
> the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about 2013
> at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).
>
> What do you think?
>

+1.

I would really really prefer that if possible, we issue a Solr 3.1
release at the same time.

We can test everything at once, this should just be a matter of
packaging things correctly for the users.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> What does this mean?
>

Jason, it was just my (obviously weird) humor. Let's aim at March 1.

Robert, you're right. I should have written a Lucene/Solr 3.1 release.

Shai

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon.
> We've
> > always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the
> > stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in
> > JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue
> > you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the
> > tentative release date below).
> >
> > A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given
> that
> > the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about
> 2013
> > at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> +1.
>
> I would really really prefer that if possible, we issue a Solr 3.1
> release at the same time.
>
> We can test everything at once, this should just be a matter of
> packaging things correctly for the users.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

+1

On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What does this mean?
>
> Jason, it was just my (obviously weird) humor. Let's aim at March 1.
>
> Robert, you're right. I should have written a Lucene/Solr 3.1 release.
>
> Shai
>
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > After some discussion on IRC, I'd like to propose we release 3.1 soon.
>> > We've
>> > always said we should release more often than we do, and 3x, being the
>> > stable branch, is the perfect candidate. We've created a 3.2 version in
>> > JIRA, and started to re-assign 3.1-marked issues. If you have any issue
>> > you'd like to get into 3.1, please re-assign it back (but, note the
>> > tentative release date below).
>> >
>> > A tentative release date for 3.1 would be March 1st (yyyy.3.1). Given
>> > that
>> > the next 3.1 (date) will be in 2012 only (and we cannot be sure about
>> > 2013
>> > at all ...), let's try to make it to this year's :).
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> I would really really prefer that if possible, we issue a Solr 3.1
>> release at the same time.
>>
>> We can test everything at once, this should just be a matter of
>> packaging things correctly for the users.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------