I'm looking at some of the tests failing. I think it would be worthwhile having them figured out prior to a pre-package. Figured out could just mean we know under what conditions they fail and we can document that for now, but not yet fixed. But I think right now they are failing and we aren't even sure why - they could be invalid tests as well at this point. If anyone does find any more to share regarding the tests, comment here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484 ~P
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:27:13 +0300
> Subject: Re: guestimation on -pre nuget package.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If it is known to be stable for actual use, we RavenDB dev team will update
> to it in a branch and provide feedback. A -Pre nuget package released for
> every RC can definitely help here.
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Michael Herndon <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you all think we're at a point to do a -pre nuget package that users can
> > tinker with and provide feedback? The -pre flag means that it is only
> > meant to be a pre release in order to get feedback. We might get more
> > feedback if we package the binaries.
> >
> > Those that pushed the last package, what do you think the amount of effort
> > / time that will take to get something like this done? (I'm asking so that
> > I can block off enough time in my schedule to do this. )
> >
> > I'm guessing shouldn't be as rigorous as a typical apache release as its
> > meant just to package a alpha/beta binaries, not an official RTW.
> >
> > - michael.
> >