|
Robert Muir
2012-04-06, 17:27
Uwe Schindler
2012-04-06, 21:55
Dawid Weiss
2012-04-07, 09:00
Simon Willnauer
2012-04-07, 10:12
Tommaso Teofili
2012-04-07, 10:31
Martijn v Groningen
2012-04-07, 17:38
Steven A Rowe
2012-04-08, 03:58
Christian Moen
2012-04-08, 15:35
Michael McCandless
2012-04-08, 18:20
Chris Hostetter
2012-04-09, 19:32
Grant Ingersoll
2012-04-10, 11:18
Erik Hatcher
2012-04-10, 11:24
Shalin Shekhar Mangar
2012-04-10, 13:43
Yonik Seeley
2012-04-10, 13:50
Robert Muir
2012-04-11, 18:30
Bill Bell
2012-04-12, 17:19
Mark Miller
2012-04-12, 19:28
|
-
VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Robert Muir 2012-04-06, 17:27
Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1
I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) -- lucidimagination.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
RE: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Uwe Schindler 2012-04-06, 21:55
+1 to release!
Did all my testing again (cannot use smoke - windows, and as all others already did this - I do my own tests with my eyes and personal feeling for the risky parts - I don’t trust tools): Nothing different, except the small issues fixed and the licenses are correct. Sorry for noise today! I also compared package contents and filesizes; all fine! ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 7:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two) > > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Dawid Weiss 2012-04-07, 09:00
+1.
Checked on a mac, works fine. D. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 to release! > > Did all my testing again (cannot use smoke - windows, and as all others already did this - I do my own tests with my eyes and personal feeling for the risky parts - I don’t trust tools): Nothing different, except the small issues fixed and the licenses are correct. Sorry for noise today! I also compared package contents and filesizes; all fine! > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 7:27 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two) >> >> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >> >> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional >> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Simon Willnauer 2012-04-07, 10:12
LGTM
+1 (binding) thanks for all the hard work! simon On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Dawid Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1. > > Checked on a mac, works fine. > > D. > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 to release! >> >> Did all my testing again (cannot use smoke - windows, and as all others already did this - I do my own tests with my eyes and personal feeling for the risky parts - I don’t trust tools): Nothing different, except the small issues fixed and the licenses are correct. Sorry for noise today! I also compared package contents and filesizes; all fine! >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 7:27 PM >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two) >>> >>> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >>> >>> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >>> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >>> >>> -- >>> lucidimagination.com >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional >>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Tommaso Teofili 2012-04-07, 10:31
+1 (tested on 2 different machines, Mac OSX 10.6/10.7)
Tommaso 2012/4/6 Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my > +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Martijn v Groningen 2012-04-07, 17:38
+1. I ran the smokeTestRelease script successfully and everything looks
fine to me. Martijn On 7 April 2012 12:31, Tommaso Teofili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 (tested on 2 different machines, Mac OSX 10.6/10.7) > Tommaso > > > 2012/4/6 Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >> >> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my >> +1. >> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen
-
RE: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Steven A Rowe 2012-04-08, 03:58
+1
smokeTestRelease.py, including newly added checks, passes for me on Windows 7 + Cygwin (see LUCENE-3963). -----Original Message----- From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two) Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) -- lucidimagination.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Christian Moen 2012-04-08, 15:35
Robert,
Thanks a lot. Solr's NOTICE.txt looks fine now (I've checked both the binary distributions and the source distribution). I've also done a quick Japanese test, which also looks good. +1 Christian Moen http://www.atilika.com On Apr 7, 2012, at 2:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Michael McCandless 2012-04-08, 18:20
+1
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Christian Moen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert, > > Thanks a lot. > > Solr's NOTICE.txt looks fine now (I've checked both the binary distributions and the source distribution). I've also done a quick Japanese test, which also looks good. > > +1 > > > Christian Moen > http://www.atilika.com > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 2:27 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > >> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >> >> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Chris Hostetter 2012-04-09, 19:32
+1 SHA1's of the Artifacts inspected... fac4f6d6b2fb742c830f468b8d8847f8da440b8f *lucene-3.6.0-src.tgz 88b3380cdb4d9bd0b0a082be23831143bba1acce *lucene-3.6.0.tgz 7d38276a13a5e6a5ae49b7c5514f22b5f185082b *lucene-3.6.0.zip d4b95804603d4dfb5aa70def78a6744a07e50964 *apache-solr-3.6.0-src.tgz 558cdf145ab3bf22fb5d168d3f657df796bda639 *apache-solr-3.6.0.tgz 979ee56749f933221ec218477169d2e1af769813 *apache-solr-3.6.0.zip -Hoss ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Grant Ingersoll 2012-04-10, 11:18
+1. New all source packages look good and the Ivy stuff worked. Sigs check out.
On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:27 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Erik Hatcher 2012-04-10, 11:24
+1 - all of my typical tinkerings worked fine.
On Apr 6, 2012, at 13:27 , Robert Muir wrote: > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Shalin Shekhar Mangar 2012-04-10, 13:43
+1
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my > +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Yonik Seeley 2012-04-10, 13:50
+1
-Yonik lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. Boston May 7-10 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 > > I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. > Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Robert Muir 2012-04-11, 18:30
Vote has passed. Thanks everyone.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > -Yonik > lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. > Boston May 7-10 > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >> >> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- lucidimagination.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Bill Bell 2012-04-12, 17:19
When is it going out?
Sent from my Mobile device 720-256-8076 On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vote has passed. Thanks everyone. > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Yonik Seeley > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> -Yonik >> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. >> Boston May 7-10 >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >>> >>> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >>> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >>> >>> -- >>> lucidimagination.com >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 (take two)Mark Miller 2012-04-12, 19:28
It's already on many mirrors. The announce will be soon.
On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Bill Bell wrote: > When is it going out? > > Sent from my Mobile device > 720-256-8076 > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Vote has passed. Thanks everyone. >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Yonik Seeley >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> -Yonik >>> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference. >>> Boston May 7-10 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr36rc1 >>>> >>>> I tested with smoketester, (including newly added checks), so here is my +1. >>>> Note: smoketester currently does not support windows (use a linux system) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> lucidimagination.com >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> lucidimagination.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- |