Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Lucene and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
PyLucene, mail # dev - jcc compile a simple java class with errors, "void" java method translation may be incorrect


Copy link to this message
-
Re: jcc compile a simple java class with errors, "void" java method translation may be incorrect
Andi Vajda 2011-08-20, 21:57

  Hi Jason,

On Sat, 20 Aug 2011, jason_ni wrote:

> I used jcc to compile a very simple java class and found this error:
> -------------------------------------
> ...
> build/_ImJava/__wrap__.cpp: In function ?PyObject*
> idm::fudan::edu::cn::org::t_ImJava_get__total(idm::fudan::edu::cn::org::t_ImJava*,
> void*)?:
> build/_ImJava/__wrap__.cpp:8412: error: variable or field ?value? declared
> void
> build/_ImJava/__wrap__.cpp:8413: error: ?value? was not declared in this
> scope
> build/_ImJava/__wrap__.cpp:8414: error: ?t_void? has not been declared
> build/_ImJava/__wrap__.cpp:8414: error: ?value? was not declared in this
> scope
> error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
> -------------------------------------
> The c++ code translated by jcc:
> -------------------------------------
> 8410                     static PyObject *t_ImJava_get__total(t_ImJava
> *self, void *data)
> 8411                     {
> 8412                         void value;
> 8413                         OBJ_CALL(value = self->object.getTotal());
> 8414                         return t_void::wrap_Object(value);
> 8415                     }
> -------------------------------------
> The Java code:
> -------------------------------------
> public void getTotal(){
> System.out.println("error here");
> }
> -------------------------------------
> I have tested that replace "void" with "int" and gave a return value in
> "getTotal" then this classs can be compiled without error.
> So, I guess it's a bug...  Am I right?

Indeed, there was a bug with not checking that the getters for which prop
methods are generated aren't returning void.

It's now fixed in rev 1159920.

Thank you for the bug report !

Andi..