https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4066

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:44 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/217/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [yonik] SOLR-2824: add fromSearcher open time to JoinQuery for caching
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1310 lines...]
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.46s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMerging
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.84s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsMerge
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 40.52s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.packed.TestPackedInts
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.12s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPersistentSnapshotDeletionPolicy
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.75s, 14 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNRTManager
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.42s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 12.14s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNoMergeScheduler
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTypePromotion
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 104.69s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestRAMDirectory
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.16s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene3x.TestImpersonation
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestNumericTokenStream
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.25s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterCommit
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.84s, 12 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocumentsWriterStallControl
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 4.94s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLazyProxSkipping
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.38s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNeverDelete
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 3.69s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockAnalyzer
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.72s, 9 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestOpenBitSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 21.36s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestToken
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.70s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarityBase
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.26s, 29 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.33s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCollectionUtil
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 7.67s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiThreadTermVectors
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.33s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanations
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.54s, 22 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.52s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitTf
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.16s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterOnDiskFull
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.43s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNumericUtils

lucidimagination.com

Erik,

This fails locally the same way for me as well. I see:
"java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: solr.clustering.ClusteringComponent"

Some jar issue?

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #222

See
<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/222/changes>

Changes:

[ehatcher] Update clustering /browse UI to reflect long past change with
Carrot dependencies that used to require a system property switch to enable

[simonw] LUCENE-4066: compare actual # terms in the queue instead of unique
terms

------------------------------------------
[...truncated 10190 lines...]
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.44s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.18s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TestSystemIdResolver
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestLatvianStemFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestPropInject
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.87s, 2 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestCoreContainer
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.45s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.ConvertedLegacyTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.99s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 7.32s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite:
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryElevationComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 3.20s, 7 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestHashPartitioner
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 5.59s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.function.TestFunctionQuery
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.77s, 14 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.67s, 4 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite:
org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedQueryElevationComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.22s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest
   [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s J1 | BasicFunctionalityTest.testDeepPaging
   [junit4]    > Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726)
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.56s, 23 tests, 1 skipped
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.62s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermsComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 13 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestSurroundQueryParser
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.55s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.CSVRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.50s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.PolyFieldTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.74s, 4 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.04s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.NoCacheHeaderTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.54s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite:
org.apache.solr.handler.DocumentAnalysisRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.52s, 4 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestFoldingMultitermQuery
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.92s, 18 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.CurrencyFieldTest
   [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s J0 | CurrencyFieldTest.testPerformance
   [junit4]    > Cause: Annotated @Ignore()
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.75s, 8 tests, 1 skipped
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.RequestHandlersTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.54s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestDocSet
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.56s, 2 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.49s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.TestCSVLoader
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.81s, 5 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.FileBasedSpellCheckerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.86s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.response.TestPHPSerializedResponseWriter
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.51s, 2 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.SolrPluginUtilsTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.52s, 7 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.IndexReaderFactoryTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.49s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.49s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.FieldAnalysisRequestHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.55s, 4 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestPropInjectDefaults
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.45s, 2 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.TermVectorComponentTest
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.53s, 4 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandlerTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.51s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.TestNumberUtils
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.22s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite:
org.apache.solr.analysis.TestJapaneseBaseFormFilterFactory
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.TestLFUCache
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.50s, 5 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SampleTest
   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.16s, 2 te

Dawid once tried removing the solr.clustering.enabled property, but it made
core tests depend on contrib/clustering:

http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/7c1b0766b319b324
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Jack Krupansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Erik,
>
> This fails locally the same way for me as well. I see: "java.lang.**ClassNotFoundException:
> solr.clustering.**ClusteringComponent"
>
> Some jar issue?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk #222
>
>
> See <http://jenkins.sd-**datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-**
> Solr-tests-only-trunk/222/**changes<http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/222/changes>
> >
>
> Changes:
>
> [ehatcher] Update clustering /browse UI to reflect long past change with
> Carrot dependencies that used to require a system property switch to enable
>
> [simonw] LUCENE-4066: compare actual # terms in the queue instead of
> unique terms
>
> ------------------------------**------------
> [...truncated 10190 lines...]
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.44s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.**TestMultiCoreConfBootstrap
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.18s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.util.**TestSystemIdResolver
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.**TestLatvianStemFilterFactory
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.**TestPropInject
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.87s, 2 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.**TestCoreContainer
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.45s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.**ConvertedLegacyTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.99s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.**TestFaceting
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 7.32s, 3 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.**component.**
> QueryElevationComponentTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 3.20s, 7 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.**TestHashPartitioner
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 5.59s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.**function.TestFunctionQuery
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.77s, 14 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.**suggest.SuggesterFSTTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.67s, 4 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.**component.**
> DistributedQueryElevationCompo**nentTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.22s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.**BasicFunctionalityTest
>  [junit4] IGNORED 0.00s J1 | BasicFunctionalityTest.**testDeepPaging
>  [junit4]    > Cause: Annotated @Ignore(See SOLR-1726)
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.56s, 23 tests, 1 skipped
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.**LukeRequestHandlerTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.62s, 3 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.**component.TermsComponentTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 13 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.**TestSurroundQueryParser
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.55s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.**CSVRequestHandlerTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.50s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.schema.**PolyFieldTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.74s, 4 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.**CoreAdminHandlerTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.04s, 1 test
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.**NoCacheHeaderTest
>  [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.54s, 3 tests
>  [junit4]
>  [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.**DocumentAnalysisRequestHandler*
> *Test
>  [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.52s, 4 tests

this seems to be an issue that only happens with interrupts. I can see
how this can stream can be opened twice though. This patch should more
or less fix:

diff --git a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
index 8134b8c..a5e3d1c 100644
--- a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
+++ b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
@@ -118,16 +118,14 @@ final class CompoundFileWriter implements Closeable{

   private synchronized IndexOutput getOutput() throws IOException {
     if (dataOut == null) {
-      IndexOutput dataOutput = null;
       boolean success = false;
       try {
-        dataOutput = directory.createOutput(dataFileName, IOContext.DEFAULT);
-        dataOutput.writeVInt(FORMAT_CURRENT);
-        dataOut = dataOutput;
+        dataOut = directory.createOutput(dataFileName, IOContext.DEFAULT);
+        dataOut.writeVInt(FORMAT_CURRENT);
         success = true;
       } finally {
         if (!success) {
-          IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(dataOutput);
+          IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(dataOut);
         }
       }
     }

any objections?

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:57 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/289/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1359 lines...]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 15.70s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPagedBytes
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.05s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestNumericTokenStream
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCloseableThreadLocal
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermsEnum
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 8.36s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestMultiMMap
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 6.20s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.18s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDirectoryReaderReopen
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.84s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPersistentSnapshotDeletionPolicy
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.57s, 14 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMerging
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.85s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.94s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.99s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockAnalyzer
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.95s, 9 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLongPostings
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 3.46s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSnapshotDeletionPolicy
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.32s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanations
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.27s, 31 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.28s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitTf
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.29s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentReader

I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4070 for this

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this seems to be an issue that only happens with interrupts. I can see
> how this can stream can be opened twice though. This patch should more
> or less fix:
>
> diff --git a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
> b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
> index 8134b8c..a5e3d1c 100644
> --- a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
> +++ b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/CompoundFileWriter.java
> @@ -118,16 +118,14 @@ final class CompoundFileWriter implements Closeable{
>
>   private synchronized IndexOutput getOutput() throws IOException {
>     if (dataOut == null) {
> -      IndexOutput dataOutput = null;
>       boolean success = false;
>       try {
> -        dataOutput = directory.createOutput(dataFileName, IOContext.DEFAULT);
> -        dataOutput.writeVInt(FORMAT_CURRENT);
> -        dataOut = dataOutput;
> +        dataOut = directory.createOutput(dataFileName, IOContext.DEFAULT);
> +        dataOut.writeVInt(FORMAT_CURRENT);
>         success = true;
>       } finally {
>         if (!success) {
> -          IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(dataOutput);
> +          IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(dataOut);
>         }
>       }
>     }
>
> any objections?
>
> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:57 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/289/>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [...truncated 1359 lines...]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermVectorsReader
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 15.70s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestPagedBytes
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.05s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestNumericTokenStream
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCloseableThreadLocal
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTermsEnum
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 8.36s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestMultiMMap
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 6.20s, 5 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.18s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDirectoryReaderReopen
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.84s, 5 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPersistentSnapshotDeletionPolicy
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 2.57s, 14 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMerging
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.85s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.94s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.99s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockAnalyzer
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.95s, 9 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLongPostings
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 3.46s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSnapshotDeletionPolicy
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.32s, 8 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanations
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.27s, 31 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.66s, 1 test

I killed that one because it was taking very long. See attached stack trace. In fact it got a MockDir with Ratelimiter. Maybe it was not really an issue, but this test seems heavy.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 3:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64 #348
>
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-
> 64/348/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1317 lines...]
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 8 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 7 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite:
> org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 5 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 4 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRecyclingByteBlockAllocator
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSortedVIntList
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 19 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.pulsing.TestPulsingReuse
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimilarity
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollback
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestAttributeSource
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 5 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestTwoPhaseCommitTool
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVirtualMethod
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIOUtils

I committed a fix.... we were calling RateLimiter way too often from
MockIndexOutputWrapper...

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I killed that one because it was taking very long. See attached stack trace. In fact it got a MockDir with Ratelimiter. Maybe it was not really an issue, but this test seems heavy.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 3:17 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64 #348
>>
>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-
>> 64/348/>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [...truncated 1317 lines...]
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.04s, 8 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermRangeQuery
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 7 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelReaderEmptyIndex
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite:
>> org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestSystemPropertiesInvariantRule
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 5 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPerSegmentDeletes
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.06s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 4 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestUniqueTermCount
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMatchAllDocsQuery
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermEnum
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRecyclingByteBlockAllocator
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSortedVIntList
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 19 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.pulsing.TestPulsingReuse
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCharsRef
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 3 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimilarity
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollback
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhrasePrefixQuery
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestAttributeSource
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 5 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestTwoPhaseCommitTool
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 4 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVirtualMethod
>>    [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]

This seed doesn't reproduce locally (on my mac), can anyone else
reproduce this one?

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64/350/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [mikemccand] don't excessively call RateLimiter in tests
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1314 lines...]
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocValuesIndexing
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.07s, 14 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 9.27s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLazyProxSkipping
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestLazyProxSkipping.testLazySkipping
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test cannot run with SimpleText codec
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.57s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSentinelIntSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.18s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixRandom
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.38s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSort
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.96s, 25 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNeverDelete
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 4.42s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 13.19s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestMinimize
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.57s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpans
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 25 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestToken
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.85s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.43s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelCompositeReader
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.21s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDisjunctionMaxQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.28s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.51s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.78s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheRewriteMethod
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.41s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.64s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCustomSearcherSort
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.19s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.74s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadNearQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.15s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressNRT

lucidimagination.com

hmm I think I need to fix this test. checking the threadstate is no good.

simon

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seed doesn't reproduce locally (on my mac), can anyone else
> reproduce this one?
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64/350/changes>
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> [mikemccand] don't excessively call RateLimiter in tests
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [...truncated 1314 lines...]
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocValuesIndexing
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.07s, 14 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 9.27s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLazyProxSkipping
>>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestLazyProxSkipping.testLazySkipping
>>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test cannot run with SimpleText codec
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests, 1 skipped
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.57s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSentinelIntSet
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.18s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixRandom
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.38s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSort
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.96s, 25 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNeverDelete
>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 4.42s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 13.19s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestMinimize
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.57s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpans
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 25 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestToken
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.85s, 10 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.43s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelCompositeReader
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.21s, 8 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDisjunctionMaxQuery
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.28s, 10 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.51s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.78s, 5 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheRewriteMethod
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.41s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.64s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCustomSearcherSort
>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.19s, 2 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.perfield.TestPerFieldPostingsFormat

I committed a fix for that

simon

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm I think I need to fix this test. checking the threadstate is no good.
>
> simon
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This seed doesn't reproduce locally (on my mac), can anyone else
>> reproduce this one?
>>
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:10 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java6-64/350/changes>
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>>
>>> [mikemccand] don't excessively call RateLimiter in tests
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>> [...truncated 1314 lines...]
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocValuesIndexing
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.07s, 14 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.14s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 9.27s, 2 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLazyProxSkipping
>>>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J0 | TestLazyProxSkipping.testLazySkipping
>>>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test cannot run with SimpleText codec
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 2 tests, 1 skipped
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixFilter
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFieldsReader
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.57s, 4 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNamedSPILoader
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 3 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.11s, 2 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSentinelIntSet
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.18s, 2 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPrefixRandom
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.38s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSort
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 1.96s, 25 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNeverDelete
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 4.42s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestByteSlices
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 13.19s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestMinimize
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 2.57s, 3 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpans
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 25 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestToken
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.85s, 10 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocsAndPositions
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.43s, 6 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelCompositeReader
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.21s, 8 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDisjunctionMaxQuery
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.28s, 10 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.68s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRollingUpdates
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.51s, 2 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 4.78s, 5 tests
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheRewriteMethod
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.41s, 1 test
>>>   [junit4]
>>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery
>>>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.64s, 6 tests
>>>   [junit4]

Moin,

I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:

parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)

Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 #73
>
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
> 64/73/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysout
>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.0-b21 mixed
> mode):
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000 nid=0x4680
> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>    [junit4] at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>    [junit4] - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>    [junit4] at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>    [junit4] at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(
> AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
>    [junit4] at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterru
> ptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)
>    [junit4] at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterrupti
> bly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1303)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl.waitIfStalled(Documents
> WriterStallControl.java:116)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterFlushControl.waitIfStalled(Document
> sWriterFlushControl.java:616)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.preUpdate(DocumentsWriter.java:3
> 01)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter
> .java:361)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1276)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1248)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.updateDocu
> ment(ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.java:107)
>    [junit4] at
> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase$1.run(Threa
> dedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.java:255)
>    [junit4]
>    [junit4] "Thread-457" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024ce800 nid=0x467f
> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d4bf000]
>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>    [junit4] at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>    [junit4] - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a

I will look into this one

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:45 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/68/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [markrmiller] SOLR-3472: ping request handler should force distrib=false default
>
> [markrmiller] add ping and analysis request handlers for good UI defaults
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1325 lines...]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNot
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.03s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTerm
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestWildcardRandom
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.12s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestNumericTokenStream
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNumericRangeQuery64
>   [junit4] Completed in 13.16s, 34 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestBasics
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.58s, 24 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFlushByRamOrCountsPolicy
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.05s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.27s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhraseQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.65s, 17 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.17s, 24 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.87s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocValuesIndexing
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.64s, 14 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.46s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s | TestIndexWriterDelete.testApplyDeletesOnFlush
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.08s, 19 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTypePromotion
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.61s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSort
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.96s, 25 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.83s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLongPostings
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.19s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTieredMergePolicy
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.86s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.65s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestDisjunctionMaxQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.19s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestComplexExplanations
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.65s, 22 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMixedCodecs
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.19s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestNumericUtils
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.70s, 12 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.86s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestThreadedForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.23s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestRandomStoredFields
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.41s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.02s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiValuedNumericRangeQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.72s, 1 test

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moin,
>
> I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:
>
>        parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>
> Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.

its not.... I just changed a test in there. The stall control has a
problem which still doesn't seem to be resolved! I will look into
this..

simon
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 #73
>>
>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>> 64/73/>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite:
>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
>>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
>>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
>> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysout
>>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
>>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
>>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.0-b21 mixed
>> mode):
>>    [junit4]
>>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000 nid=0x4680
>> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
>>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>    [junit4]   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>    [junit4]   - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(
>> AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterru
>> ptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterrupti
>> bly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1303)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl.waitIfStalled(Documents
>> WriterStallControl.java:116)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterFlushControl.waitIfStalled(Document
>> sWriterFlushControl.java:616)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.preUpdate(DocumentsWriter.java:3
>> 01)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter
>> .java:361)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1276)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1248)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.updateDocu
>> ment(ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.java:107)
>>    [junit4]   at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase$1.run(Threa

What is exactly "parking to wait for"? I know it's related to the new
locks but I never had a chance to see what they actually do -- is it
spin wait or something? How is it different from regular wait on an
object?

Dawid

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Moin,
>>
>> I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:
>>
>>        parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>
>> Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.
>
> its not.... I just changed a test in there. The stall control has a
> problem which still doesn't seem to be resolved! I will look into
> this..
>
> simon
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 #73
>>>
>>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>> 64/73/>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------
>>> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] Suite:
>>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
>>>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
>>>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
>>> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysout
>>>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
>>>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
>>>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.0-b21 mixed
>>> mode):
>>>    [junit4]
>>>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000 nid=0x4680
>>> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
>>>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>    [junit4]   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>    [junit4]   - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(
>>> AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterru
>>> ptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterrupti
>>> bly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1303)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl.waitIfStalled(Documents
>>> WriterStallControl.java:116)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterFlushControl.waitIfStalled(Document
>>> sWriterFlushControl.java:616)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.preUpdate(DocumentsWriter.java:3
>>> 01)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter
>>> .java:361)
>>>    [junit4]   at
>>> org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1276)

Hi,

> What is exactly "parking to wait for"? I know it's related to the new locks but I
> never had a chance to see what they actually do -- is it spin wait or something?
> How is it different from regular wait on an object?

Definitely not a spin wait, as it used 0% CPU on the build server.

> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Simon Willnauer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> Moin,
> >>
> >> I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I
> requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:
> >>
> >>        parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
> >> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
> >>
> >> Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.
> >
> > its not.... I just changed a test in there. The stall control has a
> > problem which still doesn't seem to be resolved! I will look into
> > this..
> >
> > simon
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64
> >>> #73
> >>>
> >>> See
> >>> <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java
> >>> 7-
> >>> 64/73/>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------
> >>> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
> >>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
> >>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] Suite:
> >>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
> >>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
> >>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
> >>>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
> >>>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled
> >>> (@Nightly)
> >>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
> >>> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
> >>> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysou
> >>> t
> >>>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
> >>>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
> >>>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
> >>> (23.0-b21 mixed
> >>> mode):
> >>>    [junit4]
> >>>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000
> >>> nid=0x4680 waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
> >>>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
> >>>    [junit4]   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> >>>    [junit4]   - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
> >>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckIn
> >>> terrupt(
> >>> AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireShare
> >>> dInterru
> >>> ptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedI
> >>> nterrupti
> >>> bly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1303)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl.waitIfStalled(Do
> >>> cuments
> >>> WriterStallControl.java:116)
> >>>    [junit4]   at
> >>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterFlushControl.waitIfStalled(Do

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Dawid Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is exactly "parking to wait for"? I know it's related to the new
> locks but I never had a chance to see what they actually do -- is it
> spin wait or something? How is it different from regular wait on an
> object?

pretty much like a waiting on an object just not waiting on a Java
Object. In short it has pretty much the same semantics but you need to
wake up "parked" threads with an Unsafe#unpark call.

anyway the problem here is totally unrelated to the way we block. I
can reproduce the deadlock easily with TestNRTThreads. The problem
here is that the stall control can stall the IW even if there is no
flush scheduled ie. there is no way to ever "unstall" the fix for this
is pretty straight forward, I will open an issue soon.

simon
>
> Dawid
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Simon Willnauer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Moin,
>>>
>>> I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:
>>>
>>>        parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>>
>>> Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.
>>
>> its not.... I just changed a test in there. The stall control has a
>> problem which still doesn't seem to be resolved! I will look into
>> this..
>>
>> simon
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 #73
>>>>
>>>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>>> 64/73/>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] Suite:
>>>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
>>>>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
>>>>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
>>>> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>>> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysout
>>>>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
>>>>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
>>>>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.0-b21 mixed
>>>> mode):
>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000 nid=0x4680
>>>> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
>>>>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>>    [junit4]   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>>    [junit4]   - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>>>    [junit4]   at
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>>    [junit4]   at
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(
>>>> AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:834)
>>>>    [junit4]   at
>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterru
>>>> ptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:994)

see LUCENE-4071

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Willnauer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Dawid Weiss
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What is exactly "parking to wait for"? I know it's related to the new
>> locks but I never had a chance to see what they actually do -- is it
>> spin wait or something? How is it different from regular wait on an
>> object?
>
> pretty much like a waiting on an object just not waiting on a Java
> Object. In short it has pretty much the same semantics but you need to
> wake up "parked" threads with an Unsafe#unpark call.
>
> anyway the problem here is totally unrelated to the way we block. I
> can reproduce the deadlock easily with TestNRTThreads. The problem
> here is that the stall control can stall the IW even if there is no
> flush scheduled ie. there is no way to ever "unstall" the fix for this
> is pretty straight forward, I will open an issue soon.
>
> simon
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Simon Willnauer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Moin,
>>>>
>>>> I had to kill this one this morning (after 2:45h with 0% CPU); before that I requested stack trace. Lot's of threads are waiting:
>>>>
>>>>        parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>>>
>>>> Looks like this is related to the changes in r1340794.
>>>
>>> its not.... I just changed a test in there. The stall control has a
>>> problem which still doesn't seem to be resolved! I will look into
>>> this..
>>>
>>> simon
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 7:40 AM
>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64 #73
>>>>>
>>>>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>>>> 64/73/>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>> [...truncated 1287 lines...]
>>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 2 tests
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockCharFilter
>>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] Suite:
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.TestSimpleAttributeImpl
>>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestVersionComparator
>>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.00s, 1 test
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.Test2BPostings
>>>>>    [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.00s J1 | Test2BPostings.test
>>>>>    [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>>>>>    [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test, 1 skipped
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] JVM J0: stdout was not empty, see:
>>>>> /mnt/ssd/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-
>>>>> 64/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/junit4-J0-025632796a885228f.sysout
>>>>>    [junit4] >>> JVM J0: stdout (verbatim) ----
>>>>>    [junit4] 2012-05-21 05:40:08
>>>>>    [junit4] Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (23.0-b21 mixed
>>>>> mode):
>>>>>    [junit4]
>>>>>    [junit4] "Thread-458" daemon prio=10 tid=0x00000000024cf000 nid=0x4680
>>>>> waiting on condition [0x00007fa23d7c2000]
>>>>>    [junit4]    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>>>>>    [junit4]   at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>>>>    [junit4]   - parking to wait for  <0x00000000de689808> (a
>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterStallControl$Sync)
>>>>>    [junit4]   at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>>>>    [junit4]   at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(

> pretty much like a waiting on an object just not waiting on a Java
> Object. In short it has pretty much the same semantics but you need to
> wake up "parked" threads with an Unsafe#unpark call.

    /**
     * Block current thread, returning when a balancing
     * <tt>unpark</tt> occurs, or a balancing <tt>unpark</tt> has
     * already occurred, or the thread is interrupted, or, if not
     * absolute and time is not zero, the given time nanoseconds have
     * elapsed, or if absolute, the given deadline in milliseconds
     * since Epoch has passed, or spuriously (i.e., returning for no
     * "reason"). Note: This operation is in the Unsafe class only
     * because <tt>unpark</tt> is, so it would be strange to place it
     * elsewhere.
     */
    public native void park(boolean isAbsolute, long time);

I love the 'or' sequence ending in "or for no reason" :)

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm, this is strange.
Looking into it...

-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:54 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/80/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [yonik] SOLR-3469: prevent false peersync recovery by recording buffering flags in tlog
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1330 lines...]
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressAdvance
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestCachingTokenFilter
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNumericRangeQuery64
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.84s, 34 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestAddIndexes
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.17s, 20 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermDocs
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.44s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.38s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.32s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhraseQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.02s, 17 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.78s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s | TestIndexWriterDelete.testApplyDeletesOnFlush
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.20s, 19 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.13s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.72s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitNorms
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.81s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressNRT
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.20s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpans
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.91s, 25 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCollectionUtil
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.24s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelCompositeReader
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.26s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.94s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSimpleExplanations
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.22s, 69 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentReader
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.76s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestDoubleBarrelLRUCache
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.03s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRamUsageEstimatorOnWildAnimals
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadNearQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.22s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestScorerPerf
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.58s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPostingsOffsets
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.20s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestLazyProxSkipping
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.96s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDoc
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.35s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestWeakIdentityMap
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.76s, 2 tests

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Yonik Seeley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm, this is strange.
> Looking into it...

Oops, spoke too soon.  At a glance I mistook the list of file changes
for the list of failed tests.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

This does seem to be something important though:

   [junit4] ERROR   4.82s |
TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.testAccquireReleaseRace
   [junit4]    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: control
claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked
   [junit4]    > at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([9CB402821BB69236:A6C812B023565B87]:0)
   [junit4]    > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
   [junit4]    > at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.testAccquireReleaseRace(TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.java:155)
   [junit4]    > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
   [junit4]    > at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
   [junit4]    > at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
   [junit4]    > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1969)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)

Followed by exceptions related to closing leaked threads from an
executor pool I think.

Dawid

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:54 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/80/changes>
>
> Changes:
>
> [yonik] SOLR-3469: prevent false peersync recovery by recording buffering flags in tlog
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 1330 lines...]
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressAdvance
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestCachingTokenFilter
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNumericRangeQuery64
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.84s, 34 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestAddIndexes
>   [junit4] Completed in 4.17s, 20 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermDocs
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.44s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.38s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.32s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhraseQuery
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.02s, 17 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.78s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s | TestIndexWriterDelete.testApplyDeletesOnFlush
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>   [junit4] Completed in 3.20s, 19 tests, 1 skipped
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.13s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.72s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitNorms
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.81s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressNRT
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.20s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpans
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.91s, 25 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestCollectionUtil
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.24s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelCompositeReader
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.26s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestUTF32ToUTF8
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.94s, 5 tests

I am not sure if that is serious. I am working on that test to make it
more reliable or at least reliable in a way that if it fails its
really an error otherwise I keep on hunting ghosts. This one is almost
never reproducible - which sucks big time! I will raise the lock/wait
timeout such that a fail is really a fail.

simon
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Dawid Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This does seem to be something important though:
>
>   [junit4] ERROR   4.82s |
> TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.testAccquireReleaseRace
>   [junit4]    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: control
> claims no stalled threads but waiter seems to be blocked
>   [junit4]    >        at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([9CB402821BB69236:A6C812B023565B87]:0)
>   [junit4]    >        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>   [junit4]    >        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>   [junit4]    >        at
> org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.testAccquireReleaseRace(TestDocumentsWriterStallControl.java:155)
>   [junit4]    >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>   [junit4]    >        at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>   [junit4]    >        at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>   [junit4]    >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>   [junit4]    >        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1969)
>   [junit4]    >        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>
> Followed by exceptions related to closing leaked threads from an
> executor pool I think.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:54 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java7-64/80/changes>
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> [yonik] SOLR-3469: prevent false peersync recovery by recording buffering flags in tlog
>>
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [...truncated 1330 lines...]
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTermScorer
>>   [junit4] Completed in 0.02s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestStressAdvance
>>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestCachingTokenFilter
>>   [junit4] Completed in 0.01s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestNumericRangeQuery64
>>   [junit4] Completed in 4.84s, 34 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestAddIndexes
>>   [junit4] Completed in 4.17s, 20 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentTermDocs
>>   [junit4] Completed in 0.44s, 5 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestNorms
>>   [junit4] Completed in 2.38s, 3 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager
>>   [junit4] Completed in 3.32s, 6 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestPhraseQuery
>>   [junit4] Completed in 2.02s, 17 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestTopDocsMerge
>>   [junit4] Completed in 3.78s, 1 test
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete
>>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.01s | TestIndexWriterDelete.testApplyDeletesOnFlush
>>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: 'nightly' test group is disabled (@Nightly)
>>   [junit4] Completed in 3.20s, 19 tests, 1 skipped
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestBufferedIndexInput
>>   [junit4] Completed in 1.13s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterForceMerge
>>   [junit4] Completed in 1.72s, 4 tests
>>   [junit4]
>>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestOmitNorms
>>   [junit4] Completed in 0.81s, 5 tests

As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file to copy that it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding them on the linux and freebsd runs.

On May 23, 2012, at 8:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> See <http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64/175/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 10792 lines...]
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.IndexBasedSpellCheckerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.18s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SOLR749Test
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.66s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.LukeRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.15s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.XmlUpdateRequestHandlerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.69s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.OverseerTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 33.82s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 44.89s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 75.36s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.ZkSolrClientTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 14.66s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.DistributedTermsComponentTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 14.79s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 10.52s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.TestJoin
>   [junit4] Completed in 12.98s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.TestFaceting
>   [junit4] Completed in 23.93s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponentTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 8.20s, 9 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacetsTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 8.30s, 29 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.update.PeerSyncTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 6.30s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterFSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.08s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.SolrInfoMBeanTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.37s, 1 test
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.similarities.TestLMDirichletSimilarityFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 0.26s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.analysis.TestWordDelimiterFilterFactory
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.05s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterTSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.25s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.search.SpatialFilterTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.58s, 3 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreCheckLockOnStartupTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.45s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.SuggesterWFSTTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 2.20s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.servlet.CacheHeaderTest
>   [junit4] Completed in 1.61s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]  
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.core.TestSolrDeletionPolicy1
>   [junit4] IGNOR/A 0.02s | TestSolrDeletionPolicy1.testCommitAge
>   [junit4]    > Assumption #1: This test is not working on Windows (or maybe machines with only 2 CPUs)
>   [junit4]   2> 1237 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.setUp ###Starting testCommitAge
>   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 oasu.DirectUpdateHandler2.deleteAll [collection1] REMOVING ALL DOCUMENTS FROM INDEX
>   [junit4]   2> 1243 T3010 C49 UPDATE [collection1] webapp=null path=null params={} {deleteByQuery=*:*} 0 1
>   [junit4]   2> 1247 T3010 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.tearDown ###Ending testCommitAge

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file to copy that it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding them on the linux and freebsd runs.

It's unable to move, followed by unable to copy because "The system
cannot find the path specified".
Windows has the extra issue of not being able to move a file that is
open for any reason, so I imagine one would never get to the copy
logic in UNIX environments?

Even some virus scanners have caused tests (and sometimes even svn) to
fail on windows, so hopefully it's nothing like that.
We should prob add extra logging when both the move and copy fail to
try and pin down exactly why.

-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 7:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows-Java6-64
#175
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, this appears to perhaps be a windows issue with
> replication - if the logged errors are involved, it's not finding a file
to copy that
> it's expecting to find. Search me as to why. Certainly seems to be finding
them
> on the linux and freebsd runs.
>
> It's unable to move, followed by unable to copy because "The system cannot
> find the path specified".
> Windows has the extra issue of not being able to move a file that is open
for
> any reason, so I imagine one would never get to the copy logic in UNIX
> environments?
>
> Even some virus scanners have caused tests (and sometimes even svn) to
fail on
> windows, so hopefully it's nothing like that.
> We should prob add extra logging when both the move and copy fail to try
and
> pin down exactly why.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a single failure.

Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we have needed that I think.
On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:

> No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.

Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was weighed down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude my checkout directories.

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

The Jenkins Workspace is installed c:\Jenkins, so outside home dir. In that
case it should not be affected by Indexing. I can check this later.

> FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a
> single failure.

It happens not all the time. Just as reminder: This VM has 2 virtual
CPUs/cores!

> Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we
have
> needed that I think.

Lucene itsself has it.

>
> On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> > No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.
>
> Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was
weighed
> down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude
my
> checkout directories.
>
> - Mark Miller
> lucidimagination.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Finally got the same fail on my Windows virt machine - seems harder for me to see, but at least a confirmation.

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------

On May 24, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The Jenkins Workspace is installed c:\Jenkins, so outside home dir. In that
> case it should not be affected by Indexing. I can check this later.

makes sense - my workspace was in mydocs half the time, or my user dir.

>
>> FWIW, I've been looping this test on my Windows 7 VM and I have not seen a
>> single failure.
>
> It happens not all the time. Just as reminder: This VM has 2 virtual
> CPUs/cores!

My virt machine also has 2 virtual cores. I ran the test over 100 times before I got a failure - so it won't be easy for me to test any fix attempts - we will probably have to just commit something and wait and see what happens on your jenkins runs.

>
>> Perhaps we should have some Windows retry logic? Not the first time we
> have
>> needed that I think.
>
> Lucene itsself has it.

I'm not sure this is the issue yet, but it might be worth a try.

>
>>
>> On May 24, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>> No virus scanners active, but Windows Search in this VM.
>>
>> Are there excludes for the lucene/solr dirs? Been I while since I was
> weighed
>> down with windows, but that always killed my indexing if I didn't exclude
> my
>> checkout directories.
>>
>> - Mark Miller
>> lucidimagination.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.

I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me know if you need any help (or if you have questions) wrt to the
new test infrastructure. I am busy with other things at the moment and
there are rough edges... I plan to jump into it again once we ship a
release (don't know when this going to happen at the moment).

Dawid

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.
>
> I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

This def happens more with Java 7 for me. Rather than seeing it like 1 out of 100 at best, it is now happening about 1 out of 20.

Going on vacation for a week, so not sure if I will figure this out anytime soon, but now at least I can try some things and get more rapid and trustable feedback.
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Mark Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just noticed this seems to happen fairly frequently in the java 7 windows build, but I don't seem to see it in the java 6 windows build.
>>
>> I'll try and use Java 7 on my win machine when I get chance - should make it easier to experiment with fixes if I can get the same results locally.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

- Mark Miller
lucidimagination.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------

I committed a fix: rev 1353004

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:18 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See <http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/job/Lucene-Core-4x-Beasting/6762/>
>
> ------------------------------------------
> [...truncated 894 lines...]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestFixedBitSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 1.15s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCacheRangeFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.12s, 9 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestDeterminizeLexicon
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.37s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestMultiTermConstantScore
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.06s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.TestDocValues
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.25s, 14 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAutomatonQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 6 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestMultiFields
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.20s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestPayloads
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.17s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestTransactionRollback
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.07s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestSizeBoundedForceMerge
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.05s, 11 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFuzzyQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced2
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.06s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestFilterAtomicReader
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.10s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestIdentityHashSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.05s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestSentinelIntSet
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.12s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.TestRollingBuffer
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.05s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanSearchEquivalence
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.08s, 8 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestRegexpQuery
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.03s, 7 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestCachingWrapperFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 5 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpanExplanationsOfNonMatches
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.04s, 31 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.spans.TestSpansAdvanced
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.document.TestDocument
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.03s, 10 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestFileSwitchDirectory
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.02s, 4 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.util.junitcompat.TestJUnitRuleOrder
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestDocCount
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.25s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestParallelTermEnum
>   [junit4] Completed on J1 in 0.01s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestElevationComparator
>   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 0.02s, 1 test
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldValueFilter
>   [junit4] Completed on J3 in 0.15s, 2 tests
>   [junit4]
>   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestBooleanScorer