Robin Anil
2010-04-12, 21:43
Jake Mannix
2010-04-12, 21:50
Grant Ingersoll
2010-04-12, 23:34
Benson Margulies
2010-04-12, 23:46
Robin Anil
2010-04-21, 09:28
Grant Ingersoll
2010-04-21, 10:04
Robin Anil
2010-04-21, 11:10
Benson Margulies
2010-04-21, 11:55
Grant Ingersoll
2010-04-21, 12:31
Benson Margulies
2010-04-21, 12:37
Drew Farris
2010-04-21, 21:01
Grant Ingersoll
2010-04-21, 21:43
Benson Margulies
2010-04-22, 00:04
-
Status of Mahout TLPRobin Anil 2010-04-12, 21:43
Hi everyone,
I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
Robin
I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
Robin
+
Robin Anil 2010-04-12, 21:43
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPJake Mannix 2010-04-12, 21:50
>From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
we move forward with that, I thought.
-jake
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>
> Robin
>
until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
we move forward with that, I thought.
-jake
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>
> Robin
>
+
Jake Mannix 2010-04-12, 21:50
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPGrant Ingersoll 2010-04-12, 23:34
Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go with two things:
1. Mahout as TLP
2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some successful GSOC projects.
-Grant
On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
> we move forward with that, I thought.
>
> -jake
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>>
>> Robin
>>
Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go with two things:
1. Mahout as TLP
2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some successful GSOC projects.
-Grant
On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
> we move forward with that, I thought.
>
> -jake
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>>
>> Robin
>>
+
Grant Ingersoll 2010-04-12, 23:34
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPBenson Margulies 2010-04-12, 23:46
Here's a practical matter:
svn layout.
starting at the root we get, I propose:
- sandboxes
- mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
- collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
at the same level.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
>
> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go with two things:
> 1. Mahout as TLP
> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
>
> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some successful GSOC projects.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
>> we move forward with that, I thought.
>>
>> -jake
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>>>
>>> Robin
>>>
>
>
>
svn layout.
starting at the root we get, I propose:
- sandboxes
- mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
- collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
at the same level.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
>
> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go with two things:
> 1. Mahout as TLP
> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
>
> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some successful GSOC projects.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>
>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
>> we move forward with that, I thought.
>>
>> -jake
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>>>
>>> Robin
>>>
>
>
>
+
Benson Margulies 2010-04-12, 23:46
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPRobin Anil 2010-04-21, 09:28
Today is the day :)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Here's a practical matter:
>
> svn layout.
>
> starting at the root we get, I propose:
>
> - sandboxes
> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
>
> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> at the same level.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know
> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good
> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >
> > Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go
> with two things:
> > 1. Mahout as TLP
> > 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >
> > If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some
> successful GSOC projects.
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >
> >> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> >> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
> >> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>
> >> -jake
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> >>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
> >>>
> >>> Robin
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Here's a practical matter:
>
> svn layout.
>
> starting at the root we get, I propose:
>
> - sandboxes
> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
>
> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> at the same level.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know
> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good
> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >
> > Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go
> with two things:
> > 1. Mahout as TLP
> > 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >
> > If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some
> successful GSOC projects.
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> > On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >
> >> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> >> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
> >> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>
> >> -jake
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> >>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
> >>>
> >>> Robin
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
+
Robin Anil 2010-04-21, 09:28
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPGrant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 10:04
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> Today is the day :)
Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just so people have reasonable expectations.
Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off Confluence. Thoughts?
-Grant
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Here's a practical matter:
>>
>> svn layout.
>>
>> starting at the root we get, I propose:
>>
>> - sandboxes
>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
>>
>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
>> at the same level.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all know
>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good
>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
>>>
>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go
>> with two things:
>>> 1. Mahout as TLP
>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
>>>
>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by some
>> successful GSOC projects.
>>>
>>> -Grant
>>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>>>
>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called) before
>>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
>>>>
>>>> -jake
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Robin
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
+
Grant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 10:04
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPRobin Anil 2010-04-21, 11:10
I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
something which will get patched automatically?
Robin
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
>
> > Today is the day :)
>
> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to
> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just
> so people have reasonable expectations.
>
> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> Confluence. Thoughts?
>
> -Grant
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a practical matter:
> >>
> >> svn layout.
> >>
> >> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> >>
> >> - sandboxes
> >> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> >> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> >>
> >> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> >> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> >> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> >> at the same level.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> know
> >> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good
> >> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >>>
> >>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go
> >> with two things:
> >>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> >>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >>>
> >>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> >> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> some
> >> successful GSOC projects.
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> >>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> before
> >>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>>>
> >>>> -jake
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> >>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Robin
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
>
something which will get patched automatically?
Robin
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
>
> > Today is the day :)
>
> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to
> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just
> so people have reasonable expectations.
>
> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> Confluence. Thoughts?
>
> -Grant
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a practical matter:
> >>
> >> svn layout.
> >>
> >> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> >>
> >> - sandboxes
> >> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> >> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> >>
> >> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> >> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> >> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> >> at the same level.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> know
> >> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a good
> >> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >>>
> >>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to go
> >> with two things:
> >>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> >>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >>>
> >>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> >> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> some
> >> successful GSOC projects.
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> >>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> before
> >>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>>>
> >>>> -jake
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP, any
> >>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for this?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Robin
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
>
+
Robin Anil 2010-04-21, 11:10
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPBenson Margulies 2010-04-21, 11:55
Confluence?
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
> something which will get patched automatically?
>
> Robin
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> >
> > > Today is the day :)
> >
> > Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting
> to
> > do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> just
> > so people have reasonable expectations.
> >
> > Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
> > and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> > Confluence. Thoughts?
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here's a practical matter:
> > >>
> > >> svn layout.
> > >>
> > >> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> > >>
> > >> - sandboxes
> > >> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> > >> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> > >>
> > >> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> > >> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> > >> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> > >> at the same level.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> > know
> > >> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a
> good
> > >> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
> go
> > >> with two things:
> > >>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> > >>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> > >>>
> > >>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> > >> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> > some
> > >> successful GSOC projects.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Grant
> > >>>
> > >>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> > >>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> > before
> > >>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -jake
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> > >>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
> any
> > >>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
> this?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Robin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Grant Ingersoll
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >
> > Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >
> >
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
> something which will get patched automatically?
>
> Robin
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> >
> > > Today is the day :)
> >
> > Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting
> to
> > do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> just
> > so people have reasonable expectations.
> >
> > Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
> > and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> > Confluence. Thoughts?
> >
> > -Grant
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Here's a practical matter:
> > >>
> > >> svn layout.
> > >>
> > >> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> > >>
> > >> - sandboxes
> > >> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> > >> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> > >>
> > >> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> > >> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> > >> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
> > >> at the same level.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> > know
> > >> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a
> good
> > >> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> > >>>
> > >>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
> go
> > >> with two things:
> > >>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> > >>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> > >>>
> > >>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> > >> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> > some
> > >> successful GSOC projects.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Grant
> > >>>
> > >>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
> > >>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> > before
> > >>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -jake
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> > >>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
> any
> > >>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
> this?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Robin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Grant Ingersoll
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >
> > Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >
> >
>
+
Benson Margulies 2010-04-21, 11:55
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPGrant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 12:31
On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Confluence?
Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and then backed by some pages on Confluence. Check out what http://ofbiz.apache.org.
-Grant
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache security,
>> something which will get patched automatically?
>>
>> Robin
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
>>>
>>>> Today is the day :)
>>>
>>> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting
>> to
>>> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
>> just
>>> so people have reasonable expectations.
>>>
>>> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like OFBiz
>>> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
>>> Confluence. Thoughts?
>>>
>>> -Grant
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here's a practical matter:
>>>>>
>>>>> svn layout.
>>>>>
>>>>> starting at the root we get, I propose:
>>>>>
>>>>> - sandboxes
>>>>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
>>>>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
>>>>>
>>>>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
>>>>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
>>>>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go in
>>>>> at the same level.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
>>> know
>>>>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a
>> good
>>>>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
>> go
>>>>> with two things:
>>>>>> 1. Mahout as TLP
>>>>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
>>>>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
>>> some
>>>>> successful GSOC projects.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Grant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to wait
>>>>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
>>> before
>>>>>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -jake
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
>>>>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
>> any
>>>>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
>> this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------
>>> Grant Ingersoll
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>>>
>>> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
>>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>>>
>>>
>>
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
+
Grant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 12:31
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPBenson Margulies 2010-04-21, 12:37
Yup, same scheme at CXF.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > Confluence?
>
> Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and
> then backed by some pages on Confluence. Check out what
> http://ofbiz.apache.org.
>
> -Grant
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache
> security,
> >> something which will get patched automatically?
> >>
> >> Robin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Today is the day :)
> >>>
> >>> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy
> lifting
> >> to
> >>> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> >> just
> >>> so people have reasonable expectations.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like
> OFBiz
> >>> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> >>> Confluence. Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here's a practical matter:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> svn layout.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - sandboxes
> >>>>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> >>>>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> >>>>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> >>>>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go
> in
> >>>>> at the same level.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> >>> know
> >>>>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a
> >> good
> >>>>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
> >> go
> >>>>> with two things:
> >>>>>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> >>>>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> >>>>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> >>> some
> >>>>> successful GSOC projects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Grant
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to
> wait
> >>>>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> >>> before
> >>>>>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -jake
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>>>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
> >> any
> >>>>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
> >> this?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Robin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> Grant Ingersoll
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >>>
> >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > Confluence?
>
> Yeah, that's pretty much it. I'm thinking we have a static front page and
> then backed by some pages on Confluence. Check out what
> http://ofbiz.apache.org.
>
> -Grant
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I can help out in the redesign. Is there a CMS approved by apache
> security,
> >> something which will get patched automatically?
> >>
> >> Robin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Today is the day :)
> >>>
> >>> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy
> lifting
> >> to
> >>> do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> >> just
> >>> so people have reasonable expectations.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone up for a website redesign? I'm kind of thinking we do like
> OFBiz
> >>> and have a nice landing page, and then everything else is driven off
> >>> Confluence. Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> -Grant
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Benson Margulies <
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here's a practical matter:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> svn layout.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> starting at the root we get, I propose:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - sandboxes
> >>>>> - mahout(/trunk,tag,branches)
> >>>>> - collections(/trunk/tag/branches)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> sandboxes gives us a home for experimental branches; mahout will
> >>>>> contain the core product modules, collections the codegen and
> >>>>> collections itself, and any other ideas that want loose coupling go
> in
> >>>>> at the same level.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Grant Ingersoll <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Yep. Meeting is on the 21st. I will be attending and letting y'all
> >>> know
> >>>>> what happens (I can't imagine it fails). From the sounds of it, a
> >> good
> >>>>> chunk of subprojects will be splitting from Lucene.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, we should potentially start thinking about a Press Release to
> >> go
> >>>>> with two things:
> >>>>>> 1. Mahout as TLP
> >>>>>> 2. Mahout 0.5 and/or 1.0 or whatever you want to call it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If we could hit these two things together in the next month or so, I
> >>>>> think we could make some good noise that will be further built on by
> >>> some
> >>>>> successful GSOC projects.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Grant
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> From what Grant said last time we talked about this, we need to
> wait
> >>>>>>> until the next Apache directors meeting (or whatever it's called)
> >>> before
> >>>>>>> we move forward with that, I thought.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -jake
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Robin Anil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
> >>>>>>>> I am just checking on the status/plan to move to
> >>>>>>>> mahout.apache.org and the corresponding changes needed as a TLP,
> >> any
> >>>>>>>> estimates of when that would happen or are we still on hold for
> >> this?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Robin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> Grant Ingersoll
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
> >>>
> >>> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> >>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
>
+
Benson Margulies 2010-04-21, 12:37
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPDrew Farris 2010-04-21, 21:01
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just so people have reasonable expectations.
What sort of things need to be addressed?
Website: Sounds like Robin has a handle on the redesign
SVN: Do we treat the move like a branch from /lucene/mahout to /mahout
initially, and then further commits to move things around as Benson
suggested?
Mailing lists: these are handled by infra or someone here.
Jira, Confluence -- these stay largely the same, right?
People: committer accounts need to have a mahout group added.
I'll be happy to lend a hand where I can.
Drew
>
> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just so people have reasonable expectations.
What sort of things need to be addressed?
Website: Sounds like Robin has a handle on the redesign
SVN: Do we treat the move like a branch from /lucene/mahout to /mahout
initially, and then further commits to move things around as Benson
suggested?
Mailing lists: these are handled by infra or someone here.
Jira, Confluence -- these stay largely the same, right?
People: committer accounts need to have a mahout group added.
I'll be happy to lend a hand where I can.
Drew
+
Drew Farris 2010-04-21, 21:01
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPGrant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 21:43
On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable, just so people have reasonable expectations.
>
> What sort of things need to be addressed?
>
> Website: Sounds like Robin has a handle on the redesign
>
> SVN: Do we treat the move like a branch from /lucene/mahout to /mahout
> initially, and then further commits to move things around as Benson
> suggested?
Yep. I can take care of the move when we are ready.
>
> Mailing lists: these are handled by infra or someone here.
Yes, we need to open JIRA issues for these against INFRA.
>
> Jira, Confluence -- these stay largely the same, right?
Jepp.
>
> People: committer accounts need to have a mahout group added.
Jepp.
>
> I'll be happy to lend a hand where I can.
We also need http://mahout.apache.org created.
Other things:
1. Cleanup Lucene site etc.
2. Coordinate with Sally and the ASF marketing team to do a press release.
Probably some other things, too.
-Grant
+
Grant Ingersoll 2010-04-21, 21:43
-
Re: Status of Mahout TLPBenson Margulies 2010-04-22, 00:04
I thought it would be a bit less confusing if the current toplevel moved
directly to REPO/mahout/mahout instead of moving to REPO/mahout.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting
> to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> just so people have reasonable expectations.
> >
> > What sort of things need to be addressed?
> >
> > Website: Sounds like Robin has a handle on the redesign
> >
> > SVN: Do we treat the move like a branch from /lucene/mahout to /mahout
> > initially, and then further commits to move things around as Benson
> > suggested?
>
> Yep. I can take care of the move when we are ready.
>
> >
> > Mailing lists: these are handled by infra or someone here.
>
> Yes, we need to open JIRA issues for these against INFRA.
>
>
> >
> > Jira, Confluence -- these stay largely the same, right?
>
> Jepp.
>
> >
> > People: committer accounts need to have a mahout group added.
>
> Jepp.
>
> >
> > I'll be happy to lend a hand where I can.
>
> We also need http://mahout.apache.org created.
>
> Other things:
> 1. Cleanup Lucene site etc.
> 2. Coordinate with Sally and the ASF marketing team to do a press release.
>
> Probably some other things, too.
>
> -Grant
directly to REPO/mahout/mahout instead of moving to REPO/mahout.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Assuming it passes... (which it should.) We'll have some heavy lifting
> to do for a few days/weeks before any practical part of it is noticeable,
> just so people have reasonable expectations.
> >
> > What sort of things need to be addressed?
> >
> > Website: Sounds like Robin has a handle on the redesign
> >
> > SVN: Do we treat the move like a branch from /lucene/mahout to /mahout
> > initially, and then further commits to move things around as Benson
> > suggested?
>
> Yep. I can take care of the move when we are ready.
>
> >
> > Mailing lists: these are handled by infra or someone here.
>
> Yes, we need to open JIRA issues for these against INFRA.
>
>
> >
> > Jira, Confluence -- these stay largely the same, right?
>
> Jepp.
>
> >
> > People: committer accounts need to have a mahout group added.
>
> Jepp.
>
> >
> > I'll be happy to lend a hand where I can.
>
> We also need http://mahout.apache.org created.
>
> Other things:
> 1. Cleanup Lucene site etc.
> 2. Coordinate with Sally and the ASF marketing team to do a press release.
>
> Probably some other things, too.
>
> -Grant
+
Benson Margulies 2010-04-22, 00:04
