and contributors convenience should be golden IMO. I remember experiencing
a mild irritation when i was asked to resolve the conflicts on spark prs
because I felt they arose solely because the committer was taking too long
to review my PR and ok it. But if it were resulting from the project not
following simple KISS github PR workflow, it probably would be a bigger
and then imagine the overhead of explaining to every newcomer that they
should and why they should be PRing not against the master but something
else when every other ASF project accepts PRs against master...
I dunno... when working on github, any deviation from github commonly
accepted PR flows imo would be a fatal wound to the process.
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: