I've only tested with the training data in it's own collection, but it was
designed for multiple training sets in the same collection.
I suspect you're training set is too small to get a reliable model from.
The training sets we tested with were considerably larger.
All the idfs_ds values being the same seems odd though. The idfs_ds in
particular were designed to be accurate when there are multiple training
sets in the same collection.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Joe Obernberger <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: