|
|
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-06-02, 18:30
+
Thorsten Scherler 2011-06-05, 20:38
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-06-06, 04:20
+
Chapuis Bertil 2011-06-06, 06:59
-
[VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-08, 21:41
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-08, 21:41
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-09, 20:43
+
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-09, 21:05
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-09, 21:11
On 05/09/2011 04:05 PM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
> +1
>
> Richard, thanks a lot for all your work.
>
> For me everything is ok but I noted the release comes from the trunk on
> which I already applied 0.2 patches.
>
Right. However, there was at least one critical fix in trunk that hasn't
been merged over. Plus at the moment trunk builds, works, and passes all
tests. Since its our first release, might as well release the best we have.
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-09, 21:11
-
[VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-12, 20:30
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-12, 20:30
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-12, 23:03
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Thorsten Scherler 2011-05-19, 09:28
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:03 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: > On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > > A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the following > > artifacts up for a vote: > > > > SVN source tag (r1100814): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/> > > > Maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/> > > > Source release: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip> > > > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS> > > > > > Vote will be open for 7 days. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -1 > > Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. > > 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be there. > 2) A couple of files are missing headers > 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete > 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top > pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That > might help with problems #2 & #3. > > What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It > won't change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the > next release / release attempt. I tried the code and it works fine for me. Regarding the points you mentioned if they do not change the functional integrity then I say we fix them and do another release. However here my +1 for the functional part. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> codeBusters S.L. - web based systems <consulting, training and solutions> http://www.codebusters.es/
+
Thorsten Scherler 2011-05-19, 09:28
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 11:28
+1 release early, release often. On 19 May 2011 11:28, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:03 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: > > On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > > > A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the following > > > artifacts up for a vote: > > > > > > SVN source tag (r1100814): > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/> > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/> > > > > > Source release: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip> > > > > > > > > > > > PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS> > > > > > > > > Vote will be open for 7 days. > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > -1 > > > > Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. > > > > 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be > there. > > 2) A couple of files are missing headers > > 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete > > 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top > > pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That > > might help with problems #2 & #3. > > > > What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It > > won't change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the > > next release / release attempt. > > I tried the code and it works fine for me. Regarding the points you > mentioned if they do not change the functional integrity then I say we > fix them and do another release. However here my +1 for the functional > part. > > salu2 > -- > Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> > codeBusters S.L. - web based systems > <consulting, training and solutions> > http://www.codebusters.es/> > -- Bertil Chapuis Agimem Sàrl http://www.agimem.com
+
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 11:28
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-19, 15:31
On 05/19/2011 04:28 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:03 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: >>> A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the following >>> artifacts up for a vote: >>> >>> SVN source tag (r1100814): >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/>>> >>> Maven staging repo: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/>>> >>> Source release: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip>>> >>> >>> >>> PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS>>> >>> >>> Vote will be open for 7 days. >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> -1 >> >> Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. >> >> 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be there. >> 2) A couple of files are missing headers >> 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete >> 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top >> pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That >> might help with problems #2& #3. >> >> What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It >> won't change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the >> next release / release attempt. > > I tried the code and it works fine for me. Regarding the points you > mentioned if they do not change the functional integrity then I say we > fix them and do another release. However here my +1 for the functional > part. > > salu2 Yes, they don't change the functional part at all. However, this has to be sent to the IPMC for approval, and they'll probably send the release back down to us due to these issues. I can prepare a cleaned up release this weekend. How long of a vote do we want for that one?
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-19, 15:31
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 16:31
-1 for the reasons already given Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) On 19 May 2011, at 16:31, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/19/2011 04:28 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:03 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: >>> On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: >>>> A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the following >>>> artifacts up for a vote: >>>> >>>> SVN source tag (r1100814): >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/>>>> >>>> Maven staging repo: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/>>>> >>>> Source release: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS>>>> >>>> >>>> Vote will be open for 7 days. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> -1 >>> >>> Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. >>> >>> 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be there. >>> 2) A couple of files are missing headers >>> 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete >>> 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top >>> pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That >>> might help with problems #2& #3. >>> >>> What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It >>> won't change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the >>> next release / release attempt. >> >> I tried the code and it works fine for me. Regarding the points you >> mentioned if they do not change the functional integrity then I say we >> fix them and do another release. However here my +1 for the functional >> part. >> >> salu2 > > Yes, they don't change the functional part at all. However, this has to be sent to the IPMC for approval, and they'll probably send the release back down to us due to these issues. I can prepare a cleaned up release this weekend. How long of a vote do we want for that one?
+
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 16:31
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Eugen Paraschiv 2011-05-19, 18:27
+1 Related to the (non-functional) reasons not to release, I'm sure there may be a few. I can also understand the reasoning behind aiming for a perfect release. On the other hand, we have to take stock of the fact that this release process has been ongoing for a while now, and a perfect first release will postpone things more. Doing this release now rather then later, especially after years of 0.1, will preserve the existing momentum and will provide the experience necessary to do a better 0.2 release, of course assuming the minimal Apache standards are being met and the release goes forward. It will also allow 0.2 work to continue, which is the whole point. No, the release will not be as good as it would be if another month of careful work and cleanup goes into it, but at the end of the day it will be hugely better than no release at all. Release early release often indeed. Eugen. On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 for the reasons already given > > Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) > > On 19 May 2011, at 16:31, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 05/19/2011 04:28 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:03 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: > >>> On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > >>>> A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the > following > >>>> artifacts up for a vote: > >>>> > >>>> SVN source tag (r1100814): > >>>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/> >>>> > >>>> Maven staging repo: > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/> >>>> > >>>> Source release: > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): > >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Vote will be open for 7 days. > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>> > >>> -1 > >>> > >>> Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. > >>> > >>> 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be > there. > >>> 2) A couple of files are missing headers > >>> 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete > >>> 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top > >>> pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That > >>> might help with problems #2& #3. > >>> > >>> What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It > >>> won't change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the > >>> next release / release attempt. > >> > >> I tried the code and it works fine for me. Regarding the points you > >> mentioned if they do not change the functional integrity then I say we > >> fix them and do another release. However here my +1 for the functional > >> part. > >> > >> salu2 > > > > Yes, they don't change the functional part at all. However, this has to > be sent to the IPMC for approval, and they'll probably send the release back > down to us due to these issues. I can prepare a cleaned up release this > weekend. How long of a vote do we want for that one? >
+
Eugen Paraschiv 2011-05-19, 18:27
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Eugen Paraschiv 2011-05-18, 20:44
I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without any discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is getting close to the end, what is the next step from here? Thanks for moving this forward. Eugen. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On 05/12/2011 03:30 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote: > >> A 0.1-incubating release candidate has been created, with the following >> artifacts up for a vote: >> >> SVN source tag (r1100814): >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/>> >> Maven staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/>> >> Source release: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-031/org/apache/droids/droids/0.1-incubating/droids-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip>> >> >> >> PGP release keys (signed using D1323BDA): >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS>> >> >> Vote will be open for 7 days. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > -1 > > Looking through this, I'm starting to see problems with the release. > > 1) My svn threw extra crap into the source release that shouldn't be there. > 2) A couple of files are missing headers > 3) Not all of the NOTICE files are complete > 4) We really should pull everything that isn't referenced in our top > pom.xml out of that spot in SVN to create a clean source release. That might > help with problems #2 & #3. > > What do others think? I'm going to work on these issues tonight. It won't > change the code, but would change the release artifacts for the next release > / release attempt. >
+
Eugen Paraschiv 2011-05-18, 20:44
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-18, 20:54
On 05/18/2011 03:44 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
> I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without any
> discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is
> getting close to the end, what is the next step from here?
> Thanks for moving this forward.
> Eugen.
>
Glad to hear. Personally, I'm not happy with the actual release
artifacts. I should have paid closer attention when generating them. If
anyone has feedback on what needs to change in the release artifacts,
that would be great.
I've already fixed the missing license headers in trunk.
I've moved the code modules out of trunk that aren't referenced in the
root pom.
I will do a clean checkout so there isn't extra SVN crap in the source file.
The one piece that is still missing is moving the website out of trunk.
If this isn't done, we're shipping our website in the source archives
that are made available for download.
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-18, 20:54
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 07:13
Sorry for such a question, but I'm not sure to understand why we need a zip for the source release, since we already have the jars generated by the maven source plugin. About the site, the trunk contains the forrest documentation and the foundation for using the maven site plugin (src/site). It seems that storing the site in the src folder is a common practice but if the source archive is required, having two sites in it is not good. On 18 May 2011 22:54, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/18/2011 03:44 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote: > >> I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without any >> discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is >> getting close to the end, what is the next step from here? >> Thanks for moving this forward. >> Eugen. >> >> > Glad to hear. Personally, I'm not happy with the actual release artifacts. > I should have paid closer attention when generating them. If anyone has > feedback on what needs to change in the release artifacts, that would be > great. > > I've already fixed the missing license headers in trunk. > > I've moved the code modules out of trunk that aren't referenced in the root > pom. > > I will do a clean checkout so there isn't extra SVN crap in the source > file. > > The one piece that is still missing is moving the website out of trunk. If > this isn't done, we're shipping our website in the source archives that are > made available for download. > > -- Bertil Chapuis Agimem Sàrl http://www.agimem.com
+
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 07:13
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 07:29
ASF releases must include source Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) On 19 May 2011, at 08:13, Chapuis Bertil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for such a question, but I'm not sure to understand why we need a zip > for the source release, since we already have the jars generated by the > maven source plugin. > > About the site, the trunk contains the forrest documentation and the > foundation for using the maven site plugin (src/site). It seems that storing > the site in the src folder is a common practice but if the source archive is > required, having two sites in it is not good. > > > On 18 May 2011 22:54, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 05/18/2011 03:44 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote: >> >>> I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without any >>> discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is >>> getting close to the end, what is the next step from here? >>> Thanks for moving this forward. >>> Eugen. >>> >>> >> Glad to hear. Personally, I'm not happy with the actual release artifacts. >> I should have paid closer attention when generating them. If anyone has >> feedback on what needs to change in the release artifacts, that would be >> great. >> >> I've already fixed the missing license headers in trunk. >> >> I've moved the code modules out of trunk that aren't referenced in the root >> pom. >> >> I will do a clean checkout so there isn't extra SVN crap in the source >> file. >> >> The one piece that is still missing is moving the website out of trunk. If >> this isn't done, we're shipping our website in the source archives that are >> made available for download. >> >> > > > -- > Bertil Chapuis > Agimem Sàrl > http://www.agimem.com
+
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 07:29
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-19, 15:29
On 05/19/2011 02:29 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> ASF releases must include source
>
My understanding is that the official release is in fact just the
source. All of the binaries and other formats are just provided as a
courtesy.
+
Richard Frovarp 2011-05-19, 15:29
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 16:30
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 19 May 2011, at 16:29, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 02:29 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> ASF releases must include source
>>
>
> My understanding is that the official release is in fact just the source. All of the binaries and other formats are just provided as a courtesy.
You are correct - thanks
Ross
+
Ross Gardler 2011-05-19, 16:30
-
Re: [VOTE] Apache Droids 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 07:43
Ok thanks, it make sense to have an archive of the trunk. The sources are already contained in the jars generated by the maven source plugin. That's why I asked the question. On 19 May 2011 09:29, Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ASF releases must include source > > Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos) > > On 19 May 2011, at 08:13, Chapuis Bertil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sorry for such a question, but I'm not sure to understand why we need a > zip > > for the source release, since we already have the jars generated by the > > maven source plugin. > > > > About the site, the trunk contains the forrest documentation and the > > foundation for using the maven site plugin (src/site). It seems that > storing > > the site in the src folder is a common practice but if the source archive > is > > required, having two sites in it is not good. > > > > > > On 18 May 2011 22:54, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On 05/18/2011 03:44 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote: > >> > >>> I've been using the new incubator code for this past few days, without > any > >>> discernible *functional *problems for me. The 7 days voting period is > >>> getting close to the end, what is the next step from here? > >>> Thanks for moving this forward. > >>> Eugen. > >>> > >>> > >> Glad to hear. Personally, I'm not happy with the actual release > artifacts. > >> I should have paid closer attention when generating them. If anyone has > >> feedback on what needs to change in the release artifacts, that would be > >> great. > >> > >> I've already fixed the missing license headers in trunk. > >> > >> I've moved the code modules out of trunk that aren't referenced in the > root > >> pom. > >> > >> I will do a clean checkout so there isn't extra SVN crap in the source > >> file. > >> > >> The one piece that is still missing is moving the website out of trunk. > If > >> this isn't done, we're shipping our website in the source archives that > are > >> made available for download. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Bertil Chapuis > > Agimem Sàrl > > http://www.agimem.com> -- Bertil Chapuis Agimem Sàrl http://www.agimem.com
+
Chapuis Bertil 2011-05-19, 07:43
|
|
