+
Rifflard Mickaël 2005-05-10, 14:47
+
Rifflard Mickaël 2005-05-11, 06:34
+
Otis Gospodnetic 2005-05-11, 19:38
+
Rifflard Mickaël 2005-05-12, 07:13
-
RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectoryOtis Gospodnetic 2005-05-12, 07:37
Yes, try minMergeDocs = 1.... but keep in mind that you'll have to be
re-opening a new IndexReader every time your index changes, and it
sounds like this will be very frequent/constant. This may cost you...
Otis
--- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Otis,
>
> If I swap these two lines, the result is the same.
>
> I want to build an indexing process as fast as possible and I can't
> use
> a greater minMergeDocs because my need is to know all documents of my
>
> index in real time.
>
> Do you think that a FSDirectory with minMergeDocs equals to 1 can
> be the solution ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Micka���l
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoy��� : mercredi 11 mai 2005 21:38
> ��� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory
>
>
> What happens if you swap these 2 lines?
>
> System.out.println("Docs number : " + ir.numDocs());
> ir.close();
>
> If I were you, I'd try using minMergeDocs instead of RAMDirectory.
> It
> makes things much simpler. You shouldn't need to optimize the index.
>
>
> Otis
>
> --- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Otis,
> >
> > My question was too much short cut.
> >
> > Here is a sample :
> >
> > import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter;
> > import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader;
> > import org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory;
> > import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer;
> > import java.io.IOException;
> >
> > public class MySample {
> > public static void main(String[] args) {
> > try {
> > RAMDirectory ramd = new RAMDirectory();
> > IndexWriter iw = new IndexWriter(ramd,new
> > StandardAnalyzer(),true);
> > iw.minMergeDocs = 1;
> > iw.addDocument(new org.apache.lucene.document.Document());
> >
> > IndexReader ir = IndexReader.open(ramd);
> > System.out.println("Docs number : " + ir.numDocs());
> > ir.close();
> > iw.close();
> > }
> > catch (IOException ioe) { ioe.printStackTrace(); }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > If I execute this sample, the result is :
> >
> > Docs number : 0
> >
> > If a call close() method or optimize() method after added my
> > document, the result is :
> >
> > Docs number : 1
> >
> > So, my question is : How to get the second result without close()
> or
> > optimize() index
> > (expensive methods I think) ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Micka���l
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Envoy��� : mardi 10 mai 2005 17:39
> > ��� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : Re: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory
> >
> >
> > Hi Micka���l,
> >
> > Have you tried using minMergeDocs=1 ? Will that do what you want?
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > --- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is it possible, with the RAMDirectory (or another Directory), to
> > > "flush" informations after each Document indexing ?
> > > I tried this but this "flush" appears to be able to be made after
> 2
> > > indexing at best.
> > >
> > > What do you think about it ? I forgot a configuration ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Micka���l
> > >
> > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
re-opening a new IndexReader every time your index changes, and it
sounds like this will be very frequent/constant. This may cost you...
Otis
--- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Otis,
>
> If I swap these two lines, the result is the same.
>
> I want to build an indexing process as fast as possible and I can't
> use
> a greater minMergeDocs because my need is to know all documents of my
>
> index in real time.
>
> Do you think that a FSDirectory with minMergeDocs equals to 1 can
> be the solution ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Micka���l
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoy��� : mercredi 11 mai 2005 21:38
> ��� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : RE: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory
>
>
> What happens if you swap these 2 lines?
>
> System.out.println("Docs number : " + ir.numDocs());
> ir.close();
>
> If I were you, I'd try using minMergeDocs instead of RAMDirectory.
> It
> makes things much simpler. You shouldn't need to optimize the index.
>
>
> Otis
>
> --- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Otis,
> >
> > My question was too much short cut.
> >
> > Here is a sample :
> >
> > import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter;
> > import org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader;
> > import org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory;
> > import org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer;
> > import java.io.IOException;
> >
> > public class MySample {
> > public static void main(String[] args) {
> > try {
> > RAMDirectory ramd = new RAMDirectory();
> > IndexWriter iw = new IndexWriter(ramd,new
> > StandardAnalyzer(),true);
> > iw.minMergeDocs = 1;
> > iw.addDocument(new org.apache.lucene.document.Document());
> >
> > IndexReader ir = IndexReader.open(ramd);
> > System.out.println("Docs number : " + ir.numDocs());
> > ir.close();
> > iw.close();
> > }
> > catch (IOException ioe) { ioe.printStackTrace(); }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > If I execute this sample, the result is :
> >
> > Docs number : 0
> >
> > If a call close() method or optimize() method after added my
> > document, the result is :
> >
> > Docs number : 1
> >
> > So, my question is : How to get the second result without close()
> or
> > optimize() index
> > (expensive methods I think) ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Micka���l
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Envoy��� : mardi 10 mai 2005 17:39
> > ��� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Objet : Re: Real time indexing with RAMDirectory
> >
> >
> > Hi Micka���l,
> >
> > Have you tried using minMergeDocs=1 ? Will that do what you want?
> >
> > Otis
> >
> > --- Rifflard Micka���l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Is it possible, with the RAMDirectory (or another Directory), to
> > > "flush" informations after each Document indexing ?
> > > I tried this but this "flush" appears to be able to be made after
> 2
> > > indexing at best.
> > >
> > > What do you think about it ? I forgot a configuration ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Micka���l
> > >
> > >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+
Otis Gospodnetic 2005-05-10, 15:39
