Hello,

I need to know that if I use ClassicTokenizer instead of StandardTokenizer
then what things I will loose. Is it the case that in future solr versions
ClassicTokenizer will be deprecated? or development in ClassicTokenizer is
going to halt? Please let me know this.

--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/What-we-loose-if-we-use-ClassicTokenizer-instead-of-StandardTokenizer-tp3990249.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

You're asking us to predict the future, which if I could I'd be rich enough
to build a mansion. If it's not marked as deprecated in 4.x or trunk, so it
doesn't look like there's any plans to deprecate it. Although what the future
holds is a good question..

I'd _strongly_ advise that you look at the admin/analysis page with the two
tokenizers to get a feel for how they behave, I find a few minutes playing
around there gives me a better sense of what's going on than descriptions...

Best
Erick

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Alok Bhandari
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to know that if I use ClassicTokenizer instead of StandardTokenizer
> then what things I will loose. Is it the case that in future solr versions
> ClassicTokenizer will be deprecated? or development in ClassicTokenizer is
> going to halt? Please let me know this.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/What-we-loose-if-we-use-ClassicTokenizer-instead-of-StandardTokenizer-tp3990249.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

thanks for the reply. Yes I have started the admin/analysis thing before you
suggested but just wanted to know if out of the box anything specific is
notsupported/supported by the tokenizers specified.

--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/What-we-loose-if-we-use-ClassicTokenizer-instead-of-StandardTokenizer-tp3990249p3990278.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.