Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.

My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its because
of my sort function or something else.

My query consists of:
sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
And I get back 4571232 hits.
All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their data.
 Does termfreq not support phrases?
If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
>
> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to do it
> > without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get a
> sorted
> > list without searching for any terms?
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
>

--
- sent from my mobile
6176064373

On 8/8/2011 4:34 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
>
> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its because
> of my sort function or something else.
>
> My query consists of:
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> And I get back 4571232 hits.

That would be the total number of docs, I guess.
Since your query is *:*, ie "find everything".

> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their data.

You are only sorting on termfreq of indie music, you are not querying
documents that contain it.

> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
>
> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> because of my sort function or something else.
>
> My query consists of:
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> And I get back 4571232 hits.

That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..

> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their data.
>  Does termfreq not support phrases?

No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know how
this function parses your input but it might not understand your + escape and
think it's one term constisting of exactly that.

> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?

You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using the
shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index size and
number of unique terms.

>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko <
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> >
> > 2011/8/8 Jason Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > > specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to do
> > > it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get
> > > a
> >
> > sorted
> >
> > > list without searching for any terms?
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> > 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533

Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase  searches, I
don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
from a function.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus Jelsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> > Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> >
> > My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> > because of my sort function or something else.
> >
> > My query consists of:
> > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> > And I get back 4571232 hits.
>
> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..
>
> > All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their
> data.
> >  Does termfreq not support phrases?
>
> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know how
> this function parses your input but it might not understand your + escape
> and
> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
>
> > If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
>
> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using the
> shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index size
> and
> number of unique terms.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko <
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > >
> > > 2011/8/8 Jason Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > > > specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to
> do
> > > > it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get
> > > > a
> > >
> > > sorted
> > >
> > > > list without searching for any terms?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> > > 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
>

--
- sent from my mobile
6176064373

> Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase  searches, I
> don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
> from a function.

Executing a Lucene phrase query is not the same as term frequency (phrase !=
term). A phrase consists of multiple terms and Lucene has an inverted term
index, not an inverted phrase index (unless your index your data that way).

>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus Jelsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> > >
> > > My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> > > because of my sort function or something else.
> > >
> > > My query consists of:
> > > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> > > And I get back 4571232 hits.
> >
> > That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..
> >
> > > All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their
> >
> > data.
> >
> > >  Does termfreq not support phrases?
> >
> > No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know
> > how this function parses your input but it might not understand your +
> > escape and
> > think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
> >
> > > If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
> >
> > You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using the
> > shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index size
> > and
> > number of unique terms.
> >
> > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko <
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > > >
> > > > 2011/8/8 Jason Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > > I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > > > > specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to
> >
> > do
> >
> > > > > it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to
> > > > > get a
> > > >
> > > > sorted
> > > >
> > > > > list without searching for any terms?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> > > > 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533

Dismax queries can. But

sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')

is not using dismax.  Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not familiar with the termfreq function.

To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on how lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how different indexing choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In Action is a pretty good book.

On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase  searches, I
> don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
> from a function.
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus Jelsma<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
>>>
>>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
>>> because of my sort function or something else.
>>>
>>> My query consists of:
>>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
>>> And I get back 4571232 hits.
>> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..
>>
>>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their
>> data.
>>>   Does termfreq not support phrases?
>> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know how
>> this function parses your input but it might not understand your + escape
>> and
>> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
>>
>>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
>> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using the
>> shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index size
>> and
>> number of unique terms.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko<
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
>>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
>>>>
>>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
>>>>> specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to
>> do
>>>>> it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get
>>>>> a
>>>> sorted
>>>>
>>>>> list without searching for any terms?
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
>>>> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
>
>

> Dismax queries can. But
>
> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
>
> is not using dismax.  Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not
> familiar with the termfreq function.

It simply returns the TF of the given _term_  as it is indexed of the current
document.

Sorting on TF like this seems strange as by default queries are already sorted
that way since TF plays a big role in the final score.

>
> To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on how
> lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how different
> indexing choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In Action
> is a pretty good book.
>
> On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> > Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> > index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase  searches, I
> > don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access phrases
> > from a function.
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus
Jelsma<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> >>>
> >>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> >>> because of my sort function or something else.
> >>>
> >>> My query consists of:
> >>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> >>> And I get back 4571232 hits.
> >>
> >> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..
> >>
> >>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their
> >>
> >> data.
> >>
> >>>   Does termfreq not support phrases?
> >>
> >> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know
> >> how this function parses your input but it might not understand your +
> >> escape and
> >> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
> >>
> >>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
> >>
> >> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using
> >> the shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your index
> >> size and
> >> number of unique terms.
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko<
> >>>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> >>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> >>>>> specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to
> >>
> >> do
> >>
> >>>>> it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to get
> >>>>> a
> >>>>
> >>>> sorted
> >>>>
> >>>>> list without searching for any terms?
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> >>>> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533

I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.

 When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top results I see only
1 or 2 mentions of "indie music", but when I look further down the list I do
see other docs that have more occurrences of "indie music".
So I a want to test by comparing the the different queries versus seeing a
list of docs ranked specifically by the count of occurrences of the phrase
"indie music"

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Markus Jelsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

>
> > Dismax queries can. But
> >
> > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
> >
> > is not using dismax.  Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not
> > familiar with the termfreq function.
>
> It simply returns the TF of the given _term_  as it is indexed of the
> current
> document.
>
> Sorting on TF like this seems strange as by default queries are already
> sorted
> that way since TF plays a big role in the final score.
>
> >
> > To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on how
> > lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how different
> > indexing choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In Action
> > is a pretty good book.
> >
> > On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> > > Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> > > index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase  searches,
> I
> > > don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access
> phrases
> > > from a function.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus
> Jelsma<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > >>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> > >>>
> > >>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if its
> > >>> because of my sort function or something else.
> > >>>
> > >>> My query consists of:
> > >>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> > >>> And I get back 4571232 hits.
> > >>
> > >> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work but..
> > >>
> > >>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in their
> > >>
> > >> data.
> > >>
> > >>>   Does termfreq not support phrases?
> > >>
> > >> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't know
> > >> how this function parses your input but it might not understand your +
> > >> escape and
> > >> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
> > >>
> > >>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
> > >>
> > >> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term using
> > >> the shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your
> index
> > >> size and
> > >> number of unique terms.
> > >>
> > >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko<
> > >>>
> > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> > >>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > >>>>> specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable to
> > >>
> > >> do
> > >>
> > >>>>> it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to
> get
> > >>>>> a
> > >>>>
> > >>>> sorted
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> list without searching for any terms?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> > >>>> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
>

--
- sent from my mobile
6176064373

If your want to understand and debug the scoring you can use debugQuery=true
to see how different documents score. Most of the time docs with both terms are
on top of the result set unless norms are interferring.

To understand your should check the Solr relevancy wiki but the Lucene docs
are much better although very low level.

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyCookbook
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_1_0/api/core/org/apache/lucene/search/Similarity.html

Your question is more a relevance question than about the termfreq function.
To be short, don't use those kind of functions if you don't yet understand
similarity as describe in the Lucene docs.

> I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.
>
>  When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
> with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
> I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top results I see only
> 1 or 2 mentions of "indie music", but when I look further down the list I
> do see other docs that have more occurrences of "indie music".
> So I a want to test by comparing the the different queries versus seeing a
> list of docs ranked specifically by the count of occurrences of the phrase
> "indie music"
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Markus Jelsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > Dismax queries can. But
> > >
> > > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
> > >
> > > is not using dismax.  Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not
> > > familiar with the termfreq function.
> >
> > It simply returns the TF of the given _term_  as it is indexed of the
> > current
> > document.
> >
> > Sorting on TF like this seems strange as by default queries are already
> > sorted
> > that way since TF plays a big role in the final score.
> >
> > > To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on
> > > how lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how
> > > different indexing choices effect what is possible at query time.
> > > Lucene In Action is a pretty good book.
> > >
> > > On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> > > > Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> > > > index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase
> > > > searches,
> >
> > I
> >
> > > > don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access
> >
> > phrases
> >
> > > > from a function.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus
> >
> > Jelsma<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > >>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if
> > > >>> its because of my sort function or something else.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> My query consists of:
> > > >>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> > > >>> And I get back 4571232 hits.
> > > >>
> > > >> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work
> > > >> but..
> > > >>
> > > >>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in
> > > >>> their
> > > >>
> > > >> data.
> > > >>
> > > >>>   Does termfreq not support phrases?
> > > >>
> > > >> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't
> > > >> know how this function parses your input but it might not
> > > >> understand your + escape and
> > > >> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
> > > >>
> > > >>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
> > > >>
> > > >> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term
> > > >> using the shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase
> > > >> your
> >
> > index
> >
> > > >> size and
> > > >> number of unique terms.
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko<
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> > > >>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>>

are you boosting your docs?

2011/8/8 Jason Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I am trying to test out and compare different sorts and scoring.
>
>  When I use dismax to search for "indie music"
> with: qf=all_lists_text&q="indie+music"&defType=dismax&rows=100
> I see some stuff that seems "irrelevant", meaning in top results I see only
> 1 or 2 mentions of "indie music", but when I look further down the list I
> do
> see other docs that have more occurrences of "indie music".
> So I a want to test by comparing the the different queries versus seeing a
> list of docs ranked specifically by the count of occurrences of the phrase
> "indie music"
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Markus Jelsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > > Dismax queries can. But
> > >
> > > sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')
> > >
> > > is not using dismax.  Apparenty termfreq function can not? I am not
> > > familiar with the termfreq function.
> >
> > It simply returns the TF of the given _term_  as it is indexed of the
> > current
> > document.
> >
> > Sorting on TF like this seems strange as by default queries are already
> > sorted
> > that way since TF plays a big role in the final score.
> >
> > >
> > > To understand why you'd need to reindex, you might want to read up on
> how
> > > lucene actually works, to get a basic understanding of how different
> > > indexing choices effect what is possible at query time. Lucene In
> Action
> > > is a pretty good book.
> > >
> > > On 8/8/2011 5:02 PM, Jason Toy wrote:
> > > > Are not  Dismax queries able to search for phrases using the default
> > > > index(which is what I am using?) If I can already do phrase
>  searches,
> > I
> > > > don't understand why I would need to reindex t be able to access
> > phrases
> > > > from a function.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Markus
> > Jelsma<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > >>> Aelexei, thank you , that does seem to work.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> My sort results seem to be totally wrong though, I'm not sure if
> its
> > > >>> because of my sort function or something else.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> My query consists of:
> > > >>> sort=termfreq(all_lists_text,'indie+music')+desc&q=*:*&rows=100
> > > >>> And I get back 4571232 hits.
> > > >>
> > > >> That's normal, you issue a catch all query. Sorting should work
> but..
> > > >>
> > > >>> All the results don't have the phrase "indie music" anywhere in
> their
> > > >>
> > > >> data.
> > > >>
> > > >>>   Does termfreq not support phrases?
> > > >>
> > > >> No, it is TERM frequency and indie music is not one term. I don't
> know
> > > >> how this function parses your input but it might not understand your
> +
> > > >> escape and
> > > >> think it's one term constisting of exactly that.
> > > >>
> > > >>> If not, how can I sort specifically by termfreq of a phrase?
> > > >>
> > > >> You cannot. What you can do is index multiple terms as one term
> using
> > > >> the shingle filter. Take care, it can significantly increase your
> > index
> > > >> size and
> > > >> number of unique terms.
> > > >>
> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Alexei Martchenko<
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  wrote:
> > > >>>> You can use the standard query parser and pass q=*:*
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2011/8/8 Jason Toy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I am trying to list some data based on a function I run ,
> > > >>>>> specifically  termfreq(post_text,'indie music')  and I am unable
> to
> > > >>
> > > >> do
> > > >>
> > > >>>>> it without passing in data to the q paramater.  Is it possible to
> > get
> > > >>>>> a
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> sorted
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> list without searching for any terms?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> *Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
> > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
> > > >>>> 5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533
> >
>
>
>
> --
> - sent from my mobile
> 6176064373
>

--

*Alexei Martchenko* | *CEO* | Superdownloads
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (11)
5083.1018/5080.3535/5080.3533