Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Lucene and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Solr, mail # user - Kinda running


+
Grant Ingersoll 2006-02-23, 03:02
+
Chris Hostetter 2006-02-23, 06:39
+
Grant Ingersoll 2006-02-24, 02:14
+
Yonik Seeley 2006-02-24, 02:47
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Kinda running
Yonik Seeley 2006-02-24, 02:53
> For analyzers, they can be reused, so no factory is necessary.

To be more specific, I actually added a new comment in the example
schema.xml that shows how:

    <!-- One could also specify an existing Analyzer implementation in Java
         via the class attribute on the analyzer element:
    <fieldtype name="text_lu" class="solr.TextField">
      <analyzer class="org.apache.lucene.analysis.snowball.SnowballAnalyzer"/>
    </fieldType>
    -->

In general, my preference would be to have flexible
TokenFilterFactories that people can combine to create their custom
analyzers, rather than specifying a single java Analyzer class.  But
one size doesn't fit all, hence the ability still exists.
+
Chris Hostetter 2006-02-23, 07:19
+
Grant Ingersoll 2006-02-24, 01:31
+
Yonik Seeley 2006-02-24, 01:54
+
Yonik Seeley 2006-02-23, 15:20