-
Re: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #14: POMs out of syncDawid Weiss 2012-06-29, 21:13
This is odd, really. I'll take a look but not today.
Dawid
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, this is likely a Maven Surefire-only problem.
>
> I'm clueless about the interaction between Surefire your randomized runner, Dawid - should this test be ignored under Surefire? Under other test runners too, maybe? (IntelliJ, Eclipse)
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #14: POMs out of sync
>
> Dawid,
>
> You checked in changes to this test (TestMaxFailuresRule.java) at revision 1355279.
>
> This Jenkins Maven build's checked out svn revision is 1355359.
>
> So it looks like there might be a problem with your commit?
>
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #14: POMs out of sync
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/14/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.TestMaxFailuresRule.testMaxFailures
>
> Error Message:
> expected:<100> but was:<1>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<100> but was:<1>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.TestMaxFailuresRule.testMaxFailures(TestMaxFailuresRule.java:64)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:134)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
Dawid
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, this is likely a Maven Surefire-only problem.
>
> I'm clueless about the interaction between Surefire your randomized runner, Dawid - should this test be ignored under Surefire? Under other test runners too, maybe? (IntelliJ, Eclipse)
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #14: POMs out of sync
>
> Dawid,
>
> You checked in changes to this test (TestMaxFailuresRule.java) at revision 1355279.
>
> This Jenkins Maven build's checked out svn revision is 1355359.
>
> So it looks like there might be a problem with your commit?
>
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 11:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JENKINS-MAVEN] Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x #14: POMs out of sync
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-4.x/14/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED: org.apache.lucene.util.TestMaxFailuresRule.testMaxFailures
>
> Error Message:
> expected:<100> but was:<1>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<100> but was:<1>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.TestMaxFailuresRule.testMaxFailures(TestMaxFailuresRule.java:64)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:53)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:134)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
