A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get method
bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
OpenBitSet.fastGet.

I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit it if  
there are no objections.

Mike

Jason Rutherglen wrote:

> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get method
> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Isn't that depending on Java 1.5 ?

Andi..

On Feb 3, 2009, at 11:38, Michael McCandless  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit it  
> if there are no objections.
>
> Mike
>
> Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>
>> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get method
>> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
>> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you mean the assert statement?  That's available since 1.4.

Mike

Andi Vajda wrote:

> Isn't that depending on Java 1.5 ?
>
> Andi..
>
> On Feb 3, 2009, at 11:38, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit it  
>> if there are no objections.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>>
>>> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get  
>>> method
>>> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
>>> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:

> Do you mean the assert statement?  That's available since 1.4.

Yeah, that's what I meant. 1.5 vs 1.4 is getting blurry :)

Andi..

>
> Mike
>
> Andi Vajda wrote:
>
>> Isn't that depending on Java 1.5 ?
>>
>> Andi..
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2009, at 11:38, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit it if
>>> there are no objections.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>>>
>>>> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get method
>>>> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
>>>> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Tell me about it!  We gotta get 2.9/3.0 out, so we can switch to 1.5.  
The 1.5/1.6 line is less blurry :)

Mike

Andi Vajda wrote:

>
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> Do you mean the assert statement?  That's available since 1.4.
>
> Yeah, that's what I meant. 1.5 vs 1.4 is getting blurry :)
>
> Andi..
>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Andi Vajda wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't that depending on Java 1.5 ?
>>> Andi..
>>> On Feb 3, 2009, at 11:38, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > wrote:
>>>> I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit  
>>>> it if there are no objections.
>>>> Mike
>>>> Jason Rutherglen wrote:
>>>>> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get  
>>>>> method
>>>>> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
>>>>> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Andi,

> Isn't that depending on Java 1.5 ?

Assertions work since Java 1.4 I think. We have a lot of assertions in code.
And it would not compile with -source 1.4, as we do.

> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think that makes sense.  I'll wait a day or so and then commit it
> > if there are no objections.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> >
> >> A simple way to make BitVector faster would be to turn the get method
> >> bounds checking into an assertion. This is similar to
> >> OpenBitSet.fastGet.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------