Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3876 for this,
didn't have the time to look into it.
Dawid

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12765/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterExceptions.testIllegalPositions
>
> Error Message:
> position=-2 lastPosition=0
>
> Stack Trace:
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner$3.addError(JUnitTestRunner.java:974)
>        at junit.framework.TestResult.addError(TestResult.java:38)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapterCache$1.testFailure(JUnit4TestAdapterCache.java:51)
>        at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$4.notifyListener(RunNotifier.java:100)
>        at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier$SafeNotifier.run(RunNotifier.java:41)
>        at org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier.fireTestFailure(RunNotifier.java:97)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.EachTestNotifier.addFailure(EachTestNotifier.java:26)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:267)
>        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:164)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:51)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:21)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:22)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:743)
> Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: position=-2 lastPosition=0
>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40PostingsWriter.addPosition(Lucene40PostingsWriter.java:215)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.FreqProxTermsWriterPerField.flush(FreqProxTermsWriterPerField.java:519)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.FreqProxTermsWriter.flush(FreqProxTermsWriter.java:92)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.TermsHash.flush(TermsHash.java:117)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocInverter.flush(DocInverter.java:53)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocFieldProcessor.flush(DocFieldProcessor.java:81)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterPerThread.flush(DocumentsWriterPerThread.java:475)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.doFlush(DocumentsWriter.java:422)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.flushAllThreads(DocumentsWriter.java:553)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.doFlush(IndexWriter.java:2640)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.flush(IndexWriter.java:2616)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.closeInternal(IndexWriter.java:851)

> java.lang.NullPointerException
>        at java.util.HashSet.<init>(HashSet.java:116)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.<init>(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:46)

Errrr.... premature commitingaction? Checking.

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

without the huge linedocs file... yay :)

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12863/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.charfilter.HTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRandomHugeStrings
>
> Error Message:
> Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-9,5,]
>
> Stack Trace:
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$UncaughtExceptionsInBackgroundThread: Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-9,5,]
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:83)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:516)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:146)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:74)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:36)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:67)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:743)
> Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: finalOffset  expected:<8040> but was:<8035>
>        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.assertTokenStreamContents(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:182)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:563)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.access$000(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:50)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase$AnalysisThread.run(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:335)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 11211 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

AFAICT this is fixed by the changes I just committed under LUCENE-3913.  At a minimum, I can't reproduce locally - the following repro string from the failed Jenkins job log (without the "-Dtestmethod=null", not included below) succeeds for me:

ant test -Dtestcase=HTMLStripCharFilterTest -Dtests.seed=48bbf57c15b7aa2d:5bb640584c81078d:-7e916259eafd7e54 -Dtests.multiplier=5 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=ISO8859-1"

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 12863 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12863/

1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.charfilter.HTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRandomHugeStrings

Error Message:
Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-9,5,]

Stack Trace:
org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$UncaughtExceptionsInBackgroundThread: Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-9,5,]
at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:83)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$RememberThreadRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:516)
at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:146)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:74)
at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:36)
at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:67)
at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:743)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: finalOffset  expected:<8040> but was:<8035>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.assertTokenStreamContents(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:182)
at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:563)
at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.access$000(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:50)
at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase$AnalysisThread.run(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:335)
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 11211 lines...]

bq. Dtestmethod=null", not included below)

I've just fixed that.

D.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks David!

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dawid Weiss
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 12863 - Failure

bq. Dtestmethod=null", not included below)

I've just fixed that.

D.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm digging...

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x-java7/2112/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.kuromoji.TestKuromojiTokenizer.testRandomHugeStrings
>
> Error Message:
> Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-21,5,]
>
> Stack Trace:
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$UncaughtExceptionsInBackgroundThread: Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-21,5,]
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:83)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:508)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:146)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:74)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:36)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:67)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:743)
> Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.RollingCharBuffer.get(RollingCharBuffer.java:95)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.kuromoji.KuromojiTokenizer.parse(KuromojiTokenizer.java:595)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.kuromoji.KuromojiTokenizer.incrementToken(KuromojiTokenizer.java:445)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:422)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:394)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.access$000(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:50)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase$AnalysisThread.run(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:335)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 11330 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I already committed a fix a while ago, but this run didnt pick it up:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305647&view=rev

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12881/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 23102 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The front page for this Jenkins build says:

---------
Revisions
    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly : 1305640
    http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x : 1305622
---------

So the build started before r1305647 was committed.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 7:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x - Build # 12881 - Failure

I already committed a fix a while ago, but this run didnt pick it up:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305647&view=rev

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12881/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 23102 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Someone created 179 test failures! Please run 'ant test' before committing!

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/12895/
>
> 179 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest.testNotLazyField
>
> Error Message:
> Null Request Handler 'null'
>
> Stack Trace:
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Null Request Handler 'null'
>        at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1531)
>        at org.apache.solr.BasicFunctionalityTest.testNotLazyField(BasicFunctionalityTest.java:614)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
>        at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:754)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:670)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:591)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:642)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:164)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)

lucidimagination.com

I committed a fix (commented out this test).

SynFilter can't yet consume graphs...

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13007/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.synonym.TestSynonymMapFilter.testRandom2GraphBefore
>
> Error Message:
> Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-742,5,]
>
> Stack Trace:
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$UncaughtExceptionsInBackgroundThread: Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-742,5,]
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:84)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:642)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
>        at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:164)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCaseRunner.runChild(LuceneTestCaseRunner.java:57)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
>        at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
>        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
>        at junit.framework.JUnit4TestAdapter.run(JUnit4TestAdapter.java:39)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.run(JUnitTestRunner.java:420)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.launch(JUnitTestRunner.java:911)
>        at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner.main(JUnitTestRunner.java:743)
> Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<9> but was:<17>
>        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:472)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:456)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.assertTokenStreamContents(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:210)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:612)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:440)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.access$000(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:53)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase$AnalysisThread.run(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:381)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 3513 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13082/
>
> 2 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
>
> Error Message:
> java.lang.AssertionError: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane FieldCache usage(s) found expected:<0> but was:<1>

Does anyone know when this isane fieldcache stuff started happening
and if it's even a bug in these cases?
Would be helpful if the exception gave the actual field name that it
thinks is the issue.

-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13082/
> >
> > 2 tests failed.
> > REGRESSION:
>  org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
> >
> > Error Message:
> > java.lang.AssertionError:
> org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane
> FieldCache usage(s) found expected:<0> but was:<1>
>
> Does anyone know when this isane fieldcache stuff started happening
> and if it's even a bug in these cases?
> Would be helpful if the exception gave the actual field name that it
> thinks is the issue.
>

It seems the information about the insanity is dumped to System.err.  I
found this in the log:

[junit] *** BEGIN
org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane
FieldCache usage(s) ***
    [junit] SUBREADER: Found caches for descendants of
StandardDirectoryReader(segments_2:10:nrt _0(4.0):C10 _1(4.0):C10
_2(4.0):C5)+a_si
    [junit] 'StandardDirectoryReader(segments_2:10:nrt _0(4.0):C10
_1(4.0):C10 _2(4.0):C5)'=>'a_si',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#210835782
(size =~ 280 bytes)
    [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_1(4.0):C10)'=>'a_si',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#779556647
(size =~ 240 bytes)
    [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_2(4.0):C5)'=>'a_si',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#281632313
(size =~ 232 bytes)
    [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_0(4.0):C10)'=>'a_si',class
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#168970524
(size =~ 264 bytes)
    [junit]
    [junit] *** END
org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane
FieldCache usage(s) ***
So it sees to be the field a_si, assuming I understand how it all works.
> -Yonik
> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
> Boston May 7-10
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

Also, looking back through the failed build reports, this seems to have
begun on April 1st (in my part of the world).

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Chris Male <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Build:
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13082/
>> >
>> > 2 tests failed.
>> > REGRESSION:
>>  org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch
>> >
>> > Error Message:
>> > java.lang.AssertionError:
>> org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane
>> FieldCache usage(s) found expected:<0> but was:<1>
>>
>> Does anyone know when this isane fieldcache stuff started happening
>> and if it's even a bug in these cases?
>> Would be helpful if the exception gave the actual field name that it
>> thinks is the issue.
>>
>
> It seems the information about the insanity is dumped to System.err.  I
> found this in the log:
>
> [junit] *** BEGIN org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane FieldCache usage(s) ***
>     [junit] SUBREADER: Found caches for descendants of StandardDirectoryReader(segments_2:10:nrt _0(4.0):C10 _1(4.0):C10 _2(4.0):C5)+a_si
>     [junit] 'StandardDirectoryReader(segments_2:10:nrt _0(4.0):C10 _1(4.0):C10 _2(4.0):C5)'=>'a_si',class org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#210835782 (size =~ 280 bytes)
>     [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_1(4.0):C10)'=>'a_si',class org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#779556647 (size =~ 240 bytes)
>     [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_2(4.0):C5)'=>'a_si',class org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#281632313 (size =~ 232 bytes)
>     [junit] 'SegmentCoreReader(owner=_0(4.0):C10)'=>'a_si',class org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCache$DocTermsIndex,true=>org.apache.lucene.search.FieldCacheImpl$DocTermsIndexImpl#168970524 (size =~ 264 bytes)
>     [junit]
>     [junit] *** END org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.testDistribSearch: Insane FieldCache usage(s) ***
>
>
> So it sees to be the field a_si, assuming I understand how it all works.
>
>
>> -Yonik
>> lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
>> Boston May 7-10
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
>

--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

I purged the field cache for these tests since "insanity" would often
be a normal outcome since we're sorting, faceting, getting stats, etc,
on the same field.

But I think there may be something wrong with the fieldcache insanity
checker stuff...  maybe it has to do with all the recent
reader/context refactoring in Lucene?  I couldn't get it to fail even
when I tried by adding things I knew would use both top-level and
segment field caches.  Not high priority though - the uses of top
fieldcaches are explicit in solr.

-Yonik
lucenerevolution.com - Lucene/Solr Open Source Search Conference.
Boston May 7-10

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> Rat problems were found!

Ok, these are headers -- I'll fix.

Dawid
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13160/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 14820 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a test failure --

org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest

What's interesting is that it's a suite-level failure (happened in an
@AfterClass hook). Can we tell jenkins to store certain artifacts
after a build is completed? Those detailed execution logs would be
nice (or those HTML5 reports).

Dawid
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2233/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 10982 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Specifically, it's this one again. I'll file an issue about "<<<
FAILURES" not being present here, seems like they're not logged for
suite-level errors.

   [junit4] ERROR   0.00s J1 | BasicDistributedZkTest (suite)
   [junit4]    > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: ERROR:
SolrIndexSearcher opens=93 closes=91
   [junit4]    > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([59150493F236873A]:0)
   [junit4]    > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.endTrackingSearchers(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:212)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.afterClassSolrTestCase(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:101)
   [junit4]    > at
sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor13.invoke(Unknown Source)
   [junit4]    > at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
   [junit4]    > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1844)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1000(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:679)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
   [junit4]    > at
org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:553)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
   [junit4]    > at
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:499)
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Dawid Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a test failure --
>
> org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest
>
> What's interesting is that it's a suite-level failure (happened in an
> @AfterClass hook). Can we tell jenkins to store certain artifacts
> after a build is completed? Those detailed execution logs would be
> nice (or those HTML5 reports).
>
> Dawid
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2233/
>>
>> No tests ran.
>>
>> Build Log (for compile errors):
>> [...truncated 10982 lines...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Looks like the shell scripts in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff
from LUCENE-3808???

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 20724 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is borken now or not called at all.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>
> Looks like the shell scripts in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be modified to
> call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from LUCENE-3808???
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Build:
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162/
> >
> > No tests ran.
> >
> > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> lucidimagination.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The problem is:

  -Djunit.formatter=xml \

This is ignored now, so Jenkins does not get the XML test results.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>
> I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is borken now or
> not called at all.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 -
> > Still Failing
> >
> > Looks like the shell scripts in
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from
> LUCENE-3808???
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Build:
> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162/
> > >
> > > No tests ran.
> > >
> > > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > lucidimagination.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you need these? I can re-enable them, I just didn't think anybody
was using them. Check out the HTML5 reports though, Uwe.

If you need ant-report XMLs, uncomment this in common-biuld.xml:

                <!-- XML reports compatible with ant-report task. We
don't use ant-report anyway so I omit these. -->
                <!--
                <report-ant-xml dir="@{junit.output.dir}" />
                -->

Dawid

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is:
>
>  -Djunit.formatter=xml \
>
> This is ignored now, so Jenkins does not get the XML test results.
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:17 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>>
>> I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is borken now or
>> not called at all.
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 -
>> > Still Failing
>> >
>> > Looks like the shell scripts in
>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
>> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from
>> LUCENE-3808???
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > Build:
>> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162/
>> > >
>> > > No tests ran.
>> > >
>> > > Build Log (for compile errors):
>> > > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > lucidimagination.com
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like the shell scripts in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from LUCENE-3808???

Ok so we can re-enable XML report files (uncomment that stuff in
common-build.xml) but I'd also like it if we could copy the generated
HTML5 reports. They all follow the same naming pattern so a fileset to
collect all the reports should be trivial.

Dawid

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Dawid Weiss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you need these? I can re-enable them, I just didn't think anybody
> was using them. Check out the HTML5 reports though, Uwe.
>
> If you need ant-report XMLs, uncomment this in common-biuld.xml:
>
>                <!-- XML reports compatible with ant-report task. We
> don't use ant-report anyway so I omit these. -->
>                <!--
>                <report-ant-xml dir="@{junit.output.dir}" />
>                -->
>
> Dawid
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The problem is:
>>
>>  -Djunit.formatter=xml \
>>
>> This is ignored now, so Jenkins does not get the XML test results.
>>
>> -----
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:17 PM
>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>>>
>>> I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is borken now or
>>> not called at all.
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
>>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 -
>>> > Still Failing
>>> >
>>> > Looks like the shell scripts in
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
>>> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from
>>> LUCENE-3808???
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
>>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > > Build:
>>> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162/
>>> > >
>>> > > No tests ran.
>>> > >
>>> > > Build Log (for compile errors):
>>> > > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>>> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > lucidimagination.com
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>>> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
>>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Dawid: Jenkins needs them for statistics, so please reenable them. The HTML reports itself are not really needed for Jenkins, only the XML files, so the Jenkins plugin is happy. This is really needed also for correctly formatting the eMail on failed builds (because stack traces and so on are taken from the test xmls).

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>
> > Looks like the shell scripts in
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be modified to
> call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from LUCENE-3808???
>
> Ok so we can re-enable XML report files (uncomment that stuff in
> common-build.xml) but I'd also like it if we could copy the generated
> HTML5 reports. They all follow the same naming pattern so a fileset to collect
> all the reports should be trivial.
>
> Dawid
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Dawid Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Do you need these? I can re-enable them, I just didn't think anybody
> > was using them. Check out the HTML5 reports though, Uwe.
> >
> > If you need ant-report XMLs, uncomment this in common-biuld.xml:
> >
> >                <!-- XML reports compatible with ant-report task. We
> > don't use ant-report anyway so I omit these. -->
> >                <!--
> >                <report-ant-xml dir="@{junit.output.dir}" />
> >                -->
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The problem is:
> >>
> >>  -Djunit.formatter=xml \
> >>
> >> This is ignored now, so Jenkins does not get the XML test results.
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:17 PM
> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162
> >>> - Still Failing
> >>>
> >>> I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is
> >>> borken now or not called at all.
> >>>
> >>> -----
> >>> Uwe Schindler
> >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> >>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
> >>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build #
> >>> > 13162 - Still Failing
> >>> >
> >>> > Looks like the shell scripts in
> >>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
> >>> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new
> >>> > stuff from
> >>> LUCENE-3808???
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > > Build:
> >>> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162
> >>> > > /
> >>> > >
> >>> > > No tests ran.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Build Log (for compile errors):
> >>> > > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > > ----
> >>> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>> > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > lucidimagination.com
> >>> >
> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --------

Dawid asked me to reenable them, done.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 - Still Failing
>
> Dawid: Jenkins needs them for statistics, so please reenable them. The HTML
> reports itself are not really needed for Jenkins, only the XML files, so the
> Jenkins plugin is happy. This is really needed also for correctly formatting the
> eMail on failed builds (because stack traces and so on are taken from the test
> xmls).
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> > Of Dawid Weiss
> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:39 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162 -
> > Still Failing
> >
> > > Looks like the shell scripts in
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new stuff from
> LUCENE-3808???
> >
> > Ok so we can re-enable XML report files (uncomment that stuff in
> > common-build.xml) but I'd also like it if we could copy the generated
> > HTML5 reports. They all follow the same naming pattern so a fileset to
> > collect all the reports should be trivial.
> >
> > Dawid
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Dawid Weiss
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Do you need these? I can re-enable them, I just didn't think anybody
> > > was using them. Check out the HTML5 reports though, Uwe.
> > >
> > > If you need ant-report XMLs, uncomment this in common-biuld.xml:
> > >
> > >                <!-- XML reports compatible with ant-report task. We
> > > don't use ant-report anyway so I omit these. -->
> > >                <!--
> > >                <report-ant-xml dir="@{junit.output.dir}" />
> > >                -->
> > >
> > > Dawid
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> The problem is:
> > >>
> > >>  -Djunit.formatter=xml \
> > >>
> > >> This is ignored now, so Jenkins does not get the XML test results.
> > >>
> > >> -----
> > >> Uwe Schindler
> > >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> > >> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>> Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 7:17 PM
> > >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> Subject: RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13162
> > >>> - Still Failing
> > >>>
> > >>> I think the target producing the XML files of the test results is
> > >>> borken now or not called at all.
> > >>>
> > >>> -----
> > >>> Uwe Schindler
> > >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de
> > >>> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>>
> > >>> > -----Original Message-----
> > >>> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>> > Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 6:51 PM
> > >>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>> > Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build #
> > >>> > 13162 - Still Failing
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Looks like the shell scripts in
> > >>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/nightly/ need to be
> > >>> > modified to call whatever makes the junit reports for the new
> > >>> > stuff from
> > >>> LUCENE-3808???
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> > >>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> > > Build:
> > >>> > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13162
> > >>> > > /
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > No tests ran.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > >>> > > [...truncated 20724 lines...]
> > >>> > >

biggest problem causing these too many open files was fixed in
r1326473... still i see other linefiledocs leaks (just looking with
lsof).

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13174/
>
> 5 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter.testRandomStrings
>
> Error Message:
> some thread(s) failed
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.RuntimeException: some thread(s) failed
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11B7DBC0291A847B:993EDB7E8A1ED34E]:0)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:449)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:371)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter.testRandomStrings(TestLookaheadTokenFilter.java:38)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1844)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1000(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:748)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:809)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:823)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:758)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:680)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:613)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:652)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:755)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$600(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:606)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:625)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:661)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:672)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:553)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:499)
>
>
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testIOExceptionDuringWriteSegment
>
> Error Message:
> /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/S1/index7357373586tmp/_1.tvd (Too many open files in system)
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/S1/index7357373586tmp/_1.tvd (Too many open files in system)

lucidimagination.com

Thanks for looking into this, Robert. I admit I was a lazy ass and
simply increased the limit on my build server once this started
happening...

D.

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> biggest problem causing these too many open files was fixed in
> r1326473... still i see other linefiledocs leaks (just looking with
> lsof).
>
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13174/
>>
>> 5 tests failed.
>> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter.testRandomStrings
>>
>> Error Message:
>> some thread(s) failed
>>
>> Stack Trace:
>> java.lang.RuntimeException: some thread(s) failed
>>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([11B7DBC0291A847B:993EDB7E8A1ED34E]:0)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:449)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:371)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestLookaheadTokenFilter.testRandomStrings(TestLookaheadTokenFilter.java:38)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1844)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1000(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:748)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:809)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:823)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:758)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:680)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:613)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:652)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:755)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$600(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:606)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:625)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:661)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:672)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:553)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:499)
>>
>>
>> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testIOExceptionDuringWriteSegment

Ha! I knew this capturing of slave JVM crashes would come in handy at
some point. Check out the log at the end:

https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2237/consoleText

Dawid

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2237/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 6068 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> /usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/lucene/build/core/test/S0/index6477964862tmp/_0.tvf (Too many open files in system)

I'll be working on trying to figure out what's causing these errors --
sorry for the noise it creates. By the way -- is anybody else
experiencing "too many files open" problems after upgrading the test
framework or is it jenkins only?

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just wondering how reliable past statistics are with this kind of variance --

common.test:
    [mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/checkout/modules/join/build/test
   [junit4] <JUnit4> says hello. Random seed: B46D16D8897D5186
   [junit4] Expected execution time on JVM J0:     7.76s
   [junit4] Expected execution time on JVM J1:     3.43s
...
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.lucene.search.join.TestJoinUtil
   [junit4] Completed on J0 in 140.48s, 3 tests
   [junit4]
   [junit4] JVM J0:     0.57 ..   141.25 =   140.68s
   [junit4] JVM J1:     0.61 ..    10.59 =     9.98s

Didn't check if it's the multiplier or unfortunate combination of
random elements.

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this jenkins going insane?

ERROR: Publisher hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver aborted due to exception
hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException:
hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: java.io.IOException:
Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.Request.call(Request.java:149)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:646)
at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:821)
at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:814)
at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser.parse(JUnitParser.java:83)
at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.parse(JUnitResultArchiver.java:122)
at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.perform(JUnitResultArchiver.java:134)
at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:19)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.perform(AbstractBuild.java:705)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:680)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuild.java:658)
at hudson.model.Build$RunnerImpl.post2(Build.java:162)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.post(AbstractBuild.java:627)
at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1438)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:46)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:238)
Caused by: hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException:
java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.Request.abort(Request.java:273)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.terminate(Channel.java:702)
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:69)
Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:50)
Caused by: java.io.EOFException
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peekByte(ObjectInputStream.java:2571)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1315)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:369)
at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:90)
at hudson.remoting.ClassicCommandTransport.read(ClassicCommandTransport.java:59)
at hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(SynchronousCommandTransport.java:48)
Email was triggered for: Failure
Sending email for trigger: Failure
ERROR: Error: No workspace found!
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13221/
>
> No tests ran.
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 20703 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Happens sometimes.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 2:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13221 - Failure
>
> Is this jenkins going insane?
>
> ERROR: Publisher hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver aborted due to
> exception
> hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException:
> hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException: java.io.IOException:
> Unexpected termination of the channel
> at hudson.remoting.Request.call(Request.java:149)
> at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:646)
> at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:821)
> at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:814)
> at hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitParser.parse(JUnitParser.java:83)
> at
> hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.parse(JUnitResultArchiver.java:122)
> at
> hudson.tasks.junit.JUnitResultArchiver.perform(JUnitResultArchiver.java:134)
> at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:19)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.perform(AbstractBuild.java:705)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuil
> d.java:680)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.performAllBuildSteps(AbstractBuil
> d.java:658)
> at hudson.model.Build$RunnerImpl.post2(Build.java:162)
> at
> hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractRunner.post(AbstractBuild.java:627)
> at hudson.model.Run.run(Run.java:1438)
> at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:46)
> at
> hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:88)
> at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:238)
> Caused by: hudson.remoting.RequestAbortedException:
> java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
> at hudson.remoting.Request.abort(Request.java:273)
> at hudson.remoting.Channel.terminate(Channel.java:702)
> at
> hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(Synchron
> ousCommandTransport.java:69)
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Unexpected termination of the channel
> at
> hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(Synchron
> ousCommandTransport.java:50)
> Caused by: java.io.EOFException
> at
> java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.peekByte(ObjectInputStream
> .java:2571)
> at
> java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject0(ObjectInputStream.java:1315)
> at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readObject(ObjectInputStream.java:369)
> at hudson.remoting.Command.readFrom(Command.java:90)
> at
> hudson.remoting.ClassicCommandTransport.read(ClassicCommandTransport.ja
> va:59)
> at
> hudson.remoting.SynchronousCommandTransport$ReaderThread.run(Synchron
> ousCommandTransport.java:48)
> Email was triggered for: Failure
> Sending email for trigger: Failure
> ERROR: Error: No workspace found!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Build:
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13221/
> >
> > No tests ran.
> >
> > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > [...truncated 20703 lines...]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reproduces for me:

ant test -Dtests.class=*.TestRandomChains
-Dtests.method=testRandomChains -Dtests.seed=128642F82A5ED904
-Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"

Dawid

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2252/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains
>
> Error Message:
> stage 2: inconsistent startOffset at pos=0: 0 vs 5; token=ಗಚಚ lfxh
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: stage 2: inconsistent startOffset at pos=0: 0 vs 5; token=ಗಚಚ lfxh
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([128642F82A5ED904:2F676B996D4CC4C4]:0)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:128)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.miscellaneous.ASCIIFoldingFilter.incrementToken(ASCIIFoldingFilter.java:71)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:78)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.fi.FinnishLightStemFilter.incrementToken(FinnishLightStemFilter.java:48)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:78)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:558)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:488)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:430)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains(TestRandomChains.java:856)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1844)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1000(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:748)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:809)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:823)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:758)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:680)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:613)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:652)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:755)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$600(RandomizedRunner.java:142)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:606)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:625)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:661)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:672)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)

Sorry, intermediate failure due to upgrading JDK versions on FreeBSD (timezones temporarily missing).

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk - Build # 13261 - Still Failing
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13261/
>
> 313 tests failed.
> FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.TestAssertions
>
> Error Message:
>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F60AD6F9F0E69BE7]:0)
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F60AD6F9F0E69BE7]:0)
> at sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfoFile.getZoneIDs(ZoneInfoFile.java:747)
> at sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo.getAvailableIDs(ZoneInfo.java:535)
> at java.util.TimeZone.getAvailableIDs(TimeZone.java:516)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.randomTimeZone(LuceneTestCase.java:
> 1306)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.beforeClassLuceneTestCaseJ4(LuceneTe
> stCase.java:464)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor12.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI
> mpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRu
> nner.java:1913)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(Random
> izedRunner.java:131)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(Randomiz
> edRunner.java:718)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(Randomiz
> edRunner.java:734)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtException
> sRule.java:75)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.ja
> va:38)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPrope
> rtiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(Randomized
> Runner.java:604)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(Randomiz
> edRunner.java:131)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRu
> nner.java:550)
>
>
> FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.TestDemo
>
> Error Message:
>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F60AD6F9F0E69BE7]:0)
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F60AD6F9F0E69BE7]:0)
> at sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfoFile.getZoneIDs(ZoneInfoFile.java:747)
> at sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo.getAvailableIDs(ZoneInfo.java:535)
> at java.util.TimeZone.getAvailableIDs(TimeZone.java:516)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.randomTimeZone(LuceneTestCase.java:
> 1306)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.beforeClassLuceneTestCaseJ4(LuceneTe
> stCase.java:464)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor10.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorI
> mpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRu
> nner.java:1913)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(Random
> izedRunner.java:131)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(Randomiz
> edRunner.java:718)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(Randomiz
> edRunner.java:734)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtException
> sRule.java:75)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.ja
> va:38)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPrope
> rtiesInvariantRule.java:69)

my bad -- fixing it now...

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2287/
>
> 4 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleBinaryTest.testMultiContentStreamRequest
>
> Error Message:
> MIME type may not be null
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: MIME type may not be null
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F0FD2EF892F2C3E2:1FC903CACCA29BEB]:0)
>        at org.apache.http.entity.mime.content.AbstractContentBody.<init>(AbstractContentBody.java:43)
>        at org.apache.http.entity.mime.content.InputStreamBody.<init>(InputStreamBody.java:46)
>        at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:293)
>        at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrServer.request(HttpSolrServer.java:218)
>        at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrExampleTests.testMultiContentStreamRequest(SolrExampleTests.java:612)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:760)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:682)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:615)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:654)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)
>
>
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleJettyTest.testMultiContentStreamRequest

I committed a TODO to the test.

HyphenatedWordsFilter does some retokenization and offset-changing but
ignores things like posIncAtt

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13380/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains
>
> Error Message:
> stage 3: inconsistent endOffset at pos=2: 4 vs 11; token=**.(**)
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: stage 3: inconsistent endOffset at pos=2: 4 vs 11; token=**.(**)
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6F6AF670E979F3D5:528BDF11AE6BEE15]:0)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:144)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.cjk.CJKBigramFilter.doNext(CJKBigramFilter.java:196)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.cjk.CJKBigramFilter.incrementToken(CJKBigramFilter.java:125)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:78)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:558)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:488)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:430)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains(TestRandomChains.java:856)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:760)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:682)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:615)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:654)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)

lucidimagination.com

This is a test bug.  I am committing a fix...

James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-----Original Message-----
From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2314 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2314/

1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test

Error Message:
Backup success not detected:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <response> <lst name="responseHeader"><int name="status">0</int><int name="QTime">1</int></lst><lst name="details"><str name="indexSize">21,58 KB</str><str name="indexPath">/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/checkout/solr/build/solr-core/test/S0/org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler$SolrInstance-1335207994266/master/data/index</str><arr name="commits"><lst><long name="indexVersion">1335208021601</long><long name="generation">19</long><arr name="filelist"><str>_b.per</str><str>_b_0.frq</str><str>_b_nrm.cfe</str><str>_b.fnm</str><str>_b.fdt</str><str>_b_nrm.cfs</str><str>segments_j</str><str>_b_0.tim</str><str>_b.fdx</str><str>_b_0.tip</str></arr></lst></arr><str name="isMaster">true</str><str name="isSlave">false</str><long name="indexVersion">1335208021601</long><long name="generation">19</long><lst name="master"><str name="confFiles">schema-replication2.xml:schema.xml</str><arr name="replicateAfter"><str>commit</str></arr><str name="replicationEnabled">true</str><long name="replicatableGeneration">19</long></lst></lst><str name="WARNING">This response format is experimental.  It is likely to change in the future.</str> </response>

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Backup success not detected:<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<response>
<lst name="responseHeader"><int name="status">0</int><int name="QTime">1</int></lst><lst name="details"><str name="indexSize">21,58 KB</str><str name="indexPath">/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/checkout/solr/build/solr-core/test/S0/org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler$SolrInstance-1335207994266/master/data/index</str><arr name="commits"><lst><long name="indexVersion">1335208021601</long><long name="generation">19</long><arr name="filelist"><str>_b.per</str><str>_b_0.frq</str><str>_b_nrm.cfe</str><str>_b.fnm</str><str>_b.fdt</str><str>_b_nrm.cfs</str><str>segments_j</str><str>_b_0.tim</str><str>_b.fdx</str><str>_b_0.tip</str></arr></lst></arr><str name="isMaster">true</str><str name="isSlave">false</str><long name="indexVersion">1335208021601</long><long name="generation">19</long><lst name="master"><str name="confFiles">schema-replication2.xml:schema.xml</str><arr name="replicateAfter"><str>commit</str></arr><str name="replicationEnabled">true</str><long name="replicatableGeneration">19</long></lst></lst><str name="WARNING">This response format is experimental.  It is likely to change in the future.</str>
</response>

at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A93FC569246BDF7A:216BFAB38A97B282]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestBackup(TestReplicationHandler.java:895)
at org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test(TestReplicationHandler.java:254)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:760)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:682)
at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:615)
at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:654)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(Randomize

I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't realize that the test is failing :/

But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will someone else be able to have a look into it?
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:

> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
>
> Error Message:
> Unknown action: ping
>
> Stack Trace:
> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
> at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3046FC46F3114533:344926501073FEEE]:0)
> at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(PingRequestHandler.java:66)
> at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing(PingRequestHandlerTest.java:65)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
> at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 7946 lines...]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------

I think I see the problem Stefan, hold tight.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Stefan Matheis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't
> realize that the test is failing :/
>
> But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will
> someone else be able to have a look into it?
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
>
> > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
> >
> > 1 tests failed.
> > FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
> >
> > Error Message:
> > Unknown action: ping
> >
> > Stack Trace:
> > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
> > at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3046FC46F3114533:344926501073FEEE]:0)
> > at
> org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(PingRequestHandler.java:66)
> > at
> org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing(PingRequestHandlerTest.java:65)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
> > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Build Log (for compile errors):
> > [...truncated 7946 lines...]
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

I had another Look at this Test .. couldn't be _that_ hard .. so in the end, it looks really simple: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523955/SOLR-3301-tests.patch

Is this correct? Then i'll go ahead and commit this.
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote:

> I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't realize that the test is failing :/
>
> But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will someone else be able to have a look into it?
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
>
> > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
> >
> > 1 tests failed.
> > FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
> >
> > Error Message:
> > Unknown action: ping
> >
> > Stack Trace:
> > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
> > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3046FC46F3114533:344926501073FEEE]:0)
> > at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(PingRequestHandler.java:66)
> > at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing(PingRequestHandlerTest.java:65)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
> > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)

Just found and committed the same thing in r1329634.

Cheers
Chris

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Stefan Matheis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I had another Look at this Test .. couldn't be _that_ hard .. so in the
> end, it looks really simple:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523955/SOLR-3301-tests.patch
>
> Is this correct? Then i'll go ahead and commit this.
>
>
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't
> realize that the test is failing :/
> >
> > But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will
> someone else be able to have a look into it?
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
> >
> > > Build:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
> > >
> > > 1 tests failed.
> > > FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
> > >
> > > Error Message:
> > > Unknown action: ping
> > >
> > > Stack Trace:
> > > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
> > > at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3046FC46F3114533:344926501073FEEE]:0)
> > > at
> org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(PingRequestHandler.java:66)
> > > at
> org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing(PingRequestHandlerTest.java:65)
> > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > > at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > > at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
> > > at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
> > > at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

Thanks for Confirmation Chris

On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Chris Male wrote:

> Just found and committed the same thing in r1329634.
>
> Cheers
> Chris
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Stefan Matheis <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
> > I had another Look at this Test .. couldn't be _that_ hard .. so in the end, it looks really simple: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12523955/SOLR-3301-tests.patch
> >
> > Is this correct? Then i'll go ahead and commit this.
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Stefan Matheis wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sorry - this one is my fault, i've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3301 yesterday - but i didn't realize that the test is failing :/
> > >
> > > But right know, i don't have enough knowledge to fix the test .. will someone else be able to have a look into it?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote:
> > >
> > > > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13443/
> > > >
> > > > 1 tests failed.
> > > > FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing
> > > >
> > > > Error Message:
> > > > Unknown action: ping
> > > >
> > > > Stack Trace:
> > > > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown action: ping
> > > > at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([3046FC46F3114533:344926501073FEEE]:0)
> > > > at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandler.handleRequestBody(PingRequestHandler.java:66)
> > > > at org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPing(PingRequestHandlerTest.java:65)
> > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> > > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> > > > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> > > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
> > > > at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:63)
> > > > at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)

Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.

Dawid

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2324/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED:  org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
>
> Error Message:
> GMT-00 expected:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT-00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]> but was:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT+00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00 expected:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT-00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]> but was:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT+00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A928CC75CAAEE111:DB64E97A7BCE5762]:0)
>        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
>        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
>        at org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom(TimeZoneUtilsTest.java:96)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)

: Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
: Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.

Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
and i still missed this case -- but of course Jenkins finds it first try.

The crazything: unless i have a serious bug in the test, both of those
TimeZone objects came from calling TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") ... the
only difference is that the "actual" call went through some string
validation first to ensure it matcheda regex.

spooky fucking shit.

I'll dig in more.
: On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2324/
: >
: > 1 tests failed.
: > FAILED:  org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
: >
: > Error Message:
: > GMT-00 expected:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT-00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]> but was:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT+00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>
: >
: > Stack Trace:
: > java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00 expected:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT-00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]> but was:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT+00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>
: >        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A928CC75CAAEE111:DB64E97A7BCE5762]:0)
: >        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
: >        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:647)
: >        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:128)
: >        at org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom(TimeZoneUtilsTest.java:96)
: >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
: >        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
: >        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
: >        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:759)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:681)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:614)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:653)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
: >        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
: >        at org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)

-Hoss

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : Oh, nice ;) Apparently time zone -00:00 is different from +00:00...
> : Depends on which side of the Greenwich your feet are on, he, he.
>
> Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
> and i still missed this case -- but of course Jenkins finds it first try.
>

I'm seriously not laughing at you, just with you. I figured you
probably beat the hell out of that test before committing it.

our jenkins installation is something special...
--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Fuck ... i even busted out test.iters=1000 looking for crap like this,
>> and i still missed this case -- but of course Jenkins finds it first try.

LOL :)

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: The crazything: unless i have a serious bug in the test, both of those
: TimeZone objects came from calling TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") ... the
: only difference is that the "actual" call went through some string
: validation first to ensure it matcheda regex.
:
: spooky fucking shit.

FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...

ant test -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"

And the same test passed on the latest trunk (non java7) jenkins build...

https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...

Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test complained
about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using Java6 and i
don't have Java7.

I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
failure could happen -- unless multiple calls to
TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") return diff objects.  (the only diff
between the expected and actual code paths are that in the "actual" path,
the helper method can return null instead of calling TimeZone.getTimeZone
if the input string doesn't match some rules.

Can anybody reproduce this failure?

you shouldn't even need to trust the seed, just run the entire
TimeZoneUtilsTest class with the changes to "testCustom" i just committed
that explicitly test "GMT-00"

: ant test -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
:
: And the same test passed on the latest trunk (non java7) jenkins build...
:
: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/

-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13457/

: Error Message: GMT-00
: expected:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT-00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>
: but
: was:<sun.util.calendar.ZoneInfo[id="GMT+00:00",offset=0,dstSavings=0,useDaylight=false,transitions=0,lastRule=null]>

This build contained my changes to "testCustom" in the same class that
explicitly called the exact same methods on "GMT-00"...

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1329887

...and yet testCustom passed.
-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: All tests passed

javadoc typo ... fixed.
-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020

The log on Jenkins for this seed says:

NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
locale=th_TH_TH_#u-nu-thai, timezone=Asia/Karachi

and on my machine:

NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
locale=zh_CN, timezone=Australia/Yancowinna

Enforcing these on my machine still didn't result in that original
error though. I tried on Jenkins though (with the same original JVM)
and:

ant test-core -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest
-Dtests.method=testRandom -Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111
-Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
-Dtests.locale=th_TH_TH#u-nu-thai -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Karachi

sure does reproduce every single time...

Dawid

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hostetter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...
>
> Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test complained
> about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using Java6 and i
> don't have Java7.
>
> I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
> failure could happen -- unless multiple calls to
> TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") return diff objects.  (the only diff
> between the expected and actual code paths are that in the "actual" path,
> the helper method can return null instead of calling TimeZone.getTimeZone
> if the input string doesn't match some rules.
>
> Can anybody reproduce this failure?
>
> you shouldn't even need to trust the seed, just run the entire
> TimeZoneUtilsTest class with the changes to "testCustom" i just committed
> that explicitly test "GMT-00"
>
> : ant test -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
> :
> : And the same test passed on the latest trunk (non java7) jenkins build...
> :
> : https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
>
> -Hoss
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Since the last openjdk6,7 ports upgrades, the timezones update may change with every single FreeBSD update, because JDK timezone files are now a separate package shared across all ports. So it does not depend on the JDK version. Die to a bug in the openjdk port this is disabled for openjdk6 at the moment, but will come back!

Uwe

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Dawid Weiss
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2324 -
> Failure
>
> I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020
>
> The log on Jenkins for this seed says:
>
> NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
> sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
> locale=th_TH_TH_#u-nu-thai, timezone=Asia/Karachi
>
> and on my machine:
>
> NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
> sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
> locale=zh_CN, timezone=Australia/Yancowinna
>
> Enforcing these on my machine still didn't result in that original error though. I
> tried on Jenkins though (with the same original JVM)
> and:
>
> ant test-core -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -
> Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111
> -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
> -Dtests.locale=th_TH_TH#u-nu-thai -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Karachi
>
> sure does reproduce every single time...
>
> Dawid
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > : FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...
> >
> > Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test
> > complained about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using
> > Java6 and i don't have Java7.
> >
> > I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
> > failure could happen -- unless multiple calls to
> > TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") return diff objects.  (the only diff
> > between the expected and actual code paths are that in the "actual"
> > path, the helper method can return null instead of calling
> > TimeZone.getTimeZone if the input string doesn't match some rules.
> >
> > Can anybody reproduce this failure?
> >
> > you shouldn't even need to trust the seed, just run the entire
> > TimeZoneUtilsTest class with the changes to "testCustom" i just
> > committed that explicitly test "GMT-00"
> >
> > : ant test -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -
> Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-
> Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
> > :
> > : And the same test passed on the latest trunk (non java7) jenkins build...
> > :
> > : https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
> >
> > -Hoss
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the locale/ timezone used should be simply dumped as part of
repeat string. That array we pick from doesn't need to be sorted, it
can contain different entries depending on the JVM, etc.

D.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Uwe Schindler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the last openjdk6,7 ports upgrades, the timezones update may change with every single FreeBSD update, because JDK timezone files are now a separate package shared across all ports. So it does not depend on the JDK version. Die to a bug in the openjdk port this is disabled for openjdk6 at the moment, but will come back!
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>> Dawid Weiss
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:22 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2324 -
>> Failure
>>
>> I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020
>>
>> The log on Jenkins for this seed says:
>>
>> NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
>> sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
>> locale=th_TH_TH_#u-nu-thai, timezone=Asia/Karachi
>>
>> and on my machine:
>>
>> NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
>> sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
>> locale=zh_CN, timezone=Australia/Yancowinna
>>
>> Enforcing these on my machine still didn't result in that original error though. I
>> tried on Jenkins though (with the same original JVM)
>> and:
>>
>> ant test-core -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -
>> Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111
>> -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
>> -Dtests.locale=th_TH_TH#u-nu-thai -Dtests.timezone=Asia/Karachi
>>
>> sure does reproduce every single time...
>>
>> Dawid
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > : FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...
>> >
>> > Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test
>> > complained about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using
>> > Java6 and i don't have Java7.
>> >
>> > I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
>> > failure could happen -- unless multiple calls to
>> > TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") return diff objects.  (the only diff
>> > between the expected and actual code paths are that in the "actual"
>> > path, the helper method can return null instead of calling
>> > TimeZone.getTimeZone if the input string doesn't match some rules.
>> >
>> > Can anybody reproduce this failure?
>> >
>> > you shouldn't even need to trust the seed, just run the entire
>> > TimeZoneUtilsTest class with the changes to "testCustom" i just
>> > committed that explicitly test "GMT-00"
>> >
>> > : ant test -Dtests.class=*.TimeZoneUtilsTest -Dtests.method=testRandom -
>> Dtests.seed=A928CC75CAAEE111 -Dtests.multiplier=3 -Dargs="-
>> Dfile.encoding=US-ASCII"
>> > :
>> > : And the same test passed on the latest trunk (non java7) jenkins build...
>> > :
>> > : https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
>> >
>> > -Hoss
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
>> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
>> commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

------------------------------------------

: I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020

I agree that LUCENE-4020 is a problem, but honestly i don't think it has
anything to do with this particular bug -- the test never picks a random
timezone from the list of available timezones, it generates random "custom
id" strings (of the GMT+/-\d+ format) and asks TimeZone for it.

: Enforcing these on my machine still didn't result in that original
: error though. I tried on Jenkins though (with the same original JVM)
: and:

Exactly.

the bottom line with that test is that on that machine, sometimes asking
for "GMT-00" would return a diff object then asking for "GMT-00" again 2
ms later -- same "rules" for the object, but a different String "id" value
(even though the javadocs say the ID values will always be normalized)

so we just changed the test to only test that the objects returned have
hte same rules.
-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> the bottom line with that test is that on that machine, sometimes asking
> for "GMT-00" would return a diff object then asking for "GMT-00" again 2
> ms later -- same "rules" for the object, but a different String "id" value

Yes, a different ID, I noticed. It's strange.

> so we just changed the test to only test that the objects returned have
> hte same rules.

I think the test is better now because I don't think there is a
guarantee all TimeZone implementations (and there is more than one...)
need a consistent equals(). Who knows what else was lurking in there.

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: Since the last openjdk6,7 ports upgrades, the timezones update may
: change with every single FreeBSD update, because JDK timezone files are
: now a separate package shared across all ports. So it does not depend on
: the JDK version. Die to a bug in the openjdk port this is disabled for
: openjdk6 at the moment, but will come back!

again: the data in the tzdata file should have no barring on this
particular test failures, because the failure has nothing to do with
lookups of "available ids" -- the failure came from asking for a "custom
id" in which case only the GMT offset should matter -- but two successive
calls to TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") were returning objects which were
not .equals() because the "getId()" returned a diff string for each
("GMT-00:00" in one and "GMT+00:00" in the other) even though the TImeZone
class javadocs say that hte ID will always be normalized)

-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

: > so we just changed the test to only test that the objects returned have
: > hte same rules.
:
: I think the test is better now because I don't think there is a
: guarantee all TimeZone implementations (and there is more than one...)
: need a consistent equals(). Who knows what else was lurking in there.

maybe not, but the fucking ID is suppose to always be normalized...

>>> When creating a TimeZone, the specified custom time zone ID is
>>> normalized in the following syntax: ... For example,
>>> TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-8").getID() returns "GMT-08:00". "

...which is fucking broken in the JVMs jenkins runs.
-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------

My fault, incompletely killed parallel JVM.

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 2338 - Failure
>
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2338/
>
> 18 tests failed.
> FAILED:
> junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.analysis.commongrams.Common
> GramsFilterTest
>
> Error Message:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.commongrams.CommonGramsFilterTest
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.commongrams.CommonGramsFilterTest
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:423)
> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)
> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.instantiate(SlaveMain.java:1
> 43)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.execute(SlaveMain.java:121)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.main(SlaveMain.java:202)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMainSafe.main(SlaveMainSafe.jav
> a:12)
>
>
> FAILED:
> junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.analysis.cz.TestCzechStemmer
>
> Error Message:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.cz.TestCzechStemmer
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.cz.TestCzechStemmer
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:423)
> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)
> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.instantiate(SlaveMain.java:1
> 43)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.execute(SlaveMain.java:121)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.main(SlaveMain.java:202)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMainSafe.main(SlaveMainSafe.jav
> a:12)
>
>
> FAILED:
> junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.analysis.en.TestKStemmer
>
> Error Message:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.en.TestKStemmer
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.en.TestKStemmer
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:354)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:423)
> at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308)
> at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)
> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:264)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.instantiate(SlaveMain.java:1
> 43)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.execute(SlaveMain.java:121)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMain.main(SlaveMain.java:202)
> at
> com.carrotsearch.ant.tasks.junit4.slave.SlaveMainSafe.main(SlaveMainSafe.jav
> a:12)
>
>
> FAILED:
> junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.lucene.analysis.hy.TestArmenianAnalyzer

well i jacked this up... ill revert for now until i can debug it.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13519/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 1661 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

My bad. Mispelled unlock with lock in the finally part ! (so I ended up
locking twice).

Will add a deterministic test commit the fix

Sorry !

Shai

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13658/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.testSearcherManager
>
> Error Message:
>
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.AssertionError
>        at
> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([1DADD745DCD7932:DF595CEEBC418CF]:0)
>        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.getFinalSearcher(TestSearcherManager.java:63)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.runTest(ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.java:505)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.testSearcherManager(TestSearcherManager.java:55)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:770)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:692)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:625)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:664)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>        at
> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>        at
> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 1601 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Committed fix in r1332733.

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Shai Erera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My bad. Mispelled unlock with lock in the finally part ! (so I ended up
> locking twice).
>
> Will add a deterministic test commit the fix
>
> Sorry !
>
> Shai
>
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13658/
>>
>> 1 tests failed.
>> FAILED:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.testSearcherManager
>>
>> Error Message:
>>
>>
>> Stack Trace:
>> java.lang.AssertionError
>>        at
>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([1DADD745DCD7932:DF595CEEBC418CF]:0)
>>        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:92)
>>        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:43)
>>        at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:54)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.getFinalSearcher(TestSearcherManager.java:63)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.index.ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.runTest(ThreadedIndexingAndSearchingTestCase.java:505)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearcherManager.testSearcherManager(TestSearcherManager.java:55)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at
>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>        at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1913)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:805)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:866)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:880)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:770)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:692)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:625)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SaveThreadAndTestNameRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:664)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:812)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:668)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:687)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:723)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.UncaughtExceptionsRule$1.evaluate(UncaughtExceptionsRule.java:75)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.StoreClassNameRule$1.evaluate(StoreClassNameRule.java:38)
>>        at
>> org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSuite(RandomizedRunner.java:604)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$400(RandomizedRunner.java:131)
>>        at
>> com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$2.run(RandomizedRunner.java:550)

I committed a fix...

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13820/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 24095 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll fix.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13874/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 24376 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

Fixed in r1335354.

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Apache Jenkins Server <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13875/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 24129 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl

This is reproducible. i changed it to use newFSDirectory and it still
OOMs... needs more investigation

also, when test fails from an ERROR, (at least here),
-Dtests.verbose=true doesnt seem to work?

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13992/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test
>
> Error Message:
> GC overhead limit exceeded
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A0C5F631EE01E5C1:2891C9EB40FD8839]:0)
>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.Bytes$BytesReaderBase.close(Bytes.java:361)
>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.VarDerefBytesImpl$VarDerefReader.close(VarDerefBytesImpl.java:93)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:170)
>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40DocValuesProducer.closeInternal(Lucene40DocValuesProducer.java:76)
>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.PerDocProducerBase.close(PerDocProducerBase.java:46)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:143)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentCoreReaders.decRef(SegmentCoreReaders.java:145)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.doClose(SegmentReader.java:110)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.decRef(IndexReader.java:230)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.close(IndexReader.java:466)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(IOUtils.java:80)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:649)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:52)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:84)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java:312)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:424)
>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:363)
>        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test(TestSearchWithThreads.java:68)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1961)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:806)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:867)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:881)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:777)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:699)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:632)
>
>
>
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 1582 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

----------------------------------------------------

It's getting the new AlcoholicMergePolicy!!! LOL :)

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is reproducible. i changed it to use newFSDirectory and it still
> OOMs... needs more investigation
>
> also, when test fails from an ERROR, (at least here),
> -Dtests.verbose=true doesnt seem to work?
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13992/
>>
>> 1 tests failed.
>> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test
>>
>> Error Message:
>> GC overhead limit exceeded
>>
>> Stack Trace:
>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
>>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A0C5F631EE01E5C1:2891C9EB40FD8839]:0)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.Bytes$BytesReaderBase.close(Bytes.java:361)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.VarDerefBytesImpl$VarDerefReader.close(VarDerefBytesImpl.java:93)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:170)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40DocValuesProducer.closeInternal(Lucene40DocValuesProducer.java:76)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.PerDocProducerBase.close(PerDocProducerBase.java:46)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:143)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentCoreReaders.decRef(SegmentCoreReaders.java:145)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.doClose(SegmentReader.java:110)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.decRef(IndexReader.java:230)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.close(IndexReader.java:466)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(IOUtils.java:80)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:68)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:649)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:52)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:84)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java:312)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:424)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:363)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test(TestSearchWithThreads.java:68)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1961)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:806)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:867)
>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:881)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:777)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:699)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:632)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Build Log (for compile errors):
>> [...truncated 1582 lines...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------

OK I committed a fix.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's getting the new AlcoholicMergePolicy!!! LOL :)
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
>
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is reproducible. i changed it to use newFSDirectory and it still
>> OOMs... needs more investigation
>>
>> also, when test fails from an ERROR, (at least here),
>> -Dtests.verbose=true doesnt seem to work?
>>
>> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13992/
>>>
>>> 1 tests failed.
>>> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test
>>>
>>> Error Message:
>>> GC overhead limit exceeded
>>>
>>> Stack Trace:
>>> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
>>>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([A0C5F631EE01E5C1:2891C9EB40FD8839]:0)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.Bytes$BytesReaderBase.close(Bytes.java:361)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.values.VarDerefBytesImpl$VarDerefReader.close(VarDerefBytesImpl.java:93)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:170)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40DocValuesProducer.closeInternal(Lucene40DocValuesProducer.java:76)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.codecs.PerDocProducerBase.close(PerDocProducerBase.java:46)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.close(IOUtils.java:143)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentCoreReaders.decRef(SegmentCoreReaders.java:145)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentReader.doClose(SegmentReader.java:110)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.decRef(IndexReader.java:230)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.close(IndexReader.java:466)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.IOUtils.closeWhileHandlingException(IOUtils.java:80)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:68)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:649)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:52)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:84)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java:312)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:424)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.index.RandomIndexWriter.getReader(RandomIndexWriter.java:363)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.search.TestSearchWithThreads.test(TestSearchWithThreads.java:68)
>>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1961)
>>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:806)
>>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:867)
>>>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:881)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$SubclassSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:777)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$InternalSetupTeardownRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:699)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:69)
>>>        at org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase$TestResultInterceptorRule$1.evaluate(LuceneTestCase.java:632)

> also, when test fails from an ERROR, (at least here),
> -Dtests.verbose=true doesnt seem to work?

Can you elaborate? Something doesn't work with the runner's output
stream? That output at:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13992/console
is complete, that is -- what was printed to stdout/stderr is actually
in the report (it wasn't executed with tests.verbose).

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

right, I added the verbose option locally to try to see what it was doing
but didn't see the verbose output... could be a problem between keyboard
and chair as it seems mike figured it out???
On May 12, 2012 5:10 PM, "Dawid Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > also, when test fails from an ERROR, (at least here),
> > -Dtests.verbose=true doesnt seem to work?
>
> Can you elaborate? Something doesn't work with the runner's output
> stream? That output at:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13992/console
> is complete, that is -- what was printed to stdout/stderr is actually
> in the report (it wasn't executed with tests.verbose).
>
> Dawid
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Robert Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> right, I added the verbose option locally to try to see what it was doing
> but didn't see the verbose output... could be a problem between keyboard and
> chair as it seems mike figured it out???

Actually I cheated: I used the python runner (in luceneutil) to get
unbuffered (live) output from the test.  Is there some way to not
buffer the output with "ant test"...?

When I tried to add "-Dtests.verbose=true" I also don't see any output
... it looks like the parent java process is OOMEing trying to gather
up all the output.

The problem is ... that test line produces an enormous amount of
output... the events file is 11 GB.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> The problem is ... that test line produces an enormous amount of
> output... the events file is 11 GB.

Yes, this is the problem, not the OOM in the test itself.

> ... it looks like the parent java process is OOMEing trying to gather
> up all the output.

Yes it currently attempts to buffer the output as part of the test
completion event to report listeners. So indeed, this might have OOMed
on the parent.

> Is there some way to not buffer the output with "ant test"...?

Not really, this is by-design. The issue here is that we have multiple
forked JVMs and all of them may be writing to sysouts at once.
Listeners (including text output listener that writes to ANT console)
receive aggregated events that are atomic view of tests' execution
(for example a single test, with its status, output, timing, etc.).
API wise this could be in fact done at the runner level when
individual events are received (and assuming a single JVM is forked)
but it just smells bad to me.

It is also possible to run just the forked JVM and get its raw output
(much like Mike does with the python runner now?), but it's again
hacky.

Large sysout buffers have occurred in the past (Yonik asked for it for
example). It's definitely possible but it adds complexity to the
runner (it'd have to spill to disk and events would then just point at
a section of the output file). I'll do it at some point but I don't
consider it super-urgent. To my defense, I think the default JUnit
runner would also OOM with large outputs because the mechanism of
passing output data to listeners is memory-based as well:

http://www.jajakarta.org/ant/ant-1.6.1/docs/ja/manual/api/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/JUnitResultFormatter.html#setSystemOutput(java.lang.String)

I filed LUCENE-4053 to track this. I'll grind the alternatives for a
while and think of a way to integrate it.

Dawid

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The broken javadocs link is an api bug. LuceneTestCase.classEnvRule is
public, but refers to a package-private class
(TestRuleSetupAndRestoreClassEnv).

I'll make LuceneTestCase.classEnvRule package-private too (since it
effectively already is).

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/14075/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log (for compile errors):
> [...truncated 24413 lines...]
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
lucidimagination.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------

> I'll make LuceneTestCase.classEnvRule package-private too (since it
> effectively already is).

Thanks.

Dawid

---------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm looking into this.

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2569/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION:  org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains
>
> Error Message:
> last stage: inconsistent startOffset at pos=0: 0 vs 2; token=�� 㕠
>
> Stack Trace:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: last stage: inconsistent startOffset at pos=0: 0 vs 2; token=䶟 㕠
>        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([E3E72D0C6AEF728E:DE06046D2DFD6F4E]:0)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.ValidatingTokenFilter.incrementToken(ValidatingTokenFilter.java:128)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:558)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:488)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData(BaseTokenStreamTestCase.java:430)
>        at org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.TestRandomChains.testRandomChains(TestRandomChains.java:858)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1969)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$1100(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:814)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:875)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:889)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleFieldCacheSanity$1.evaluate(TestRuleFieldCacheSanity.java:32)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:48)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:821)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.access$700(RandomizedRunner.java:132)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3$1.run(RandomizedRunner.java:669)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:695)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:734)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:745)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:45)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions$1.evaluate(TestRuleReportUncaughtExceptions.java:68)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:38)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIcuHack$1.evaluate(TestRuleIcuHack.java:51)
>        at com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesInvariantRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesInvariantRule.java:55)
>        at org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides$1.evaluate(TestRuleNoInstanceHooksOverrides.java:53)

lucidimagination.com